nope I did a search and no transcripts have been posted. I assume you know what a transcript is? I guess we will never know which ones since you wont post them. My bet is they cant be posted because they are imaginary?
pretty good trick! what did I see an hour ago? Here I thought this was getting into a discussion but its a comedy show! So whats the next joke?
Over the years you have seen them after asking for them. You then wait a while and pretended you never did. So now you have been proven wrong again
I'm new here, but it seems early on that you tend to bluff with your statements. If Rodriguez has changed his testimony as much as you say he has, why won't you provide some specifics? As I've already mentioned, I've seen video of his statements and read transcripts of his statements. I find them pretty darn consistent. I think you're bluffing.
One more time this is fact. They have been provided over and over by many for years now. You have seen them as well. Once again you ignore such evidence wait for a while and pretend you never saw it. It has been exhaustively proven and you are playing a childish and dishonest game. You are not new either
Well you should certainly know what I've been reading, I guess. Brilliant posters here, almost psychic.
When you keep rehashing the same old pabulum that's been discussed here over and over and over..... And yes,over,one doesn't need to be psychic
Yes, I've read most of the literature in print and on the net, so your snide comeback is of little value. I know you're not interested in any material that conflicts with your bias, but I tend to view as much material as possible from both sides of the argument, as it helps formulate a rational explanation. Something that the members of 9/11 truth seem to ignore.
Think on this for a second.. they use a single flow of something as evidence that thermite was used to cut the core columns. A single flow... on I think it is the 80th floor (never bothered to check which floor as that doesn't matter in this discussion). Lets assume that they are correct for the sake of this discussion and it was thermite that cut 35 floors x 49 columns. Do the math there sir and tell me that you actually believe that all of those columns were cut and there was only the single flow of whatever from one floor. Now check around and you find that that window where that flow came from might well be 50 feet from the column it supposedly flowed from, think about that and tell me honestly that you believe that a single flow came some 50 feet across the floor, all those columns cut and only the one single flow. I believe one of those guys actually claimed that a solid block of wood dropped upon a solid block of wood proved that those buildings couldn't have collapsed because the solid block of wood did not crush the block it was dropped upon. Mr Cole I think...
It looks like SOME SORT of explosion, that much is certain. All the other facts available, all the damage observed, suggest a nuclear event.
We KNOW where the collapse initiated,had the placed a nuclear bomb up on those floors,lower manhattan would still be picking up...
so what does an explosions look like? Give me the advanced technical academic version if you dont mind.
Yes much proves that there was no nuclear event as there is no evidence is a nuclear event and such explosions always leave a massive signature. There is no residue from a nuke
Maybe in your world, but to most people who have seen explosions, it looks like an explosion. It looks like an explosion because it WAS an explosion. A series of explosions, actually.
yeh but in the world of posers with regard to 911 and their incredulous state of denial nothing looks like an explosion. Especially an explosion. The lie is protected by gubmint who insured no tests were done.
