How to stop Islamic Terrorism

The two wars with Iraq and one with Afghanistan.

 

1. We need to stop all immigration until we become a cohesive, united American culture. I'm tired of hearing about hyphenated Americans. We all need to be Americans. All education will be in English. We need to promote American culture.

2. We need to seal our borders to stop immigrants, drugs, and terrorists. I'd like to see snipers every 1/4 mile shooting anything on wheels or 2 feet that crosses our border. We will also need ground troops to protect the snipers. Sealing the border will protect us, but it will also force Mexico to fix their problems instead of exporting them to us.

3. Get rid of the illegals. No government funds for helping or educating illegals. They will be deported as they are found and they can invite their families to leave with them if they want to stay together. The only freebie they should get is emergency room care and then deported as soon as they leave the hospital. Getting rid of the illegals will make it easier to spot anybody who doesn't want to be American.

3. We need to be energy independent. We need to be immune to OPEC and Middle East instability. Drill baby drill! on top of wind and solar.

4. All family members of domestic terrorist who are not American citizens will be deported and the terrorists assets will be seized to reimburse the families of their victims. Terrorism will be punished with the death penalty immediately after 1 appeal.

I know half of my points concern illegals, but we can't deal with terrorism until we are a united America.

 

WHAT?

Are you a Native American?

 

Those weren't terrorist attacks.

And America is not terrorist. You are just an America hater.

- - - Updated - - -

I am. I was born in California. That make me a native.

Do liberals have a solution to stop islamic terrorism, other than importing ISIS from Syria?

 

Islam does not offer such choices.

 

And yet, 100 years later, we are still fighting them.
Guess it didn't work.

- - - Updated - - -

Wipe out 25% of the world?

 

I'm a native Texan. I do have Choctaw Indian in my ancestory, but not enough to make money from the casinos.

My strategy is simple. If we don't let them into our country, they can't hurt us.

 

I don't think he has no intention to stop it.
I seen a post of his recently where he said something along the lines that their actions are justified.

 

Obviously he was just one person - it would take a more concerted effort this time.
When one's enemy in a world war believes in, say, magic "jinns", or a flying horse with a human head (like Muslims do), that's a huge weakness (the insanity of those beliefs) to exploit, if we are to win.
Although, uh, Obama has NEVER used the word "win" in this war, or "victory".

 

Only that Muslim knows if Allah has called them to Jihad, they believe, so it becomes hard for a Muslim to try to fight a fellow Muslim when he is fighting Jihad oversees - that's why we see more Muslims from outside the area JOINING The Islamic State than FIGHTING it. More British Muslims have joined The Islamic State than have joined the British army recently. Incredible.

 

Well genocide has been frowned upon in the past.
Wiping out 25% of the population isn't even realistic.

 

Didn't a crazy Christian shoot up a clinic just this week? If you're going to go after Muslims for being savages, gotta go after the Jews and Christians too or you're just being sectarian and not actually dealing with the problem (a bloodthirsty Canaanite storm god).

 

Sorry, I was advocating Black Jack's strategy, as just one thing to try (can't hurt), not wiping them out. I care for Muslims too much to want to slaughter them, but I'm not overly concerned about their illogical unscientific superstitions, however.


Genocide: "frowned upon"...hehe.
Actually, incredibly, Christians don't frown upon genocide, as when asked to condemn their invisible friend in the sky for committing genocide in his horrific "flood", or through Moses against those minority tribes, they won't condemn the invisible friend in the sky. To a Modern Secular Humanist this is nothing short of barbaric.
Those that do frown upon genocide are generally ex-Christians.

 

It could be done, and that is the right thing to do, but we will have to fully control our own government in order to learn that ideology. Our lawful and peaceful revolution will be needed because our government, the MIC covets secrecy and the scientific ideology will eventually defeat their secrecy so they will not allow it.

 

The secrecy is coveted by many factions of our infiltrated government, and opposed with murder by more than Muslims here.

In my local area there have been 22 people killed in mass murders over 14 years that were created in a similar way but different motivations. Basically the psychological state is created in Muslims and murderers here by abuses of the unconscious mind.

Muslims have an entire society helping to motivate them, here very specific psychological motivational structures must be created in the persons mind years prior when conditions are described that cause escalations when they are met. Conditional programming.

The infiltration of government did a bit of that on Muslims with 9/11 then used it to justify attacking Muslim nations. When Muslims there saw this for 10 years, they became ready to come here and commit terrorism.

Locally, the mass murders were compelled by exploiting various instincts. Sex mostly.

In 2001 the son of the producer of Ally Mcbeal used his saab900 to run over 4 people at 65mph in Isla Vista , a local college community. Major sexual frustration was at the root of his psychosis.

The shooting at the post office by a women of 2006 was the largest mass murder in American history by a woman, a lesbian.

In 2014 the son of an associate director of the hunger games killed 6 with knives and guns. Aspergers in the care of 2 psychologists completely concealed his intentions for years. Extremely sexually frustrated.

All of the killings were to try and compel effective mental health care direct to the unconscious mind. It is fully feasible they were trying to stop what is happening with Muslims now by compelling an understanding that would be the beginning of the "scientific ideology" you mention.

I saw what was happening, well before 2001 and did some research and determined where treatment direct to the unconscious mind begins.

This letter shows a de facto approval of such a treatment.


The "response in writing" was never gained because the county supervisors are servants of secrecy and the infiltration.

Five years later 3 grandmothers joined me in my second federal civil rights lawsuit to try and save their children and grandchildren with drug and alcohol problems.

A copy of the suit was given to a reporter at the largest local paper, within 2 weeks she was fired or resigned. Within 6 weeks 16 other reporters and editors joined her . They were all gagged by the local court so no one would learn why.


The lawsuit met with a secret change of the us district court local rules. An 1885 court rule providing a new magistrate and judge to a previously filed and dismissed pro se civil rights suit, re filed with new co plaintiffs was removed from the rules with no note of revision. A serious violation of the administrative offices of the us district court regulations. Only the Supreme Court can write rules and they separated the assignments of magistrates and judges from the main body of rules so only they section and a single page of the index needed to be removed to secretly remove the court rule.

Pages linked and associated with this page about the newspaper firings and gagging detail what the 9th circuit did.

http://algoxy.com/law/no_free_press/sbsecretsofmedia.html

This widely, deeply collusive support for governmental secrecy is why we need our lawful and peaceful revolution.

 

Yes, and then blame global warming.

 

Unless you kill all the roaches, they'll just keep coming back. War's aren't won with tit for tat fighting. In WWII we pounded Japan all they way back to their homeland, then pounded them into the ground like a tent stake until they raise the white flag and surrendered. Now after San Bernardino would be the time to send as many air worthy B-52, B-1's and F-111's and Flatten an ISIS controlled town. Then tell them for every attack within the U.S. we will carpet bomb one of their controlled areas.







Every time till ISIS surrenders.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War Those were innocent people who died from our actions for no good reason. That is terror!

 

There are 30,000 ISIS members.

You would kill millions of innocents ...

Yea...that makes sense...to conservatives I guess.

 

Lol! What a joke. You think dropping bombs out of the sky is going to stop religious fanaticism like SanBernardino and Colorado Springs?

 

Crazy is the operative word there.

 

How do you know they were innocent?

 

No. Forced conversion would be much more humane.

 

If we don't know, then why did we attack them?

- - - Updated - - -

Conversion to what?

 

Wouldn't the operative word "crazy" apply to Muslims too, seeing that both are guilty of religious attacks?