The brutal details Reggie Littlejohn lays out in this video express the core belief of Hussein & Company: [video=youtube;JjtuBcJUsjY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JjtuBcJUsjY[/video] No other tenet of socialisms ideology expresses a culture of death more clearly than does support for Chinas one child policy. From the day Soviet communism imploded Democrats began working overtime to see that Communist China did not go the way of the Soviet Union. Democrat support of China is not about communism defeating capitalist economies, or equal distribution of the wealth, it is about population controls. All of the technological and economic advantages our federal government handed to China since the collapse of the Soviet Union was designed to make population controls acceptable and even desirable worldwide. The best man for the job Hussein & Company desperately want John Kerry for secretary of state for one reason only. He is the most reliable advocate for the brutality done to women that must accompany infanticide. Remember that Democrats tried to make him president. Every leading Democrat is proud of John Kerry and what he stands for including the unbelievable cruelty Reggie Littlejohn has been fighting against: Very few men can live with the unbelievable cruelty done to women and championed by women like Kathleen Sebelius, yet the Democrat party slaughters children in the millions while Socialists wont be happy until they butcher children in the hundreds of millions. Democrats then get away with accusing conservatives of making war on women. The sad reality is that American women who vote for Democrats do not care that government-imposed population control is primarily aimed at female infants. Just yesterday another woman ruled for mandatory contraceptives regardless of an individuals religious beliefs. Take a look at the arrogance and cruelty in Sotomayors face: The best Sotomayor can do for now is destroy freedom of religion in the name of population control. One look at her ugly puss should tell you that she would like nothing better than to get in the trenches and personally do the things that are being done to Chinas women. It gets better Another female Democrat piece of scum, Senator Diane Feinstein, is riding on the murdered bodies of 20 children in Sandy Hook, Conn. in order to register every gun. Registration is the final step before confiscation. Her goal is to eventually collect those guns after they are registered so that only her henchmen in government are armed. The thing that makes Feinstein such a hypocrite is that she is a leader in the political party that uses tax dollars to fund the slaughter of children. Di Fi might just as well have handed Adam Lanza the guns he used because there is no difference between him and her as far as Im concerned. Question: Does Di Fi really believe that disarming law-abiding Americans will stop emotional cripples from killing? Finally, way back in 2000, on my first message board, I said the following. Its gotten worse since then. Baby killing is nothing more than a tidbit for a Socialist who is the contemporary personification of the eternal butcher. Alas, poor bloodthirsty Socialists will have to snack quietly on aborted fetuses until they can sate themselves on some real old-fashioned killing after they have absolute power in their hands. I wonder how many people have noticed that the only individual Right that Socialists controlling the Democratic party ever stood for is the Right to kill children in the womb? Think about that one for awhile without confusing Rights with Entitlements. Even then, the Right to murder children was only granted to half the population. It would appear that Liberals/Socialists/Communists only grudgingly consent to any new Rights; even ones that accomplish Socialist ends by reducing the lower economic classs population growth by court-approved murder. Abortion in this country always makes me wonder if Democratic party big shots bring a pillow along whenever they junket to Red China. Then when they visit government institutions in China where unwanted infants are deliberately left to die of illness or starvation, American Socialists/Communists can impress their Chinese Communist pals by using the pillows to hasten an infants death. A little compassionate suffocation will prove to Peking that everyone is on the same page. NOTE: Prior to 1940, if any person would have said that so-called enlightened governments were going to slaughter civilians in the millions, that person would have been locked away in a rubber room. The government ordered killings that took place in Communist China, (An estimated 30 million and counting) the Soviet Union, (20 million) and Fascist Germany (6½ million) were incomprehensible to decent-people before the murders happened. Those would-be protectors whose souls and minds are diseased with Socialist totalitarianism will kill in the hundreds of millions when they have all of their global ducks in a line. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and the rest of their fraternity would be proud of the progress their fellow totalitarians are making. Has anyone also noticed that when socialisms supporters are talking out of the other side of their faces, they never stop proclaiming their love of representative government? At the same time they preach their love of democratic government, they are working towards establishing an unelected supreme UN government controlled by wealthy international Socialists an domestic tax dollar parasites. Clarification: My use of decent-people as a compound word should not be taken as a moral judgement. It is simply a way to identify individuals who do not want to control anyones life and resources except their own. Heres the link to the article about Reggie Littlejohn:
I liked the video a lot and it really brings out the real issues China is facing with their forced abortions and one child policy. It also really shows their views on girls and women and just how misogynistic they are. The rest of what you say makes no sense to me though because even the woman in the video said, "It doesn't matter if you are pro-life or pro-choice, because forced abortion is not a choice and nobody supports that." And she is absolutely right. This is a tragedy. No woman should be forced to abort just as no woman should be forced to give birth. FORCING women to undergo unwanted medical operations or unwanted physical changes to their minds and bodies is wrong and evil and I am totally 100% against that. They need to find a much better way to control their population rather than use force and cause pain and suffering to these women. Birth control should be free and widely available and they also need to change their cultural views on females as well. They just view girls and women as burdens to their society and that is very wrong. I don't know how to even start fixing China's problem though, it's just so massive a problem, it leaves you feeling rather helpless...
