You aren't interested in the 'truth' you just want to play 'gotcha'.....and the dead mean jack to you truthers,they're just a means to an end.
No Sir...that's your opinion perhaps. Truth is all I've ever sought. (The "gotchas" are an intended bonus).
Wrong. You've been wasting people's time with TROLL THREADS. If the truth was all you've sought, you would have answered questions about your OP sooner.
Nobody wants to answer. They just dance instead. I'm all for direct questions and answers minus all of the name calling, and sarcasm. Tried it several times here. Doesn't seem to work though. "Official" BS story believers seem to live for those kinds of things.
Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). If the truth is truly what you are seeking, why do you dismiss any and all evidence that doesn't fit your bull(*)(*)(*)(*) theories? When shown an engine from Flight 93 that was submitted in a court of law as valid evidence repleat with chain of custody, you pretended it was something with dirt that could have been taken anywhere. That is dismissal of evidence for no reason other than a retarded opinion. So where is your proof everyone at the site is lying? Where is your proof ANYONE at the site is lying? You are dismissing all testimonies and ignoring the fact over a thousand people worked there and agree that Flight 93 crashed there. How is that seeking the truth? It isn't. It is ignoring evidence while (*)(*)(*)(*)ting on the truth. You can make any claims you want. Your own actions prove your claim is a blatant and poorly crafted lie.
Then why are you referencing killtown garbage. Especially given this admonition. Is there ANYTHING other than "he said, she said" on killtown's site?
That's what truthers do when presented with something they can't defend. And then a few posts later they will accuse others of "dancing".
Who would want to debunk his lameassed opinion? He had nothing to back up his retarded claims but his own grossly inflated ego. He has no evidence. If he did, he might actually be somebody. As it is, he is a major nobody.
Killtown is self debunking. No evidence, just opinion and innuendo. Some entertaining videos if you don't take them seriously. I doubt anyone really does anymore.
some people actually are stupid,but I would bet those who,after a decade still think the official version is true are more than likely shills.......Planes dont just vanish into the earth.....was the ground really that soft? Then what about the little pieces of metal,how did they wind up 8 miles away?...dig a tunnel,bounce of the extremely soft trampoline like surface? rolled? floated? bounced ? keep in mind the FBI agent states that there was a 9 knot wind,this equals just over 10m.p.h....a gentle breeze... [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frAbhnFdsoQ&feature=plcp&context=C330446bUDOEgsToPDskKwpN3DR5YCU8gsbIzxLawD"]911,FBI tries to explain a 6-8 mile debri field - YouTube[/ame] Col. Don de Grand pre already stated the North Dakota Air Guard..HAPPY HOOLIGANS... shot down "93" with a sidewinder,this explains an 8 mile debris field,believe what you want,if you havnt learned in a decade then its really not worth even trying.
The frequency of the same posters over and over, for years and years, advocating the same thing, day in and day out, should suggest the presence of the shill rather easily.
No...I was thinkin' more along the lines of some folks appearing and reappearing any time of day or night, seemingly available 24/7, and with the same cast of characters seemingly rotating around (or in packs when called upon). The ones who fight vigorously with seemingly endless defense of anything "official", for literally years on end, in the same forums, sometimes under different names, almost like it's their job with all the time they spend at all odd hours of the day. ...those are the kind of folks I was referring to...since you asked.
Here is a simple harsh reality that probably escapes you ... in the ongoing battle between the earth and objects made of mostly aluminium, the ground has yet to lose. Here is another one ... NO debris was found 8 miles away !!!
Mine favorite are the ones who claimed they had evidence to prove most of Flight 93 buried, they later back-tracked and said no, they didn't. My other favorites are one who claimed there were "numerous" plane-buried witnesses, but could one produce ONE which they say they are a witness because they *think* that witness must of saw something. My, my.
Well since the plane was said to bury deep into the ground, I'd say the aluminum won! Yeah, here is another one ... another BLUNDER by Gaze! Maybe you should stick with red barns, Gaze.
Nope ... the ground won ... the aircraft was shattered and broken up by impact PLUS fuel exploding. How so ... debris was BLOWN away, you know, on account of it being LIGHTWEIGHT and easily carried by the wind ... that does NOT equate to proof of what you are trying to infer here. Keep telling yourself that, you might believe it ... no-one else does ... the desperation is as palpable as you trolling another site for no other reason than you "thought" you had a Pyrrhic victory. Sorry suede, but like everything else you touch here, this fails to hit its intended target, your teeny weeny little barbs are just too blunt and powerless !!!
Ah, more bull(*)(*)(*)(*) lies from suede. Still can't debunk my witness, eh? Couldn't dream up a better excuse than a reporter would have reported him in the hole? Sorry, charlie. You lose. Still.
They should invite abnormal psych students in to examine the textbook cases of rampant paranoid delusions and persecution complexes going on in this forum.
