Public safety issue. Hard to second guess Berkeley officials on this. Nothing to see here. Move along, folks.
Not at all especially when the Berkeley police have shown complete and utter disdain for public safety. Free speech and freedom to hear others is not suspended when OTHERS react violently. that is precisely the time to speak loudly.
He's not as funny as John was. Do you think LARKers will run faster this time and have their men fight?
The "for profit business" unless it is a Corporation, is owned by individuals. So you are saying the government can force those individuals to violate their conscience?
Of course we are off topic and I apologize. I have seen lengthy video of a reporter going into Muslim Bakerys posing as a Gay in search of wedding cakes. They were outright refused in every instance. Of course that is OK with Progressive types. They just don't like Christians. As far as "interpretation of scripture"..... it can't be any clearer as to what it says. Are you of the Bill Clinton mold, still trying to figure out what the meaning of is is????
Student group says it will reject the admins new offer. Berkeley added demands, moved venue, and scheduled for Sept. Coulter says she's coming as originally scheduled. Dares Berkeley to arrest her. Sincerely hope conservative students are prepared to vigorously defend their rights, and themselves.
Kidding aside, this is going to end badly folks, and it's entirely preventable. Blood will be on the hands of the corrupt city administrators who let it happen. I do not want another Kent State in my lifetime.
It's been coming since the Trump riots started. The interesting development here is that the beatdown took place in the heart of Berkeley.
It is a public space, the group that is sponsoring the event has to be given equal access and she cannot be denied the speaking roll because the administrators do not like her political opinion. So if they pay the required fees and apply on the schedule like any other group........
Interestingly, her book Adios America goes into exactly that, how since 1948 a majority of white men in America have not voted for a democratic presidential candidate, which was what led the horrid national democratic party to begin their mass importation of poor south americans, who they felt would be more likely to support the large government programs the dems wanted. Poor latinos would be dependent upon big government/welfare, unlike the northern europeans from where most of america at the time came from, who disdained large government and believed in self support and individual responsibility. She covers this in significant detail and backs up her comments with a massive amounts of facts.
So once again it is fair game to attack a conservatives woman's looks........right? But dare utter a word about a liberal woman.............and?