***MOD ALERT***City of dallas in denial that oswald is innocent.

Yet they can't PROVE what they 'say',tsk

 

They prove it on film right in front of your eyes. What constitutes proof with you?

 

Ruby did NOT 'work with nixon'...<eyeroll

 

the so-called "pristine magic bullet", is warped and bent.

it isn't pristine at all.

 

If you don't know what proof is,I can't tell you.

- - - Updated - - -

plus it has rifling marks on it.

 

LOL. You are a funny man. Those of us who have done our homework know that Jack Ruby worked for Nixon years before the Kennedy assassination. Search engines are your friend.

In your world, proof would be a government agent admitting to killing JFK? LOL.

 

Ruby was a mob connected bagman,he did NOT work for nixon,and search engines gcan tell you all kinds of crap that isn't true...like they've apparenly told YOU.

And in my world,proof is conclusive evidence,backed up by FACT,not supposition.

 

Jack Ruby did not work for Nixon? Interesting. Almost everyone acknowledges that he did. What do you know that the rest of us do not know?

 

Who is 'almost everyone'?

 

People who do their own research.

 

LOL. Put "jack ruby worked for nixon" in any search engine and see what happens.

 

The same thing that will happen of I type 'bigfoot' or 'ancient aliens'

 

In other words,people who make (*)(*)(*)(*) up.....thanks for clearing that up

 

I think if anything has been proven in this thread , is that a majority of conspiracy kooks are mentally unbalanced as well as suffering from a undeserved sense of egotism.

 

Do you mean the people who still believe that Oswald acted alone? That's a kooky theory for sure.

Jack Ruby and Nixon
http://jfkfacts.org/assassination/fact-check/fact-check-did-richard-nixon-know-jack-ruby/

 

You nailed it with this one,bluespade...

 

If he didn't act alone, that means he was part of the alleged conspiracy which would leave him far from innocent. But just close your eyes and cover your ears when its shown to you cause the truth shall set you free.

 

I did, all I got were links to conspiracy nutter sites. Nothing earth shattering or spectacular.

 

The Justice Department reviewed the HSCA report and the National Academy of Science's study of the acoustical evidence. It reported to the Judiciary Committee on March 28, 1988 and rebuked the HSCA's conclusion of a probable conspiracy.[34]

In 2003, an independent researcher named Michael O'Dell reported that both the National Academy and Dr. Thomas had used incorrect timelines because they assumed the Dictabelt ran continuously. When corrected, these showed the impulses happened too late to be the real shots even with Thomas's alternative synchronization. In addition, he showed that, due to a mathematical misunderstanding and the presence of a known impulse pattern in the background noise, there never was a 95% or higher probability of a shot from the grassy knoll.[35]

A November 2003 analysis paid for by the cable television channel Court TV concluded that the gunshot sounds did not match test gunshot recordings fired in Dealey Plaza any better than random noise.[36] In December 2003, Thomas responded by pointing out what he claimed were errors in the November 2003 Court TV analysis.[37]

In 2003, ABC News aired the results of its investigation on a program called Peter Jennings Reporting: The Kennedy Assassination: Beyond Conspiracy. Based on computer diagrams and recreations done by Dale K. Myers, it concluded that the sound recordings on the Dictabelt could not have come from Dealey Plaza, and that Dallas Police Officer H.B. McLain was correct in his assertions that he had not yet entered Dealey Plaza at the time of the assassination.

In the March 2005 issue of Reader's Digest, it was reported that Carl Haber and Vitaliy Fadeyev were assigned with the task of digitally restoring Dictabelt 10 by Leslie Waffen from the National Archives. Their method consisted of using sensors to map the microscopic contours of the tracks of old sound recordings without having to play them using a stylus, which would further degrade the sound. Dictabelt 10 was worn from countless playings and cracked due to improper storage.[38][dead link] By 2010 digital restoration of the Dictabelt seemed a more distant prospect, with both funding and final approval for the project unlikely to be secured in the near future.[citation needed]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictabelt_evidence_relating_to_the_assassination_of_John_F._Kennedy

Debunked.

 

You mean Dan Rather? He is the one that distorted the character of Lee Harvey Oswald in the first place. It is actually head in the sand nutty to believe that Oswald acted alone. There is no evidence for it and there is plenty of evidence indicating a conspiracy. There was going to be an assassination attempt in Chicago and Tampa before JFK was killed in Dallas. Oswald was not in Chicago or Tampa.

New book tells of JFK plot in Tampa

 

You mean Oswald was not the only one to disapprove of JFK and someone in a completely different area of the country might have objected to JFK's policies? Wow!!! What a concept! I wonder how many people wanted to kill Lincoln besides John Wilkes Booth? I am sure there were many throughout the south, does that mean they were all colluding together? Absolutely not. Please provide evidence that Oswald did not act alone. Not theory, not suggestion, not speculation. Evidence, proof. I have already provided a debunking of the dictabelt recording. So forgive me if I don't take you seriously when you say there is evidence to support this massive cover up without presenting any.

 

I am not going to do your homework for you. You can believe whatever you want to believe. You can believe in the tooth fairy for all I care. I know there was a conspiracy, because I have done my homework, and you sound like a nutjob to me when you claim that Oswald acted alone.

 

Oswald acted alone. I know that makes you sad. Life is filled with little disappointments.

 

You keep appealing to some unseen authority,while smarmily telling us to 'do your homework'...


Not up to us to prove your claims,junior...that's YOUR job

 

LOL. Head stuck in the sand. Do you know who William Guy Banister was?

- - - Updated - - -

It is your job to prove your nutjob conspiracy theory that Oswald acted alone. I don't buy it. I am not offering "who done it." You are.