“The UK is Never Going to be White Again”

Something about the family on the beach reminded me!

#

Taken this afternoon on Newquay Fistral Beach, I call it Britain will Never be white again!

 

I'm not a nationalist, by any stretch, but I do not disdain nationalists for their ideology. A lot of people are proud of their cultural heritage, the color of their skin, their religion - whatever it is.

I used to claim that these people where misguided idiots not worthy of reply - but, that is counter to the tolerant message of modern day liberalism.

See, here's the thing. Modern Day Liberalism is a crock of (*)(*)(*)(*) and an abject failure. It is so hard on for being hard up on the US, for example, while propping up the façade of peace in defense of savage Islam, for example. Its a derelict hulk drifting along currents of blame shifting, skirting it with tolerance while breeding intolerance of what they claim is intolerance.

It's a giant travesty.

Do I care what color the skin is of some people 3,000 miles across an ocean miles deep? No, I do not.

But some of those people do give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about their culture and the way they perceive it. Why some folks believe they have a moral high ground to shout down these people is beyond me.

 

Yes, intolerance of intolerance. I readily admit and have numerous times on this board to being bigoted against neo nazis, white nationalists, jew haters, holocaust deniers, commies, religious fanatics of all faiths, run o the mill racists and pedophiles, regardless of their "colour/ethnicity". With the exception of pedophiles, my other bigotries are all ideological, not genetic or ethnic.

 

You're wrong.



Nazi (also the cognates Nazism and Neo-Nazism) is a political epithet invented by Konrad Heiden (7 August 1901 – 18 June 1966) during the 1920s as a means of denigrating the NSDAP and National Socialism.[1] Heiden was a journalist and member of the Social Democratic Party of Germany, whose mother was a Jewess.

The term is both an imitation of the nickname given to Marxists of the SDP at the time, Sozi, and a political pun similar to the Austro-Bavarian word for "simpleton", derived from the fairly common name Ignatz (German language form of Ignatius). It was then popularised abroad by various Judaics and other subversives, including Heiden himself, who fled the country after the NSDAP were elected to government.

The term was regarded as a derogatory epithet by National Socialists and was used almost exclusively by Marxist agitators. Typically the use of Nazi Germany, and Nazi regime, was popularized by Jewish émigrés from Germany after 1933., especially in English-speaking countries. From them, it spread into other languages.

Friedrich Hollaender - "We call them 'Nazis' just to (*)(*)(*)(*) them off"

[video=youtube;Jwk2zU_cjCw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jwk2zU_cjCw[/video]

 

NAZI is an acronym.

they are Nazis, and will forever be Nazis.

 

Call it what you want, but the National Socialists never called themselves "Nazis".

 

Nazi feelings don't bother me.

They murdered my people, and they are now all in Hell.

 

Aha... so you are part Jewish yourself? Now I understand why this is quite the controversial material for you.

Could you explain to me why on the one hand +- 150.000 Jews fought in the German army, of which there were

- 2 field marshals
-15 generals
- 2 full generals
- 8 lieutenant generals
- 5 major generals

Who commanded approx. 100.000 troops?

Jews Who Served In Hitlers Army

[video=youtube;cfEJrzWssqg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfEJrzWssqg[/video]

Because it doesn't really add up to have all these Jews fighting with the Germans, while on the other hand millions of them being 'murdered' now does it?

 

Well you could accidentally be living in a mud hut beating on bongo drum with bone through your nose. Figure it out.

 

You're too touchy to be a Nazi.....

Play an Israeli for a week in this forum it will toughen your skin

 

It's tears of joy, it's not every day I talk to a Nazi cartoon be honest, do you have a barn with guns and the confederate flag hanging ? and your cousin....is she worth it?

 

Nope... I am not wrong. As usual you are doing the revisionist trick of using half truths to peddle your bull(*)(*)(*)(*).
You were given the correct explanation.
Here it is again;

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=Nazi

 

All good and nice website you found there, but the National Socialists never called themselves "Nazis", as it was a derogatory term used by the allies.

