So the official story is the plane buried and then the ground pulled itself over the hole to cover it. I can't believe people buy into this official cuckoo story!
So where is your proof that flight 93 DIDN'T crash there. Remember, your retarded opinion is NOT proof of anything related to 9/11. It is proof of a lot of other stuff, but that is beside the point. So go ahead. You've made the claim. Back it up.
Hey! Just noticed! You still repeat the same old lie over and over again without addressing the topic! I believe that is called trolling and against the TOS. How about addressing the questions posed to you? Or is that too much to ask in a debate forum?
THIS. But now the OP did come back to the thread, http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/232465-simple-request-flight-93-a-13.html#post1060881962 Maybe he can take the time to clarify the OP per requested; http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/232465-simple-request-flight-93-a-3.html#post1060865080 I understand he was banned for a while, but now he's back he can take responsibility for this thread. Even suede agrees the OP is a false premise http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/232465-simple-request-flight-93-a-11.html#post1060875202
Equally as difficult as ascertaining the whereabouts indicating proof of a buried plane. Like the wife beater, we just have to take him at his word...
Hi, OP. Since you've returned could you please address/clarify this thread? I'm starting to suspect you've put people on ignore who are making this reasonable request. If that's true, then reporting this thread might be the only option since starting a badly conceived thread on a false premise, ignoring questions to clarify your thread/premise, then blocking/putting on ignore anyone asking for Op to clarify, must be some sort of trolling and definitely against the forum rules. Even your friend suede agrees the thread is flawed. So please answer the questions soon. Thanks.
I'm pretty sure it would be the first time a plane buried itself underground, then sealed itself underground, and never to be seen again. The FBI having to lie about something like this is probably a first too.
The premise was promoted and created by "official" sources. Flawed? Of course it is, don't be ridiculous. Please feel free to put me on ignore.
Thank you for replying. However you seem to be ignoring the real question; maybe if you had answered it when it was asked it wouldn't sound so confusing now. The question: http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/232465-simple-request-flight-93-a-3.html#post1060865080 The premise of your thread, OP, is that there is a valid controversy. This premise is flawed unless you show otherwise. If you can't show otherwise, the thread should be locked because it's just being used as an excuse for "truther" troll spam. (Maybe mods should give tutorials on how to start good threads...)
Only those in opposition to the "official" BS story have their threads locked. I'm sure you're aware of it, but if not, there ya go. Thanks! Hugs and kisses!
You didn't clarify the intent of your thread in this post. You did not explain where a valid controversy exists outside of "truthers" on this forum. Ergo, the premise of this thread is flawed since there is not a valid controversy. If there was you would have shown where instead of replying with time wasting, disrespectful, cutesy rejoinders. Now OP has conceded his the premise of his thread is flawed, something even Suede agrees with, the thread can be locked. Otherwise it's just troll bait, if that wasn't the intent all along.
Doesn't matter if the plane was 100 feet down or scattered all over the surface,the people on board are DEAD,and there WAS evidence found of the plane,and it WAS NOT 'planted',and this sick obsession about the plane being buried or not is sick
I beg to differ Sir. When it is claimed that 93 was "mostly recovered" or "95% buried" OR whether is was "scattered all over the surface", it makes a very big difference to those wanting to verify the truth. The differences don't matter to the dead...true...but, the differences SHOULD certainly matter to the living.
