You dont need an AR15 and 30-round magazines!

Practically the entirety of Trump's response to his impeachment has been despotic and abusive of his authority
Trump's wall and Trump's tariffs are all arbitrary

Trump's earlier travel bans with no real rhyme or reason except that they were set against Middle Eastern nations are both arbitrary, oppressive an unjustly severe

Trump's recently overturned cruel, unjust and unwarranted actions to the DACA victims. Trump's entire treatment of refugees is cruel, unjust and a violation of several treaties we are signatory too

 

This is not a surprise.
What effect do you suppose the loud noises and bodies dropping like flies will have?
After the 2nd or 3rd magazine?

 

Unsupportable nonsense.

 

Given my Autism and Depression I would not think about having dependents.

 

That is not a rational response to your problems. Autism and Depression are both treatable and very amenable conditions. Would you be saying that you should not have dependents if you required strong glasses to see or were deaf? There is no guarantee your offspring will share your problems nor that yours will prevent you from helping them with their own. It is the right of all humans to reproduce and many argue it is our duty as it makes us more human and perpetuates the race

 

It is a superior alternative to being in the same situation with nothing more than a baseball bat. That is how the matter is ultimately figured.

 

The Second Amendment, like all your unalienable Rights, requires no need in order to be protected. OTOH, your duty to the security of a free State requires that the government hold that Right inviolate.

 

They can get as mad as they want and a mob of hundreds of people would probably prevail over a single person with an AR-15 and a 30 round magazine but it's highly unlikely that any members of the mob wants to be among the first to die.

 

Everyone makes his/her own choice.

 

My daughter fired her boyfriends AR15 at the gun range the other day. She had amazing grouping.

 

How many of her boyfriends did she hit?

 

she only has the one. Today's his 23rd birthday.

 

Well that clarifies that - it was the missing possessive apostrophe in 'boyfriends' that fooled me.

 

I was never good with the proper use of apostrophes. To this day.

 

Women tend to be better natural (untrained) shots than men. They're more in tune with the subconscious calculations that go in to shooting instinctively.

 

That was something Marine instructors used to repeatedly emphasize. Also, women tend to accept expert instruction better when it comes to firearms as they don't have preconceived ideas.

 

The exercise of an individual right is bound by the principle that the rights of individuals are not arranged in a hierarchy, one right cannot be used to suppress the rights of another. However, they can be used to preserve rights.
So, whose rights are being suppressed and whose are being protected? When does the right to free speech and to assemble infringe of the rights of others and who has the right to protect their individual rights?

 

When occupying a public area turns into preventing access. Though there would have to be some sort of intent to prevent access demonstrated. If the mere presence of a gun prevents access to/by hoplophobes, thats just the hoplophobes preventing themselves from access. No protest can legitimately restrict freedom of travel because that is an infringement on a right. But the mere presence of a firearm is not legally or demonstrably a threat, and those who percieve it as one, well thats their problem and theirs alone.

So it all depends on whether access was truly being prevented or not. More context is necessary.

 

No problem, you need to get a job and do your part to fulfill that dream, if not give it up and stop dumping your ideals upon those who actually work for a living.

If you cannot do that ****.

 

No, while you wish you had one, they are not, try the little blue pill.

 

No he pays nothing, you must fulfill and fund his liberal ideals.

He gets to feel good, you get to pay for it, that's how liberals roll.

 

Then you are a totally clueless, pull up a video of the Vegas shooting and you will see how fast people will flee once bodies begin hitting the ground.

Yes that was a passive event, but unless the mob is armed to the teeth and able to shoot back, once bodies begin hitting the ground they will beat feet and get their arse's off to safer locations.

 

Ask the Korean Rooftop Snipers.

 

He cannot possibly believe what he said.

 

I'd want something with more accuracy, and maybe even a scope under those circumstances, but it is a marginal difference

Those guys need to learn to stay DOWN, mobs shoot back and guys behind walls sort of naturally focus return fire on themselves