 

You'd rather might take a look at this:

[video=youtube;St2sM1TwEx4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St2sM1TwEx4[/video]

 

Try reading it again. It was used before the allies even existed.

 

Maybe, but they didn't call themselves Nazis. There's not 1 recording of it, neither is there any mention of it in Mein Kampf.

 

As the quote says the Nazi's did try to use it themselves but gave up.

Do try reading.

 

Hence my point about being hypocritical. The issue here is that being nationalistic is not something negative, it's simply a different perspective. You can choose to either be a (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) about it and shout people down because heaven forbid they don't fit the tolerant BS narrative of modern day liberalism, or you can choose to work together toward a common solution.

The way I see it, there are barbarians of a certain flavor who enjoy beheading people, blasting them point blank in the face with shotguns, dropping large rocks on their heads, burning them alive, etc, knocking on the British door so to speak. People are -allowed- to be afraid.

I read a book, Inside the Jihad, by Omar Nasiri. In it he describes muslim clerics in the UK claiming "they will eventually breed out" the Europeans, and that there was no need for direct violence.

Funny how that seems to actually be happening. People are proud of their heritage. As misguided as one may find it, they're entitled to that opinion, and you can't tell them they aren't.

I know it's generally easier for people to label them as Nazi, or anti-Semitic, or racist, etc.

But, please do continue doing so. It advances the tolerance narrative so well.

Modern liberalism - forced multiculturalism at the end of a gun barrel.

 

The question that should be asked every time this issue is raised is: Why the **** should anyone care what color anyone is????

 

Not from your head for sure.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race

 

That is a policy of progressives.

 

Yes some did that & many are now regretting that decision. I look forward to the elections in Spring 2017 & to see Angela Merkel thrown out on here @rse. We had the same with Tony B. Liar a few years back & he has now created a diversive society, due to mass immigration.

Historicaly Britian (not sure about Germany, although Turks have been welcome) has a long history of accepting numbers of immigrants (in Brition say 40-50K per year) and we have generally been happy with those figures & the immigrants have on the whole bee accepted & integrated within our society.

Now we have figures approaching X10 those figures on an annual basis. So even a pea brain can see that this massive jump in immigration will have an impact on our society & if some stand up and argue that the rate is now too high I don't think it is fair to call them racist or ignorant for their views.

 

Not sure what you mean by that. Are you a progressive? Do the progressives you know say that they don't care what color anyone is? An awful lot of progressives say or imply that color does matter. They focus on the color of people shot by cops and sympathize with (and protest on behalf of) the black ones only.

 

Well, I agree that there are some folk out there that have a perverse middle age psychopathic faith but I do not subscribe to a blanket condemnation and the facts on the ground bear that out.

The war on isis is being fought and at this point beating the stuffings out of what remains of ISIS. Over 45,000 ISIS fighters have died and its mainly due to ARAB and KURD forces including IRAQI ARMY UNITS finally organized and trained up to a decent combat standard. We now have the Turks shelling the crap out of ISIS positions near the Turkish border and that is inspite of Erdogan's pique at Kurdish military units being equiped and trained AND enjoying some military success.

Its a MUSLIM war against ISIS, not an American war. ISIS kills hundreds if not thousands of muslims for each "westerner they kill" in cowardly terrorist attacks. The caliphate will soon be extinct and then there is just the syrian civil war to contend with - you know the one where Donnie's pal Vladdie is bombing the crap out of Assad's enemies and Shia Iran is helping out anyway they reasonably can.

ISIS is not a threat to American ideology or overall national security. It is a threat to launch terrorist attacks, but then they aren't the only batcrap crazy psycho murderers out there. They aren't anywhere near the threat that some batcrap crazy psycho white boy or brown boy or black boy with a semi-auto large cap mag or two shot the crap outta a mall or school poses, if statistics are to be believed.

Obama's strategy is working and when ISIS is done, there will be a viable Iraqi army under civilian authority, capable of defending its borders and defending its people.

Donnie's assessment of what is a "disaster" demonstrates just how little he actually knows. He's just isn't qualified nor fit for the job.




So don't confuse tolerance with an understanding of what and who the actual problem is.

 

Exactly my point. Shytte happens.