Evolution is a joke Pt. VIII

Again, fits with the conversation, do you not know how again? We all know you couldn’t have read all three links in that timeframe. I suggest instead of asking – read them, that is how rs199 is in the position of FAIL once again…

 

Then read it... Which you didn't, and after that, if you still don't know, I will be surprised if you don't, you can answer that yourself...

 

Funny thing is, sometimes I post stuff and it could be about Mickey Mouse, since I know rs199 has no flippin clue what they are talking about, but this time, knowing that there is readers I decided to make all links quite relevant.

 

I did read it. That's why I asked about your reason for posting it. What does PCR and yeast DNA have to do with your discussions with rstones?

 

I'd found and read the first one earlier today. The second one just covered stuff I already knew. I'm interested in how you think those links support your side of the conversation.

 

Everything... If you read it, then you didn't understand it... Do you want me to explain it to you? I thought, since you are so much more knowledgeable than I, you'd be explaining it to me!

 

They do and don't... they are not suggesting what Wired stated. Wired took what is correct, per my site and twisted it for their agenda to combat Creationism...

Did you see the difference?

Wired, as I stated several times, is the Darwinism religion propaganda site...

 

And meanwhile, Im still waiting for answer to this:

 

Do you read? CAN YOU READ?!?!

Here so you will stop...

THERE

IS

NO

SUCH

THING

AS

YEAST

REPLICATING

INTO

MULTICELLULAR

LIFE

Do you understand that now. If you think so - please explain how yeast creates the chromosomes to PRESTO CHANGO multicellular life into existance! You say it can happen, then tell us how it happens there Riddler...

 

Do you think that yeast can replicate multicellular life? If you do in fact think this. Provide a link from a “creditable” site that explains how yeast which is not multicellular PRESTO CHANGO’s whole gene sequences into existence when replicating!!! What is that called anyway? Do you even know how yeast reproduces? How did the specimens in the experiment reproduce? Do you even know?

Your Google Ninja skills are slacking!!! And I thought you were Grasping’s No. 1!!! You dishonor his/her name… you should be ashamed…

 

Please, explain it to me.

 

That's funny, because your first link said pretty much the same thing as the Wired article:

 

While your shoting is mighty impressive, that does not make you right.

Once again from the article:

How can individual cells be permanent arrangement?

If the single cells didn’t clump together and form a multicellular being, then how and why is there multicellular offspring?

If there is no 'yeast replication' then why is there multicellular offspring?

Questions you simply refuse to answer.

 

Yes, at it allready has. You jumping up and down and saying that it is not, doesn't matter one iota.

I did provide a link. Just because **you** do not agree with findings does not mean the site is less creditable”, it just furthers shows your ignorance of Evolution.

Ad homs?

 

I can't find a better picture to sum the OP's knowledge of Evolution.

 

The experiment is testing yeast colonies... From method one you are preparing yeast DNA.

In method 2 you are testing the yeast "colony"...

By reading the experiment - do you know HOW they created the colony of yeast? Here is the site - so you can go through it again. After all this crap you've been spouting about what you remember and grilling me about what I don't, I can't believe I am explaining this to you... Really... I am stunned!



http://depts.washington.edu/younglab/yeastprotocols(htm)/colPCR.htm

 

And that is the definition of a colony... Why am I explaining this to you... You never did experiments with yeast? This should be a no brainer for you, why are you saying different?

Now... I question you... I think you are just a Shogun Google Searcher. That is probably why you didn't translate the sequence I put forward. The stuff I do remember is pretty basic to say the least, and if I remember something you should have it memorized backwards after all the crap you've been talking!!!

Why in the hell would you not see what the difference is between the articles I posted and Wired? That's just ridiculous!!! Straight ridiculous!!

 

It doesn't have multicellular offspring. What is so hard about that? You are holding your Bible (Wired) and telling me the equivalent of Jesus moonwalking across Lake Michigan!!!

I'll believe you if you can find two more articles FROM ACREDITED SITES DEALING WITH BIOLOGY (not retarded wired - which is equivalent to finding something on Rolling Stone) that states that yeast replicates multicellular life.

All you have is that ONE RETARDED SITE that said something incorrectly, not even a biology site, not even has biologist writing on the site, and that is your Bible...

Show me from a Biology site that yeast replicates multicellular life?

Show me how the experiment yeast multiplied?

Show me that you know ANYTHING outside of what your religion told you that yeast replicates multicellular life?

Your post demonstrates how crazy religious some Darwinist can be... and people are reading...

 

Just because that is the only site on the web that states this shows it is probably incorrect... Find something from a biology site at least...

Also, I can find more sites that state that our missing socks are caused by aliens and gremlins... I bet I find more than one that would agree with me!

So, if I find more than one - does that mean it's correct? Since I found it on an unrelated site?

 

WIRED SAID THERE ARE ALIENS ON METEORITES!!!!!!



http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/03/aliens-riding-meteorites-arsenic-redux-or-something-new/



Yea... Great site you have there... Full of just truthful water walking huh...

 

Wired is HILARIOUS!!!

UPDATE FROM WIRED!!! If we crack the code and figure out how to talk to dolphins, we will be able to speak to the vast amount of aliens flying around in our solar system!!!

The Kepler Space Telescope announced a new bonanza of distant planets this month, reconfirming that solar systems, some possibly hosting life, are common in the universe.

So if humanity someday arrives at an extraterrestrial cocktail party, will we be ready to mingle? At the Wild Dolphin Project in Jupiter, Florida, researchers train for contact by trying to talk with dolphins.

“From the way the presenter was speaking, I thought he was going to announce that he had found a signal of extraterrestrial intelligence,” Doyle said. “We’ve been waiting for this for years, but I thought, ‘We’re not ready!’ We can’t even speak to the intelligent animals on Earth.”

 

I wasn't asking you to explain the link. I was asking you to explain the relevance of it to your discussion. Your explanation of the link isn't even in the ballpark of what it describes. It's all PCR - polymerase chain reaction. That whole link is about getting DNA from yeast and replicating it for analysis. Their mix in method 2 includes triton X-100, which basically punches holes in the cells so that the DNA can get out and be replicated. That kills the cells. They even state this explicitly at the top of the page: "Method 2 lyses the cells right in the PCR reaction."

This is why I asked about the link's relevance. It doesn't appear to have any. To me, it looks like you just picked a link about yeast and posted it without reading it, or at least without understanding it.

 

Please, point out the differences. Just quote a couple. Based on your inability to understand your PCR link, I don't doubt that you think there are differences between the two articles. I'm also pretty sure you're just misreading or misunderstanding the information.

By the way, one major difference between colonies and the multicellular yeast in rstones' link: colonies don't replicate as a whole and they certainly don't split by triggering the death of the cells between them. Both articles describe that behavior in the experiment.

 

Again... Why do you insist on jumping into other conversations and not know what the conversation is and post irrelavent banter?

I just told you why it was relavent and it is. Now... I will ask you the same question that you did not answer again - do you know HOW they created the colony of yeast?

I am just refusing to even be a little nice on this since you raked me over the coals for a memory that is 30 years old from college and you can't even follow along with this simple conversation... Answer my question and all will become quite clear (hopefully)...

 

Did you even read the article or did you just look at the headline?