How to stop Islamic Terrorism

You can't stop Islamic terrorism.

But you can defend against it by restricting immigration and increased surveillance.

Islam needs to be pacified, but the West can't do that. Muslims love death more than we love life. Directly engaging with the enemy just gives them the martyrdom they crave.

What Islam needs is its own Thirty Years War. Let two generations of men kill each other in the ME and Africa, with its attendant deaths from famine and disease, and Islam will get heartily sick of violence and give it up for a couple of centuries at least. Future generations of Westerners can figure out how to drive a stake through the heart of that vile religion and pacify it for ever.

What the West needs to do is not accept any refugees; we hardly need to import their war. And keep the combatants at it. Don't let any of the many factions gain too much of an upper hand.

We are going to have to absorb some casualties in the form of terrorist attacks. It is unfortunate, but we are at war after all. But by all means we need to keep the fanatics killing each other, and not us.

 

And when Pakistan agrees to give Saudi Arabia nuclear weapons and they Saudis say "any attack on our cities as a result of Muslim terrorist attacks that we had nothing to do with with result in nuclear retaliation against Jerusalem and the Vatican", what do we do then?

- - - Updated - - -

That little piece doesn't mention the real "winning strategy" in the Phillipines:

Pershing ordering his men to gather up thousands of Moro women and children and put them in concentration camps where huge numbers died of disease and starvation.

 

Western philosophy committed suicide. We are all nihilists now. That is why we are vulnerable to opportunistic infections like Islam.

This is most easily seen in the Progressive insistence that radical Islamic terrorism doesn't actually exist.

 

There are 3 times that many Daesh members.

What about those who support them, fund them, help them out, hide them, and are related to them. Or do you consider them innocent too?

Does it make sense to kill those who do all of that?

 

Make sure the use of Napalm is in effect. They cannot attain paradise nor spend any time with Allah. If they have no physical body.

Let them melt into a puddle of goo.

 

In general, two things:
Identify the ideas that inspire jihad (Islam's clear commands to fight and subdue the infidel) and oppose it.
Present a rational philosophy of reason and freedom as an alternative.

 

Because sane people blow themselves up and fly planes into buildings, right?

 

Speak for yourself. I can stop it right now.

 

We then turn 2 areas of the Planet called Earth, into Glass Parking lots. Any questions?

 

Well, then, by all means, stop it right now!

 

It is the gays fault. WOW. Do people really believe this tripe?

 

And they turn several million, or perhaps tens of millions (depending on what cities in India Pakistan attacks) of people into ashen shadows because someone (I'm not naming names but it might be you) was such a massive idiot as to think bombing cities full of innocent people for the crimes of completely unrelated people was a good idea.

 

ITT Americans who can't solve their own domestic issues like gun violence and racial tension / crime but think they can solve the worlds most complex problems.

 

You've just outlined the best way to make terrorism exponentially worse.

 

That would depend on your definition of terror attack.

First you must ask yourself what is the purpose of a terror attack?

The answer seems obvious to me. In a war it is a long term strategy to defeat the enemy by instilling enough fear and doubt in their population that you divide them politically and destroy their political will to wage the war they are engaged with you.

To that end a person could argue that indiscriminate bombing of civilian targets as proposed by you, and done in the past, Hanoi, Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki etc., could and would be classified as terror attacks. What we found is that instead of destroying the political will of the our enemies it strengthened until we made the cost so horrible that it eventually led to political demise we sought.

So the question to you is are you prepared to go that far? Are you prepared to not just bomb these places but annihilate them with nuclear weapons.

A second question...are you prepared to engage in the same terror tactics employed by our enemies in order to defeat them? Does that make us the same as them?

On a different note reading through many of these threads and the reaction of many of the conservative politicians is fomenting the political divide that our enemy is attempting to achieve through terror attacks.

 

I'll just snap my fingers..

Did it work??

 

I don't follow. What could possibly be more suitable than the will of God?

 

Right? They had to have been guilty, because we did attack them.

The religion of peace...Christianity.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes, it works in this one case singularly, and in the case of all muslims, always.

 

But you want Christians to indiscriminately bomb civilians in cities where terrorists aren't even from.

How is that peaceful?

 

This answer comes from my Cuzins in Semper FI.

NO......we adapted, improvised. Hoo-rah!

 

Nuke 'em for making a nuclear threat.

- - - Updated - - -

No, that would be crazy muslim people.

 

And while our nukes are flying, their nukes are flying and only because certain people (one with a screen name something like "Nationalist Reporting") were stupid enough to think knee jerk emotional reactions and attacking cities full of innocent people is a good idea we have tens of millions of people dead and terrorism increases due to the outrage.

 

not according to the OP.

 

Yep, "peaceful" Christians prefer murdering people from 30,000 feet.

 

We could go on picking away at them forever. Using your philosophy we'd still be fighting Japan from 1941. How can 30,000 control such a large area and so many people? One only needs to look at WWII (the last time we actually won a war) to see what it took to get a fanatical group complete with Kamakazi's to surrender. Anything short of that and it will continue in perpetuity. There is no magic lolly pop you can give them as a peace offering. Do you think you can talk out our differences? How exactly do you negotiate with fanatics that saw live peoples heads off with a rusty knife? How many San Bernardino's will it take before you realize they're not going to stop..........until you make them stop?