The information is self explanatory. I can't help it if comprehension and succeeding steps into logical thought escape the naysayer.
So from your own mouth you openly admit to not only not having ANY proof but that it is also IMPOSSIBLE to acquire any proof. thank you.
No it is opinion with out fact or supporting evidence. The lack of logical thought is yours. There is no evidence, proof or confirmation of demolitions as the OP claimed. It is all fantasy. You link does not provide one fact or speck of real evidence ONLY OPINION OF AMATEURS
If that's how you choose to interpret the words and if that simple conjecture satisfies you, then so be it.
I ststed no opinion I stated facts. There is no evidence proof or confirmation of demolition used On any of the buildings on 911 - - - Updated - - - Not opinion or interpretation it is what you admitted
How about another alternative and that is people look at the evidence, including the newscasts of the day, and come to a conclusion based on the information available. Some people, upon seeing what was alleged to be the video of the crash of FLT175 + the collapse events of the towers & 7 had arrived at the conclusion on the day, that indeed something was very wrong with this picture. There is such a thing as accepting input, and then with the tools you have, that is some knowledge of applied physics, however, when I so often hear people say "I'm not an expert here, so I have to depend on the experts.... " At the level things are, that is the events of 9/11/2001, it doesn't take any sort of degree or advanced education to get this, the "collapse" of the towers & 7 + the nature of the fraud that is the FLT175 & FLT11 fiasco (not to mention FLT77 & FLT93 ) the whole thing smacks of the Saturday Night Live bit with the guy who always lies about everything. The TV coverage just screams FRAUD! The gut level feelings on the subject are one thing, however the facts have been well supported by people who have taken the time to actually analyze the video of the collapse events & FLT175. The results of these examinations, show clearly that there is something very wrong with the official explanation.
That is another common myth of the conspiracy industry. hat I said was told by many and not officially it is fact not a story.
Actually this funny feeling of things being wrong is nothing more than the same wishful thinking that drives every conspiracy. EVery major event or era in history has a conspiracy theory attached to it. But like most such theories science and the law of physics and even simple ideas such as logic prove all the 911 conspiracy theories wrong. There was no fraud and no evidence of one. Just a desire to believe in one because it is more exciting.
This would be simply "wishful thinking" if not for the fact that the evidence points to the fact that the official story is a lie. Have you actually looked at the fact that the gashes made by the alleged FLT11 & FLT175 are the full wingspan of the airliners? The problem with this is the fact that given the wing geometry of the Boeing 757/767 and note that once the aircraft had penetrated as far as the trailing edge of the wing root, the swept back wing design has the tips and that is the last aprox 10 to 15 ft of the wing is still hanging out in space not connected to anything at all, therefore the wing tips could not possibly have penetrated the wall. Note that at the trailing edge of the wing tip segment in question the trailing edge is at least twice as long as the leading edge and so there would be a significant chunk of wing fall to the street below the crash site. There are all sorts of problems that show up in even the most rudimentary examination of the scene. This is the difference between an unsupported gut level feeling and a good educated guess as to what is happening backed up by applied physics.
There is no evidence which suggests that any of the official stories are lies. The gashes made by the aircraft in the sides of the building were normal they were not unusually large or small. Your claim that they would be smaller than the wing span of the aircraft is simply false. Yes the wing tips would have penetrated the wall at the speed they were moving which is the little fact you ignore. No it would not have fallen to the street it would have gone in to the building. There are no such problems only conspiracy theory crap. SO the FALSEHOOD you stated about the wing tip and the gash size is false and absolutely proven so what evere false claims do you have?
No you first. Nothing suggests or prove that the wing tips would not penetrate and nothing dictates or suggests the over all gash in the building need to be smaller than the aircraft. Many common examples prove otherwise but you insist on ignoring them. So offer up some proof.
Is that how all investigations should be conducted? Why do we pay so much for an FBI, an NTSB, an NIST if we can just watch channel 6 and come to conclusions that way? Uhh...buddy...you just said you have to watch the tv coverage so that you can decide for yourself what happened. Now you're telling us that you don't trust the tv coverage? Something's not adding up here. Maybe your guts are in on the conspiracy too. Did you ever think of that?
There's plenty of evidence. It's just that the Kean believers either simply choose not to look at it or discuss it, or choose (for whatever reasons) to profess something else.
It's no more than a story when it can't be proven. The Kean report falls apart all over the place, and the evidence is there for anybody who chooses to look.
No there really is no evidence. Which is why you are attacking those who sstte that fact rather than trying to present any. You cannot present any because none exists - - - Updated - - - No it does not and not one speck of evidence exists despite your claims. I have looked and you are stating a lie. No evidence which is why you keep going in circles rather than presenting any.
It does not apply to me it applies to you. The evidence proves you wrong and is published in many places. It is up to you to present evidence to refute it but you cannot and will not do so.Because you have none and you know it
The evidence proves the 'official' story wrong, in almost every single detail available. You choose to steer clear of such evidence, because it compromises the lies told by our government.
No it does not in fact prove the offiical story wrong. No evidence proves any such thing. these threads prove that fact no one steers clear of it they address it and destroy it proving that no such evidence exists.
