Oswald did it, Conspiracy theorists in denial and cannot accept it

Thetime of Tibbets shooting was never " changed " many officers heard the call that Tibbets was shot and not all of them noted the Exact time in fact officers do not note such times their dispatchers do.

The point is this claim of an officer hearing this at 1:06 is meaningless

The description matched Oswald very closely which is why Tibbet stopped him.

Yes it also matched many other men throughout the Dallas area which is any over ten other individuals in various parts of Dallas were also stopped and questioned by the police for the same reason. Tibbets just happened to find the correct man who then shot him.

There is no mystery here.

 

Makes sense

 

It is fatiguing having to prove them wrong over and over again, but it is important because the same team that killed JFK is behind all the other conspiracies as well. Not the exact same people but the same criminal team has gotten away with killing and stealing for so many decades. It is time to expose them to the court of public opinion once and for all to see.

 

Apparently you ignored my response to nastimarv in which I debunked al of these claims of his.

There is no evidence whatsoever of such a team as you describe yet I keep asking you to provide said evidence.

 

You debunker you.

 

Oh es, everything in the world is a conspiracy.

Fluoride in water, Iran Embassy, October Surprise, Tet Offensive, Invasion of Kuwait, Vince Foster, 9-11, New World Order, HAARP, RFID, Oklahoma City, Flight 103, Sandy Hook, Boston Bombing, Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed, RFK, MLK, JFK, JFK Jr, Malcolm X, Sony Bono, Marilyn Monroe, Tupac, Whitney Huston, Michael Jackson, OJ Simpson, Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the Holocaust, the Armenian Genocide, genetically modified crops, global warming, global cooling, Solar Warden, Apollo Moon Landings, Haiti Earthquake, Indonesia Earthquake, Port Chicago, Philadelphia Experiment, Chemtrails, cars that run on water, solar cell repression, cold fusion, AIDS, Area 51,

And a partridge in a pear tree!

Is it any wonder that most sane and rational people tend to reject this lunacy? And I bet that you and most other in the "conspiracy camp" believe in most if not all of those "conspiracies".

 

The Gulf of Tonkin was a proven false flag conspiracy. The Federal Reserve was formed in conspiracy at Jekyll Island. The Feds even admit that conspiracy between international bankers and politicians on their own website. Minneapolis Federal Reserve: Paul Warburg's Crusade to Establish a Central Bank in the United States

The USS Liberty, JFK, RFK, and 9/11 are obvious conspiracies and cover-ups. I don't know about many of the others. Just because some conspiracies are real does not make everything a conspiracy. That is just nonsense.

 

There are so many falsehoods in your "debunking" that I don't even know where to begin. Here's one example. You claim the motorcade wasn't late.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_John_F._Kennedy_assassination

 

Sane and rational people don't believe every word that's force fed to them. Sane and rational people question their government. I suppose you still believe there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and that the Gulf of Tonkin incident really happened.

 

As for Gulf of Tonkin Incident, that was real. Otherwise you would not have had a sunken North Vietnamese patrol boat, and 4 dead North Vietnamese sailors.

Do I think that was exaggerated? Yes. Do I doubt it happened at all? No.

And interestingly, even Wikileaks admits that WMDs were found, just not in the quantity expected.

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/201...nt-continued-in-iraq-with-surprising-results/

 

The first battle, yes. But the second battle which is what Johnson used to really get us into Vietnam was BS.

Oh yes. The chemical weapons given to Saddam by the US during the Iran/Iraq war. Remember this picture?



Speaking of government/military industrial complex doing bad things, have you by any chance heard of Operation Northwoods?

 

George Bush couldn't find them. "Those weapons of mass destruction gotta be somewhere."

[video=youtube;nKX6luiMINQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKX6luiMINQ[/video]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKX6luiMINQ

 

So Wikileaks lied about the finding of WMDs?

Let me guess, all of those mass graves were faked too, right?

 

This is a typical reversal of the truth. Denialism is effectively refusing to look at the evidence because you think you know what happened based on what someone else has told you. That would be the opposite of what we are doing, and the definition of what you are doing. The facts indicate that it was not a single shooter, and so your arbitrary psychological generalisations of a massive and diverse movement of people mean nothing other than you are not prepared to acknowledge those facts.

Another total reversal of the truth. If there were any facts or evidence that the 9/11 story were true, then there would not be professional scientists lining up in a queue to say that it isn't, and Richard Gage would not have collected the names of 2,000 extremely angry architects and structural engineers.

As is very typical in the fascist politics which dominate your country, the people you are accusing are innocent of what you are accusing them of, and you are guilty as sin of it.

It's difficult to know what to do when faced with such obvious lies. The computer model showed that it was possible, not probable. One bullet in the open air causing seven different wounds spread between two different people is not probable. Please stop being utterly absurd. The second person has always maintained he was shot after Kennedy, so you're simply ignoring the facts in favour of making up stories which aren't true.

 

Saddam had no functional WMDs. The only reason the fascists thought he did is because Donald Rumsfeld sold them to him in 1988. Fox ran a story a few years ago quoting two Republican senators as saying they had found 500 WMDs. These turned out to be fully decommissioned weapons, something the article tried to cover up, and actually proved that Saddam had been abiding by UN regulations. The article was removed shortly after I started linking it everywhere and ridiculing it.

 

Try watching this then:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/tech/cold-case-jfk.html

Probably half of the program was on ballistics, especially the odd quirks of the round and weapon used.

 

Ask yourself this. Who runs PBS and do they have a vested interest in this case?

 

The video won't run in my country.

Frankly, I don't care if it was an interview with God. One bullet in the open air causing seven different wounds, spread between two different people, is not probable. Your own common sense should refute that in less time than it takes to run a Google search.

 

I'm sure saddam is cackling from the grave at such gross ignorance..

By the way,what 'weapons' did Rumsfeld 'sell' him in 1988?

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-153210/Rumsfeld-helped-Iraq-chemical-weapons.html

 

Ahh the 'dual use items',thought so.

fail.

 

Typical response.



Of course, every serious investigation has had the same result, but ignore everything you do not like. I am not surprised at all.

After all, everything is a conspiracy!

 

so when a media outlet says something you don't like, you simply go all conspiracy theory?

that's real intelligent and mature.

 

That is part of the complete break in logic that I absolutely love.

THE US SOLD HIM CHEMICAL WEAPONS!

Then they turn right around and say:

IRAQ DID NOT HAVE CHEMICAL WEAPONS!

This is typical of the logic I expect from Conspiracy Nuts. In other words, none.

[video=youtube;XEg79bJ9Bxo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEg79bJ9Bxo[/video]

And from what follows, it is obvious your mind is completely closed, refusing to even consider anything that does not agree with what you have determined is the "truth".

 

Considering our whole point is that government was involved, it seems pretty silly to try to convince us with information coming from the government. It ain't rocket science.