Are you really this dense? If these tapes exist then post a link to them. Pretty simple. Stop trolling.
I have asked and you have ducked the question and not provided any evidence for your contention except telling me that it exists. Maybe it exists in your tiny mind, but that doesn't work here champ. Provide a link to support your claims or admit you are wrong Pee Wee.
There were over 300 security cameras present at Dulles International at the time of the hijackings. They would have had several angles of the alleged hijackers as well as Barbara Olsen and the rest of the victims. Where is the footage from those cameras? Doesn't the public have the right to see the evidence? 3000 Americans were killed that day and evidence is being hidden from us.
I know I have NOT seen it and it has not been published as far as I know. If you have some PROOF, post a link that shows the tape. If not, we will all have to assume that you are full of crap.
Now he will retreat and stay off of these threads for six months to a year. After that he will come back and start the same argument claiming no such images or videos exist and refusing to acknowledge that it has been given to him.
Jack4 I have an old friend who is an airline pilot, and on that fateful day he was flying out of Newark airport, same place that UA93 departed from. What he noticed that morning was that on the course he was using, on his way to his flight which departed normally, the security checkpoints were unmanned, nobody was there. They knew it was coming.
No, it's the simple truth. At one concourse at EWR that morning, the security checkpoints were not manned. It was a well planned and executed false flag event. They knew it was coming because they planned it. Who is "they"? I sure don't know, but "they" were not 19 arabs with box cutters.
You have no evidence that they were not manned. You have a second hand story. Once again this is why twoofers always fail they have no evidence of any kind. It was not a false flag attack no no evidence OF ANY kind suggests it was. It was Arab hijackers with box cutters that is fact you cannot challenge
Yes, it is a second hand story, no question. But why should I doubt my friend? Why would he be making up such a story? He was not. To compare, why should I believe George Bush or Dick Cheney? If one studies false flag operations, this has all the signs of a false flag--wars were started in 2 different countries. It cannot be proved that those arabs were on board those flights, and the earliest lists provided to the public did not even include the names of the arabs. Oops! They were soon amended however.
Second hand stories are not evidence. It has no sign of a false flag which in and of itself is a conspiracy term which is BS. It has been proven over and over including ON THIS thread that they boarded those flights. That is fact and absolute fact the evidence has been produced time after time after time and you are stating a childish outright LIE to deny it
I admit I have been here only a short time and have not read all the posts. However, nobody ON THIS THREAD has proved that anybody at all boarded those flights, especially the fictitious hijackers. Indeed, early press reports failed to list those hijackers. In the court of public opinion, second hand stories ARE evidence. The preponderance of the facts and evidence contradict the official story. No airplanes where there should have been, perjury presented to the 911 commission, and on and on. The official story is false, and this has been known by perceptive people for years now.
Oh yes they have proven beyond any question that they boarded the flights and you have see the evidence. You are simply lying about that evidence. Early press reports are never accurate and any absence of information in EARLY reports is meaningless. The court of public opinion is a fools court and more often wrong than right which is why it is not a real court except for fools. There are no such facts as you claim contradicting the official story you only repeatedly claim that there is. The evidence on these very threads proves your claim wrong. The official story is proven by evidence and that is fact. You have no evidence disputing it
All I can say is that your standard for proof is much lower than mine. It is your prerogative to believe whatever sort of person you wish, but believing politicians such as Rumsfeld, Bush and Cheney leaves you with little credibility in my view. All the facts work against the official story, but if one is deeply in denial as you appear to be, nothing can be done. Have a good day.
Your standard of evidence includes second hand rumors you even defended the use of such standard Mine does not because my standard of evidence is higher. Evidence which would be included in court or in science is my standard you ignore such standards including any piece of fiction. Once again there are NO facts which work against the official story which is why you can post nothing but second hand BULL^%^$. I never quoted a politician so you lie claiming I believed them
Unless you were there all you have is a second/third/fourth hand story about what happened that day. After perusing all of the evidence years ago, I came to the obvious conclusion that these attacks were executed with a lot of help from insiders here in the US. The ridiculous yarn regarding 19 guys with box cutters is absurd. I really don't care if you or the rest of the brain dead here in the US buy it. Cheers
The operation that was executed on 9-11-01 was obviously a conspiracy. Do you even know what a conspiracy is? The question is: who was involved in the conspiracy? I think there is much more to it than we have been told. If you believe the 19 Arabs with box cutter theory, you are also a conspiracy theorist also, as 2 or more people acting in concert to commit a crime is a conspiracy by definition.