So we are told, anyway: https://www.usnews.com/opinion/civil-wars/articles/2018-03-02/citizens-dont-need-ar-15s https://www.hcn.org/articles/opinion-no-one-needs-an-ar15 https://medium.com/@nelizadrew/no-you-dont-need-an-ar-15-21c8ad9e5e76 ad nauseam Where is the anti-gun left on this now? No commentary on penis enhancements and compensation? Or maybe it's OK for these people to have them because you agree with their cause.
I'd love to see the body cam footage of the larper on the right. Something tells me it's not safe for twitter.
Advocates of greater firearm-related restrictions are merely biding their times in the hope that someone eventually gets shot, so the incident can be capitalized upon and spun as an example of further racism and/or white supremacy being facilitated by private firearms ownership.
Shouldn't you be arguing that all left wingers are armed to defend themselves from right wing terrorism?
I have nothing against owning an AR-15 and/or high capacity magazines, but "occupying" a public area and preventing access using those guns is another story.
I'm just surprised that you're not being righteous. We know that right wing terrorism is the biggest threat. We know that you think guns deter. It therefore stands to reason that you think left wingers should be armed in order to reduce the terrorist threat.
The leftist terrorist, got be leftist terrorist......this is always what happens in the end under leftist policies.
It is not so-called "right wing terrorism" that is currently responsible for the problems being witnessed in the city of Seattle.
What right wing terrorist are these left wing terrorist arming themselves against? Why are they shaking down local small businesses to do that?
Don't hide now. We know that right wing terrorism is much more common than left. We also know that right wingers have committed acts of terror at left wing demonstrations. You surely support lefties being armed to the teeth as a deterrent?
Can you point me to when we saw "right wing" terrorist setting churches on fire, fire bombing property, looting businesses etc
30-round magazines? No. Consider need before you make a decision. Consider the number of rioters that you may have to defend your home against in the various videos. Count the times you see police intervening with arsonists, stopping looters, beatings and such. Anti-gunners are buying guns very fast right now, because they are seeing just how well the police in these liberal cities with dish-rag mayors will actually defend the citizens. Things like riot shotguns for example are sold out everywhere and the manufacturers are buried in back-orders. Sadly, their lack of familiarity, training and skill will firearms can make them dangerous to themselves and others. You can't train somebody well with a video, but sometimes you can correct some of the most likely errors libs with new guns might make. The guy below is trying to find how why his gun didn't fire, and where the shell is. <iframe width="1200" height="675" src="" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Uh, there have been several right wing terrorists who have attacked churches and who used or planned to use bombs before getting caught.
No evidence has been presented to support the erroneous claim presently being made on the part of yourself. Certainly no evidence has actually been presented on the part of yourself.
Jim David Adkisson, Cesar Sayoc, Curtis Allen, Gavin Wright, Patrick Stein . . . Hell, I'd throw in the Bundys and their supporters as being on the same level as the guys in the OP.
The data is freely available. But let's assume that right wing reality does hold and right wing terrorism isn't more common (just to keep the post-truthers happy mind you!). We know that there is a risk of right wing terrorism at left wing demonstration. You do support that they are armed then? Yes or no? Stop the inane dodge now.
Is it being claimed on the part of yourself that left wing terrorism does not occur at right wing demonstrations? Or is it merely being claimed that some types of terrorism is worse than others?
A guy that mailed fake bombs is a bigger threat then these left wing terrorist burnching churches, looting, and murdering people around the United States today? and the Bundy's? Who simply protested the idea of land being taken away? OOOOOOKKKKKKKK
Too bulky. In the AR 15 class, consider 50-round flat mags that change fast and an echo trigger. A magazine only last 5 seconds, so it's good to have a few extras. But my thing is long distance targets; I can hit a dinner plate at 1000 yds about 8 out of ten shots. Not with an AR, of course.
Why can't you answer a simple question? Do you support the arming of lefties to deter terrorism? You're free of course to also remark that you want the right wingers also armed (but they typically are already so its a little redundant).
