Public relations always drive various political movements and rallies against weapons of mass destruction. But the fact is, that most countries, especially nation states, clearly state their technical need to develop as many of them as possible. The USA is the leader of such weapon developments. So, in this thread I would like to propose a type of weapon of mass destruction that can bridge this gap, and satisfy both the PR push, and national governments needs. Let's turn the enemy civilian population gay. We know that straight people can become gay as results of many things, chemical effects, even car accidents. If we can fund a research to develop a biological agent that triggers the changes in the brain that lead to gay orientation, we obstruct the future of the enemy population, thus free up the target geography for new banking asset distribution, but this time without world war piece treaties. Would this be the most human way to advance history? Shouldn't the existence and activities of gay people have already given us the clue to do this? Your take?
Not gay bashing. HEHEHEHEHE What I am interested in is weapons, not gay discrimination/rights. It seems, that statistically, the gay orientation of the brain could be an excellent weapon for population control, exactly the way that banks plan/demand population trends.
Sorry, not even a new thought. This was first researched about 20 years ago actually. http://www.charlestoncitypaper.com/gaycharleston/archives/2007/06/12/gay-bomb-for-real/
I can see that happening. We go from "Men who stare at goats" to "men who stare at each-other" Got it.
Hey, yeah, now that's warfare, Brave New World style. Without firing a shot. I guess it's among the most humane ways of accomplishing the "First Commandment" of the Georgia Guidestones: to "Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature" [
Weren't the thracians that defeated the spartians homosexual? This whole thing could really backfire in a big way.
Well, that is the advantage of being both a trivia nut, as well as a military historian. I pick up all kinds of weird things like this.
Actually, it wouldn't cause "destruction" in the literal sense, but I get it. How about just sterilizing them? Now, the ever present ethical question for the benefit of our liberal guests: Would this action be considered chemical/biological warfare? Enjoy!
In addition to being a biological weapon, also a war crime. Yes, in addition to being "Ethnic Cleansing" and Genocide.