To Pasithea: It might make sense to you if you understand that average people think in terms of abortion while the people who make the laws think in terms of population controls. To Pasithea: Miss Littlejohns heart is in the right place, but she is slightly off the mark on this. John Kerry and the entire abortion crowd in government believe in forced abortions: I do not think Littlejohn realizes where infanticide butchers want to take this country, or perhaps she simply does not want to cloud the issue by connecting forced abortions to population controls. Separating abortion from population controls is an impossible task; more so when talking about China. Never forget that population control is the primary reason China adopted its one child policy. There was never any pretense of choice. Anybody who thinks along those lines must go to forced abortions irrespective of what they say about a womans Right to choose. To Pasithea: Id be more comfortable with your reply had you extended your opposition to forced abortions to include opposition to forced funding.
I vote for what I believe is right and that is the right to choose. You can continue to spout off about how the Democrats and the liberal politicians are only thinking one way or another but you have to remember that the Republicans and conservative politicians don't believe in freedom of choice when it comes to a woman's uterus. I vote and fight to keep that choice free and mind you I often vote Libertarian. Can you cite your source for that Kerry quote? I'd like to read it in full context, thank you. We are all aware that China and India believe in forced abortions. What we're saying though is that we who are pro-choice do not agree with this because it's taking away a woman's right to choose. Voting pro-life isn't going to stop this though because they too wish to take away a woman's right to choose. So I don't see your point here. I don't see what is wrong with taxes going towards distributing birth control to the masses. If we did men and women would have an efficient and free way to control their reproductive health. They would have a choice too, choice to use it or the choice not to. It would control population growth, build healthier family units and so on. We are all forced to pay taxes already and taxes often go to things some of us disagree with. We don't have much choice in how our taxes are used but I do believe that birth control would be a great use for our society.
To Pasithea: It’s in the OP. As to the rest of your response, believe whatever makes you happy. I see no point in going around and around with anyone holding your views.
Well Flanders you are obviously against forced abortion but are you in favor of freedom of choice? Are you ok if a woman chooses to have an abortion without being forced to by the government? Or are you of the complete opposite of forced abortion, forced birth a.k.a. pro-life?
It's only a matter of time before your progressive government forces employers to pay for RU486. Then it will really be killing human life.
Employers don't pay for people's health insurance though. You pay for the health insurance yearly and there is always a deductible, that's how my health insurance works through my dad's work. =/
When the government forces insurance companies to cover medical treatments that may be a waste of money, then they are forcing me to waste my money. I do not think some government bureaucrat should be given such complete decision making authority over what treatments I should be paying for. It is a huge waste. If thw government just handed out free money, at least people could decide for themselves what was important, and there would not be all this horrible frustrating bureaucracy, not to mention idiotic counterproductive incentives. The government is not good at geting the details right. We have enough things to worry about in politics. The dysfuctional details of healthcare should not become politicised as well.
China's one child policy is a necessity. Overpopulation is a serious issue that is currently threatening the entire globe. Did you have any other solution to the problem of overpopulation ?
Except that is how the deductible works. You are only paying for the treatments that you actually use. Like just this year I saw a podiatrist, saw a colon and digestive health specialist, and saw my general practitioner for a regular pap smear and discussed birth control options that wouldn't make me nauseated beyond belief. I paid out of my deductible for each of these things. I didn't pay for anyone else's health insurance, just my own for things I needed to be seen for. You may find those things unnecessary or useless but I felt they were necessary and so I went and got seen for them and paid for it myself. I don't understand why you think you get to decide what everybody else should be seen for or why you feel like you are paying for everybody else's health insurance or their own deductibles.
