Debunking 09/11

http://www.debunking911.com/

This is such a comprehensive annihialation of every conspiracy claim that's it's almost abusive.

 

The few hard core believers out there will not be moved

 

Other good debunking sites;

911 Myths by Mike Williams
WTC7Lies by Mark Roberts
ChrisMohr911 by Chris Mohr
Debunking the 9/11 myths by Popular Mechanics
9/11 Conspiracy Theory Forum - JREF
9/11 Pentagon Attack Review by Me

 

No, I am debunking the debunkers for free because I love liberty and I know that it is the truth that sets us free... not the lie.

 

NAME them,I'm not going to sit through 2-1/2 hours of a youboob fantasy just because you can't back up your crap,without asking me to waste my time.

 

The truth does not smell like Zyclon-B like the crap that AE911T and the kiddie diddler sell.

 

we all know that the 'experts' on the truther side and frauds and haven't been able to convince the scientific community or publish anything credible. Their claims have been annihialted time and time again but looking at the bigger picture, it's gets even weirder when you try and understand the motivation for a conspiracy.

For this to have been a government conspiracy, so many would've had to be involved - Secretary of defense, Bush, Cheaney, C. Rice,CIA, FBI, press, firefighters, cops, airlines... hundreds and hundreds of people. Why DA FUUKKK would all of these people want to bring down an American symbol like the twin towers, kills 3,000 Americans? We know it's not money, so what is it? To get a greenlight to invade Afghanistan? use the military to keep them sharp? and eventually get the pass to invade Iraq - the ultimate goal. So why DA FUUKK would they even blame Bin Laden? why not make up a story about Iraqi terrorists under Saddam Hussein's orders and plant all the evidence? Why go through all the trouble of dealing with Afghanistan, then having to use a WMD story to go into Iraq? Who the FUUKK would come up with such ridiculous plans? and how DA FUUK would press, FBI, CIA, presiden Bush's adminstration be able to cover it all up so incredibly well? and silence hundreds of people? and why hasn't ANY OTHER COUNTRY uncovered anything? WHY didn't terrorists deny they had been involved? and how would Bush and so many take such a risk of doing this, knowing the chances of it being uncovered were pretty good given the complexity of the conspiracy?

NOTHING OF IT HOLDS ANY WATER OR MAKES ANY SENSE, IT'S JUST WEIRD, FANTASTIC AND CRAZY

 

Standard operating procedure for truth deniers is ridicule. You are really consistent with your ridicule... I'll give you that.

 

It's only because you are really redundant in your bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

 

As Thomas Jefferson wrote, "Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions."

A word to the wise, BJ: When your claims are ridiculous, you should anticipate ridicule.

 

First defense of the tin foilers is to go Sweeney /Martin on the grown ups. "How dare you call our crap into question?"

Blithering twits need to be identified where they stand. Now stand away from each other so that you do not take the bile that I have to aim at a Nazi here.

 

I've never seen this debunked.

http://0911.voila.net/index4.htm
(5th picture from top)

The craft that hit the Pentagon was too short to have been a 757.

 

Debunked right here. The stupid SOB who did that illustration pasted a larger image right over the smaller image in the original..

NEXT!

 

No Scott/cosmored/fatfreddy88/david c,it wasn't.....the black boxes were found,and NOTHING was planted

 

Lots of practice over the years for the team, will do that. Good luck with your honest approach. You'll need it.

- - - Updated - - -

How many blacks boxes in total, did they find? Do you even know?

 

There are only TWO sigmund....they found both of them,the flight data recorder and the cockpit voice recorder

 

You sure, specialist? TWO is the number you'll go with?

 

The point is that the smaller one in the picture the government released is too short to be a 757.

http://0911.voila.net/index4.htm
(5th picture from top)

Anything small enough to be plantable may have been planted and cannot be used as proof.

 

Something wrong with your eyesight? I said TWO..the voice recorder's data was unusable

 

Interesting....

Was it "unusable" because it contained incriminating evidence?

 

And just why the hell not?...usually some proof of things being planted is required,not just the claim they are 'plantable'

try again

- - - Updated - - -

If you saw the picture of it,you wouldn't ask such a idiotic question.

 

The "official" picture??? No, I doubt anything 'official" would sway me at this point. Corrupt sources will still remain corrupt.

 

Not a single one of you conspiracy nuts has touched this, i wonder why? please, someone answer the below for me

 

It's like a catch 22 with you people,isn't it?

You want proof,but you won't accept any if it's an 'official source'

Don't EVER whine to me about me not acceping anything you post EVER

 

You never do so, no great discovery there. When a liar lies, I tend not to trust that liar, the the "official" story is a lie.