What if the Democrats hadn't have gotten us into Iraq?

Please cite which of the following quotes I've cited, with video sources, is not true. We look forward to your response.

- - - Updated - - -

Nope! Wrong again

Look at the dates of those quotes. Bill Clinton was not a GOP President.

Lol

 

Nice misrepresentation there. I never claimed that we didn't bomb Iraq. The thread obviously tries to pass on the blame for Bush's invasion to prior actions, so why does it fail to mention Bush II's daddy's invasion of Iraq?

 

Lol. He wasn't but bush was. Lol.

Admit it you're done.

 

What's this "we" stuff Tonto? You got a mouse in your pocket? I don't see anyone else trying to make it a democratic party war, do you?

 

This discussion has become circular. Later.

 

Blame Obama for the contents of the Downing Street Memo!

 

The Republicans were warned of 9/11 and ignored it. They will do anything not to acknowledge that it was their fault and they were asleep at the switch. I refer all their useless excuses for their treasonous negligence to just one question. Who was President when it happened?

 

That's a lie. You link me to anything where GW was told that planes were going to be used as weapons on our buildings specifically. Not they might do this or might do that. Specific intel that said 911 was going to happen. But Slick is on record saying he refused to take OBL out even though he knew of Project Bojinka in the mid 1990's.

 

I figured. Nice deflection. Care to continue to not answer?

 

Whats to answer? You're making this up as you go along with no basis in fact other than out of context quotes.

 

Your response makes no sense. Bush was not President in 1998. That was Democrat Bill Clinton.

I take it you didn't read the dates of the quotes. They start from 1998 and work their way up to 2002. Democrats war mongered until they got their wish, an invasion. Hildawg couldn't have voted "YES" quick enough!

- - - Updated - - -

Lol provide your evidence that this was "taken out of context". Cite your sources for such an outrageous claim. I've provided the VIDEOS of them calling for war. Beating the war drum. You are just holding your ears and crying "NOPE!". lol

 

I'm done. I can't deal with any more people who make up their own reality today.

 

I know you're done. You have not said anything of fact or value to dispute all of the Facts I've posted.

 

Over the course of a decade before George W. Bush came along, all of the heavyweight Democrats (Clintons, Kerry, Kennedys, Pelosi, etc.) were calling for the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. We were as well maintaining a costly no-fly zone over two thirds of Iraq before Bush became President.

 

Costly???? I nearly spit out my coffee!!!

"Costly"???? the cost of maintaining the no-fly zones was chump change compared to invading, conquering and occupying Iraq for a decade so we could disarm him of his enormous stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction which he didn't even have.

And those democrats were calling for the Iraqi people to rise up and overthrow Saddam. None of them were advocating invading, conquering and occupying Iraq with US forces... that was ALL Dubya's idea... with help from his PNAC buddies, of course.

 

Exactly right. The liberals are in full force trying to deny these facts.

 

how would the American people have responded if Clinton took out an entire Afghan village filled with innocent men and women in order to take out OBL for possibly plotting to do something that had not taken place? How would the REPUBLICANS have responded? I am sure they would have been applauding Clinton's bold aggressive foreign policy stroke....NOT!

 

You make a good point, however, the plan to kill OBL in the village was not by bomb, but by sniper. If anything, the only casualty would have been OBL.....

 

This thread is a pathetic excuse for rightwing dribble. I guess it is acceptable know to blatantly lie about (*)(*)(*)(*). How far is this forum gonna fall

 

not according to Clinton:

“I’m just saying, you know, if I were Osama bin Laden ... He’s a very smart guy. I spent a lot of time thinking about him. And I nearly got him once,” Clinton said in the audio, which was recorded by former Liberal Party head Michael Kroger and aired by Sky News.

“I nearly got him. And I could have killed him, but I would have had to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children, and then I would have been no better than him.

“And so I didn’t do it.”

http://abcnews.go.com/US/bill-clinton-hours-911-attacks-killed-osama-bin/story?id=24801422

 

My favorite: "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

 

but, I guess a clued in Army stud like you knows more about what happened in the White House 16 years ago than the guy who was president at the time

(*)(*)(*)(*)ing pathetic.

 

odd... but I didn't see the word "stockpile" in that quote. I wonder why???

in fact, NOTHING in that quote suggests that Saddam actually HAS any of those weapons, only that intelligence says he is trying to rebuild his capacity to make them.

 

I like how you only cited ONE time where Clinton could have killed him. "Twice snipers had him in his sights"

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dg...ts-he-chose-not-to-kill-bin-laden-before-911/

Clinton chose not to. He admitted it.

 

Wait. We quote Democrats, and you call it "rightwing dribble". Is there supposed to be a decoder ring that comes with you post?....because I didn't get one.