High School Boy Wins All-State Honors In Girls Track And Field

This is the part where I say that facts are nothing more then social constructs that don't actually exist. Nothing exists outside our minds. Basically existentialism. It's not ridiculous, it's going the step deeper. Even your "facts" have a philosophy behind them. Simply asking what that philosophy is and what justification you have for the reasoning is now "ridiculous"?

I don't see why not.

Not too sure what Liberals have to do with this. I thought we were discussing existentialism.

 

Have you ever watched Rick and Morty? Basically I live in Rick's world.

- - - Updated - - -

If that's Donald Trump's wall then you're damaging US property. Please cease and desist otherwise we'll start building a wall to keep the Dutch out.

- - - Updated - - -

Indeed they did. They made a commitment and I'm glad for those that ran kept to it.

 

A strawman or arguing against biology determining a person's life? That's all this argument is. Nature vs. Nurture. Which of the two is more important? Hence why it seems hard to understand why anyone would make the biological argument. It has no basis in determining what social constructs a person has. Only the perception of biology has any effect in "real life". Even then that doesn't touch upon biology.

- - - Updated - - -

So then why do we have them in the first place? What purpose does it serve?

- - - Updated - - -

She beat her peers. Good for her.

- - - Updated - - -

Our knowledge of Biology doesn't exist. Only perceptions of biology exist which give rise to Truth. That's demeaning when used to discriminate against another person.

- - - Updated - - -

Prove it. Actually prove anything is real.

- - - Updated - - -

So a person who loses their penis is no longer male? Then how do you explain David Reimer?

 

you do realize some of those things you listed are optional right.... some are not always true....

there are some differences genetically, but we do not need to go overboard....

.

 

Typically != every time. Prove to me that she had an unfair genetic advantage. Genes don't just determine a person's athletic ability. Plenty of things influence a person's abilities in life, genes are just one factor.

- - - Updated - - -

They weren't punished, they competed and lost. That's all it is.

 

Who is this she you keep speaking about?

 

The only thing that could be considered optional is to have babies or not, but that doesn't change the fact that womens bodies have the ability to be pregnant (assuming no medical issue as I know you will say that) whereas mens bodies do not and cannot. Nothing else is optional.

 

I'm as American as you are, sir. In fact, I'm probably three times more American than you are, for at one point in time, I held three valid US passports simulteniously.

You figure it out how' it's possible

 

Her name is Nattaphon "Ice" Wangyot. She is the subject of this thread.

- - - Updated - - -

Really? I could have sworn I had seen you with a Dutch flag before.

 

some do, not all have that ability... the point is, there is a dna difference... is that enough to segregate the genders though

 

The bolded part says it all.

 

I am saying D's didn't do this all by themselves as some have tried to claim. So that means their are some R's that have an understanding of humanity.

 

Don't worry. I am not jumping or stomping.
But I will still call there is no clear cut between male/female. Heck, some are born with both parts. It is a tiny %, but those are the facts.

 

So is schizophrenia, but that hardly implies any obligation on society to mainstream its victims.

No, what would be fair is for the school to insist that immigrants adapt to American culture rather than the reverse.

 

One of the things being left out of this debate is the matter of accommodation. In order to accommodate this boy a woman had to be un-accommodated. And because this boy won the best girl track runner also had to be un-accommodated. Going beyond this story, we can take this out into the PC world where in order not to offend someone it's acceptable to offend far more people. The only trend in any of this is that liberals seem to have no problem offended or un-accommodating the status quo while catering to those they perceive as victims (all while forgetting about the victims they created when they went all in on political correctness)

 

We shouldn't tolerate those who hear voices in their heads either? You know many people claim they do. Some have daily conversations with a god.

 

Maybe all the boys that can't get on the boys team should claim they "feel" like they are a girl and get on the girls teams. Before long, the girls teams will be just another level for the boys, like varsity-junior varsity-junior junior varsity (formerly girls teams).

Turn the tables on the PC, diversity, LGBT lunatics.

Nice payback for all the Title 9 BS, too.

 

Need some cheese to go with that whine?
Few on the right care 1 iota about victims.

 

No words can fix this much ignorance.

 

If you can't handle facts why do you bother posting?
Are so ignorant you've never heard of hermaphrodites?

Save yourself the embarrassment and don't answer.

 

What? Many of us who oppose this nonsense are defending the girls, the real girls, against unfair competition. Those girls are the victims.

 

I presented facts, you presented absolute nonsense

 

No, my friend. And even though I've spent a good number of years living in Amsterdam, I've never held Dutch citizenship

 

Huh, the more you know about people. I'm glad I got to learn that about you.

 

But you don't really care. It's just RW talking point of the month.
Many RWers only care that they got what they got and the heck with everyone else.