Obama Defends Roe v. Wade As Way for ‘Our Daughters’ to Have Same Chance As Sons to ‘

Discussion in 'Abortion' started by TheHat, Jan 26, 2012.

  1. TheHat

    TheHat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    20,931
    Likes Received:
    179
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Obama Defends Roe v. Wade As Way for ‘Our Daughters’ to Have Same Chance As Sons to ‘Fulfill Their Dreams’

    There is so much wrong with this idiot's mentality it's hard to know where to start.

    He just said we must allow abortion so that women can fulfill their dreams and be equal to men. Is it some unknown man's fault that some teenage girl or adult had sex and got pregnant? What has happened to self-responsibility in this country?

    The entire mindset from Obama is tragic. It doesn't even make any sense. Men don't kill babies to fulfill their dreams. What is this baffoon talking about?

    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/oba...rs-have-same-chance-sons-fulfill-their-dreams
     
  2. creation

    creation New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    11,999
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well yes it is, partly.

    Move along people, nothing to see here.
     
  3. TheHat

    TheHat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    20,931
    Likes Received:
    179
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I am not talking about the guy who gets her pregnant.

    Obama is talking like women are somehow victims for simply being women.
     
  4. Unifier

    Unifier New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    14,479
    Likes Received:
    531
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There is nothing more dispicable than a black person or a Jew defending abortion. If your ancestors were the victims of such horrible atrocities as the Holocaust or slavery, you have to be a real piece of (*)(*)(*)(*) to defend the genocide of another group.
     
  5. Cady

    Cady Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    8,661
    Likes Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Because abortion is an attempt to destroy the existence of the unborn as a group...got it.
     
  6. TheHat

    TheHat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    20,931
    Likes Received:
    179
    Trophy Points:
    63
    What he said doesn't even make sense. It's so...far fetched and just out there. We have to allow women to kill their babies so they can feel that they have the same fulfilling of dreams that men do?

    It doesn't make sense.
     
  7. prometeus

    prometeus Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    7,684
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What a fine example of bigotry.
     
  8. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,261
    Likes Received:
    74,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Cherry pick much??
    From your link

    ".............reduce the need for abortion"

    Yep! sounds like a raving maniac out to kill unborn children........
     
  9. creation

    creation New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    11,999
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hmmm

    Is that game set match?
     
  10. prometeus

    prometeus Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    7,684
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What did you expect from him?
     
  11. Makedde

    Makedde New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    66,166
    Likes Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Total ownage, right there, BB. I can't stand it when people pick parts of an article and them spin it into something entirely different.

    Obama is right - the government should stay the hell out of private affairs. If a woman has an abortion it is no ones business but her own.
     
  12. Bfc oT

    Bfc oT New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, a rape baby is a gift from God you know.... or so I hear from some political figures.
     
  13. Whaler17

    Whaler17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    27,801
    Likes Received:
    302
    Trophy Points:
    83
    SO he/she deserves to be mercilessly slaughtered in the womb? :omg:
     
  14. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,261
    Likes Received:
    74,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Does not mean I have to toast that bun in MY oven!!
     
    OKgrannie and (deleted member) like this.
  15. Makedde

    Makedde New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    66,166
    Likes Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If the woman chooses, then yes. But if Rick Santorum had his way, women would be forced to accept their 'horrible gift from God'.
     
  16. PatriotNews

    PatriotNews Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    27,756
    Likes Received:
    3,715
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I remember when Senator Obama said he wanted his daughters to abortion available so they wouldn't get "stuck with a baby" essentially saying he wouldn't mind if they kill his grandchildren.
     
  17. danboy9787

    danboy9787 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,211
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The problem with Roe V Wade is its absolutely unconstitutional. The judicial branch does not have the power to create laws. All they can do is examine the constitutionality of existing laws. So either we listen to the 10th amendment, and let states decide abortion laws, or you amend the constitution. the current system is illegal simply because the judicial branch doesnt have the authority.
     
  18. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,261
    Likes Received:
    74,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Memo to all those focussing on legislation as the "cure" to "stop" abortion

    I live in a state with very restrictive antiabortion laws

    Guess what

    They have not stopped anything
     
  19. danboy9787

    danboy9787 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,211
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, because the supreme court feds made up a law that technically shouldnt exist. then the states could decide whether or not to allow abortions. Personally I'll find a state that opposes murder, but I'm sure plenty will be pro-murder.
     
  20. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,261
    Likes Received:
    74,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Sorry but next time check out the flag of the person you are talking to

    Australia mate - and most of the country until recently had restrictive anti-abortion laws on the books

    And toilet paper would have been more useful
     
  21. Makedde

    Makedde New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    66,166
    Likes Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Better than a girl be forced by her rabid lifer parents to have a baby against her will.
     
    prometeus and (deleted member) like this.
  22. injest

    injest New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    4,266
    Likes Received:
    204
    Trophy Points:
    0
    of course! the sins of the father should be visited upon the child...that's the Progressive way: force an innocent to pay for what someone else did because they share blood.

    it flies against everything America is supposed to stand for but when did they ever care about that? It's all about social justice and reparations with this crowd.

    *note how it's not a zygote or a fetus...noooo, in THIS case it is a baby...and not just any baby but a 'rape baby' which is apparently a class of babies below others
     
  23. injest

    injest New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    4,266
    Likes Received:
    204
    Trophy Points:
    0
    of course not, women could still kill their babies...they would just have to pay a penalty to do so.

    OR they could give the baby up for adoption.
     
  24. Makedde

    Makedde New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    66,166
    Likes Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Women will not pay a (*)(*)(*)(*) thing. They will have their abortions and there is nothing the anti choicers can do about it.
     
  25. injest

    injest New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    4,266
    Likes Received:
    204
    Trophy Points:
    0
    in your opinion only.

    I feel telling your child that her future offspring are worthless is a form of cruel abuse. Obama is telling his children that being female is a bad thing, that nature will turn against them and ruin their lifes. That man can and will prevent that from happening for his own convenience. So she can be a little miniman instead of a woman.

    and this is supposed to raise women up? I don't want to be 'equal' to a man...robbed of the very essense of being a woman. Hell, start hysterectomies to infant girls...that way you can guarantee they won't be bothered with all that female stuff which is so bad. Then the little babies unfortunately born with female organs can compete and be 'just like' boys.

    (and isn't it ironic that women's libbers want to neuter men because being a male is oppressive and men are violent....but they want us to raise our GIRLS to be like men...)
     

Share This Page