It was a handful of leftist insiders who finally got utterly disgusted with the over the top corruption of their own party's leadership and who fed information directly to WIKILEAKS. That's what the CIA and the FBI know but will not admit under the rule of the Obama administration. Once Obama and his sleazebags are out of office, however, then the real truth will begin surfacing.
does the alt left really think they are going to get a do over for a election where the GOP won 30 of the 50 States? The election is over, grow up deal with it and see if you can figure out where you went wrong Democrats then try again in 2020
Me too. Once in a while I tune into one of the MSM networks just to see what kind of fake news they are peddling and assume the opposite is true.
Very good points. If only the Hillaryites could see how rabid and desperate they look from our house. I can't wait to hear the next wild accusation.
Nice try, you lose again. Clinton was one of the worse candidates that the democrats fixed her win. She spent $1.2 billion only to get her ass handed to her one more time. >>>MOD EDIT Flamebait Removed<<< http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/johnwright/russia_also_hacked_rnc_but_didn_t_release_emails "One senior government official, who had been briefed on an F.B.I. investigation into the matter, said that while there were attempts to penetrate the Republican committee’s systems, they were not successful," the NYT reports. "But the intelligence agencies’ conclusions that the hacking efforts were successful, which have been presented to President Obama and other senior officials, add a complex wrinkle to the question of what the Kremlin’s evolving objectives were in intervening in the American presidential election."
Wrong again. http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/johnwright/russia_also_hacked_rnc_but_didn_t_release_emails "One senior government official, who had been briefed on an F.B.I. investigation into the matter, said that while there were attempts to penetrate the Republican committees systems, they were not successful," the NYT reports. "But the intelligence agencies conclusions that the hacking efforts were successful, which have been presented to President Obama and other senior officials, add a complex wrinkle to the question of what the Kremlins evolving objectives were in intervening in the American presidential election." - - - Updated - - - One more time for those who refuse to accept the facts "One senior government official, who had been briefed on an F.B.I. investigation into the matter, said that while there were attempts to penetrate the Republican committees systems, they were not successful," the NYT reports. "But the intelligence agencies conclusions that the hacking efforts were successful, which have been presented to President Obama and other senior officials, add a complex wrinkle to the question of what the Kremlins evolving objectives were in intervening in the American presidential election."
The NY Times is the original fake news outlet. While millions of Ukrainians and other non Russians literally starved to death under Joe Stalin the NY Times was busy reporting what a "worker's paradise" it was. Not much has changed over time. They still lie as naturally and repetitively as most people breathe.
Hillary got the debate questions before the debates. If the Russians helped Trump they should have given him the debate questions before hand.
If these accusations are true they far exceed anything Nixon resigned over in 1972, as well as anything Hillary was even accused of. We are talking about the possible interference in our democratic process by a foreign power and that would be an Act of War. If Trump helped this, and since he actually said the Russians should do just this in a speech it seems a reasonable suspicion he might have, then that is the Constitutional definition of Treason. Why do you take the possibility of Treason by a POTUS so lightly?
Which does not change the fact that Donald Trump is President elect partly due to the efforts of the intelligence services of a traditionally hostile foreign power, one who's bidding your ilk are all to happy to do! Oh, and since you could not deny the facts (and didn't even bother to try), you could try answering the question. What are you and your ilk going to say when Russia pushes Trump's buttons?
Ah yes...the unidentified "senior government official"! A most ubiquitous fellow who will say anything off the record the left would like him to. How convenient it all is.
In some states but since he won 50% more of the popular votes what's your point? Just specious Nah-Nah-Nah's? So care to reconcile your statements of fact the Russians did not hack her private email system because the FBI said they had no direct evidence and your statement of fact they did even though the FBI says they have no evidence they did.
Hillary's gang rigged the primaries, gave her the debate questions and $1.2 Billion, she lied countless times to everyone, she said that she was going to put the coal workers out of work, refused to campaign in the Rust Belt States, and called half the nation deplorable people. And she won the popular vote. So if the Russians helped Trump they didn't do very much. It's a BS issue.
I really find astonishing the level of depravity American liberals would go to in order to justify their defeat. Get over it, Americans don't want you. They had enough. We're witnessing an alliance between neocons and liberals. All those Bush warmongers ended up together with Hillary;s supporters. Amazing. Would liberal hypocrites ever address the proven high treason committed by Obama and Hillary. They let the real American enemies completely infest the U.S administration, the Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood penetrated all US national security agencies.
What action and what public action especially? Whoever hack and got these private citizen emails did NOT attack the Unites States Government, they hacked a private organization. Should the government take action against Wikileaks? Remember the DNC staffer who leaked some emails? This isn't about any asserted but unsupported claims of hacking, this is about not accepting the election results and trying to de-legitimize the Trump presidency and blame some one else for their loss. - - - Updated - - - It says Trump is more efficient.[/QUOTE]
Just a little reminder, Hillary Clinton will not be POTUS http://www.timeanddate.com/countdow...20T00&msg=Time left until Obama leaves office
[/QUOTE] What should be a lot more worrying is why none of the almost certainly hacked thousands of Hillary's e-mails haven't surfaced yet? Our adversaries are siting on many of not so guarded American secrets... why?
They don't have Trump buttons. They're sitting on a thousands of Hillary's buttons, and she's not in charge. Doh....
I don't care who outed all the Hillary -DNC corruption and I dont care why, " The truth shall set you free" - - - Updated - - - I'm upset about the DNC corruption and you are upset about who or what exposed it. Truth won Hillary lost
Sure it did, between the campaign and the press and between officials in the government and their dirty tricks campaign......lots of it.