YouTube Banning Word 'Christian' In Ads - You figure!

If you can choose to be attracted to men then you are already attracted to them.

Could you choose to be attracted to a child?

What about an animal?

 

That’s vague.

He actually issued 276. Care to be more specific?

 

Correct, you can be physical with another male and not be classified as homosexual / bisexual. It is just homosexual behavior.

However, if you are attracted to the same sex or could make yourself be attracted to the same sex you are at minimum bisexual.

 

People chose thoes things every day. Morality demands that you not give into such attractions.

If a gay man cannot resist his attraction to other men then a pedophile cannot his attraction to kids.

 

Nope feel free.

 

Then everyone is bisexual because anyone can choose to do anything.

 

Not true, I’ve tried to be attracted and physical with women, didn’t work.
I’m sure that would be confusing to a bisexual however

 

A gay man should not have to resist his attraction to other men. No one is being harmed.

Answer the question, could you make yourself be attracted to a child? An infant?

 

Again, it is not about attraction it's about behavior.

 

I could , you can make yourself do anything. History is full of people doing what they didn't think they could do both good and bad

Again it's not about attraction it's about behavior. We are not slaves to our chemical reactions.
I am addicted to coca-cola. It iscthe best tasting drink on the planet. I choose not to drink the stuff anymore because it rots your teeth and kills you.

 

Have a nice day.. spent too much time on this already.

 

You keep saying you understand the difference between attraction and behavior but then swap them to fit your narrative.

I am not asking you if you could do something, I am asking if you could feel something.

So you could be attracted (the feeling / stimulus) to a child?
Really?

 

Feelings are irrelevant and easily manipulated. It's actions aka behavior that matters.
Think I'm wrong? Go watch Marley and Me and try not to cry.
Directors and actors manipulate our feelings every time we watch a movie. You think we can't do it to ourselves?

 

And others didn't endure castration, torture, hanging and arrest for simply existing? Christians call it the Cross they have to bear when they follow Christ.

There has been a genocide going on of Christians for the past 7 years and according to religious sites, the deaths average about 300 a day. Most of the beheadings are in Syria and by Al Nusra - who Washington just happens to support.

I looked for a video to see what I could find, but nothing of course except a proud boast of a homosexual escaping the terrorists. No mention at all of the Christians. They're expendable.

Of course there have been atrocities by some who call themselves Christians, but are they? It depends since we're all sinners anyway. Look I'm not against equal rights, but I am against a life style being flaunted and propagated in front of people when they consider it immoral. If something offends, then why do it? What is it gaining them, other than arousing anger and that can only work to their detriment.

As for being superior, you're wrong because humility is a perquisite in Christianity and that comes from redemption and the acceptance that one is a sinner. Anyway I'm not judging you or anyone. It's not up to me, but I do fear for the world and where it's going.

 

If "Christians" would stop being so hateful and actually practice what they preach instead of indulging in primitive tribalism, there wouldn't be a problem.

Plenty of REAL Christians agree with me.

 

I don't disagree with you, I'd have to have a specific instance of a Christian being hateful though.

 

Why is that?

What do Christians have to do with this?

 

It all depends on the mores of the society someone lives in. The ancient Spartans preferred to see their sons came back on their shields rather than without them since it would have meant cowardice. The Carthagians threw their first borns into the fire to placate the 'gods' in times of war. The ancient Greeks/Romans would sometimes sacrifice their daughters and entomb them in bridges to keep them from falling. (The bridges still exist).

The ancient men in Corinth were so enamored by their own sex, that the officials wanted to pass a decree for women to start walking around naked to attract men. Greek Corinth eventually disappeared from the map. I believe it was destroyed by the Romans. Only parts of the Roman city exists today so you can take that whichever way you wish.

Anyway in Lawrence of Arabia's official biography, his friend was asked if he was a homosexual since he didn't marry. Lawrence's friend who was a homosexual said that he would have loved being with him, but one has to understand the era. The mere idea would have repulsed Lawrence. I read the same thing about the Belle Epoque, and that even though they laughed at women kissing each other, the mere idea of men going with men was abhorrent to them.

Yet in the Ottoman Empire, these things were not frowned upon. This is one of the reasons Lord Byron, who was not known for his morality, loved the East. This doesn't mean he was a homosexual since he discarded the advances of Ali Pasha when he was young, but rather loved boys as well as girls. I think it was common with the Ottomans and probably picked up by the Russian nobility later on.

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ads-you-figure.559317/page-12#post-1070840809

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-ads-you-figure.559317/page-8#post-1070833170

 

How is anyone "ON" YouTube simply by the word which describes them being allowed? You're talking nonsense.

 

So then you would also say that Muslims belong in Mosques, not YouTube. I mean, that's unless you have a huge double standard!

 

If that's the case and that's not something Google plans on changing, then I condemn it. I have no reason to believe that, though.

Because I created ads using the same keywords.

Because a lot of people get weirded out over ad targeting. They think of it as invasive and "selling [their] data."

 

I don't see how Christians and Muslims alike could bring any benefit to the YT audience. YT is about reality that religious guys are rejecting. They prefer the hereafter that should better be discussed in a church or mosque.

 

I have a suggestion, why not block everything on the internet unless it's requested This way you won't come across the religious programs you don't want to watch, and everyone else and their children can be protected from occultism, violence, obscene and pornographic junk. Agreed!