Texas protestors surround conference for Texas Muslims

Since all of the other people holding the (ridiculous) opinion that this isnt a big deal absolutely REFUSE to answer this question, I will then ask you. If you are brave enough to call me ignorant, surely you will be able to answer this without spin, correct?



If you were attempting to improve the public opinion of your group and sway them against connecting you with terrorism, would you invite a suspected terrorist to speak at your event?????????????????????????????????????????

 

The Constitution limits government and has no power to stop the people from assuming guilt or innocence.

 

What does this have to do with the price of tea in China? I am not represented by others nor do I speak for others. This is you and me squaring off so what others have said is irrilivent as others do not speak for me.

When you speak for me you are speaking from a position of ignorance. Each and every time you speak for me I will point out that you are speaking from a position of ignorance.

A moot question as it is irrelevant as to what I would have done. I am not a Muslim, nor was I the conference organizer, nor have I ever met the man who was investigated so that I may be able to make a more objective assessment of his moral fiber. You are fishing for speculation and conjecture which is a horrible basis to build any argument. I said and still say that the man in question is innocent until proven guilty.

 

I agree.

Please provide evidence to support the above claim. By the way, what is your favorite color?

 

Another question, if one assumes guilt or innocence and then states their assumption as the truth, does this not make the assumption the basis of the truth? If not then why the need to assume? What is the basis of a truth if it is not subjective... especially when applied to the highly subjective world of political debate?

 

https://www.google.com/search?as_q=...mages&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights=&gws_rd=ssl

https://www.google.com/search?as_q=...mages&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights=&gws_rd=ssl

https://www.google.com/search?as_q=...mages&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights=&gws_rd=ssl

https://www.google.com/search?as_q=...mages&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights=&gws_rd=ssl

https://www.google.com/search?as_q=...mages&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights=&gws_rd=ssl

 

Thanks. Now what do all those links prove? Some of the quotes are quite old, I would hate my words from 1998 to come back to haunt me especially since I am not the same person that I was 17 years ago. My point is that none of the links prove the man is anything but opinionated... which is not a crime in our Country... if it were most of us here on the forums would be in prison.

I am not shocked that a Muslim wants America to become Islamic anymore that I am shocked that a Christian wants America to become more Christian, anymore that I am shocked that an atheist wants America to become more secular... none of which shocks me at all. I defend freedom of speech... and not just the speech I agree with but also the speech that I disagree with. Unless one is inciting violence then I say they are free to speak their mind.

 

That assumes an ability to comprehend and respond in English.

 

Absolutely COWARDLY cop out.

 

Yes, the protesters were ignorant.
Yes, they have a right to free speech but that does not mean they were right about their protest, as many conservative posters demonstrated on this thread.

 

What do you base your thoughts of the protestors on?

 

Take over by whom? The Irish? The Germans? The Mexicans? The The Canadians? The British> The French? The Chinesae? The Muslims?

Uhm, you have no clue what Sharia Law is and is not. The Confwrence was not about Sharia Law nor the take over of Sharia Law. Try again.

 

" The Conference was about protecting the image of the Prophet and media bias how many times do i have to say this...."

Another poster who cant (*)(*)(*)(*)ing read. Why are you jumping into a thread that is 37 pages long? Try starting from the beginning..

 

The group is nowhere aligned with Islamic fundamentalism. What the group is saying is that the midia has caused negative stereorypes, which is all too present in this thread, about Muslims in general.

the group is not advocating the take over of the United States by the Q'Ran or the use of Sharia Law. They are advocating that not all Muslims believe the same as the Islamic extremeists belive and that was their whole point.

 

But you confidently left out "against hate and terror." The complete title of the Conference at Garland ISD build was "Stand With the Prophet Against Hate and Terror.: That changes the context, even amongst fools and ignorance.

now, let's take a look at the web site. Here is what it says"which will develop effective responses to anti-Islamic attacks, as well as to train young Muslims in media."

That is not establishing Sharia Lw is it? Or how about being in with terrorists overseas?

It appears that you cannot read, understand, comprehend, or analyze the conetent that you claimed to be with terroists.

 

Actually no it doesnt. There goal is to protect the Prophet against hate and terror not that they are against hate and terror.. Its such a simple statement what is your issue understanding it?

I have quoted that site ad naseum i am not going to go over it again because you jumped this late into a thread and you want to troll.

 

And yet, if a Christian group was doing this, they would not be upset or proetest, would they?

 

Is that why they picked an Islamic fundamentalist as their keynote speaker?

 

But but but but but if if if is that all that is left to you?

It is not my fault that you had no clue what you were speaking about when you jumped into this thread and now you are forced to deflect.. Man up. Admit it and move on.. For once.

 

Christians arent raping and slaughtering thousands across the globe over cartoons and soccer games then pretending to be discriminated against as they choose a suspected terrorist and radical Imam who said that white people are the devil to speak at their convention.

 

And going against anti Islamic statements is bad and UnAmerican how?


Hate and terrorism has many different forms, It appears you do not understand nor acknowledge that hate, even the Timothy McVeigh kind of hate, is still hate. It is that type of mindset that has conservatives white nationalists crying wolf everymen the truth about Muslims tends to get out. The stereotypes of Muslims in this country is appalling. It is the same type of stereotypes about blacks, Japanese, Irish, and other minorities that had stained this county's honor, not upheld it.

 

I see i have to repeat myself again.

Their goal is to protect the image of the Prophet. Its that simple. Considering the attacks in Paris and the motivation behind them their conference was ill timed at best.

 

No, they do exist. Just because you don't see them on TV 24/7 does not mean they do not exist. They exist here in groups like Neo Nazi, Neo Confederate, and the Christian Identity Movement. One group, the H, is located outside Detroit Michigan. Christian Identity Movement is located in California, Arizona, and Utah. In India, you have the NLFI, who have committed acts of violence against Hindus in several Indian States. In Nigeria, YOu have the Army of God who have done just as much terrorism as Hakim.

 

Which terrorists are speaking at these conventions?


Islamic extremists are slaughtering thousands across the globe and your bizarre response is "well, uh, this one time...a Christian killed this one guy"....lol It is absolutely freaking PATHETIC how insane the radical liberal left has become to apologize for Islamic terrorism.

Blame Bush has become blame Christians....all over gay marriage...by the way Muslims murder people for being gay. FYI

 

Snarky is the MO for the 'usual suspects'.

reva