UNESCO Passes Resolution Critical of Israeli Conduct in Jerusalem and Gaza

Misinforming the forum AGAIN, Dutch ?

Rumor is that they're going to demolish each others houses.

 

I am talking about the video that proves your claim to be false. You know that the soldiers did not intend for her to be attacked by the dog and immediately came to her aid. The video clearly shows it.

Since the truth doesn't properly demonize Israelis, you use Pallywood tactics to distort what really happened and claim that she was targeted even though you know it is false. If jurors are free to decide, shouldn't they get the full story; not just a screen shot? The only evidence you have provided is that you are a fraud.

 

You mean that the neoZionist fascists' attack dog attacked the wrong woman ?
You have no idea of your image , do you ?

 

I watched the video. Why do you call others cowards, but are afraid to post the actual video that goes with your intentionally misleading screen shot? Facts don't concern you; you are focused on demonizing Israel. This is the only topic you post about. You, (like the dog), have it wrong.

 

In your delirium of IOF worship- which woman was the dog intended to attack ?

Tell me, did this attack take place in Israel or in Palestine ?
Was this woman in her homeland or in Israel ?

 

You tell us; its your post to back up. Please show which part of the full video backs up your claim.

 

How does a ' full video ' of an illegal incursion into Palestine with attack dogs and the intent to mutilate Palestinians help your fascist cause ?



Perhaps you think that the attack dogs were out on ' walkies ' ?

 

no, you deny and disregard international law as it suits your purposes.

this is why billions of people hate the Israeli govt.

cause they lie and steal

 

The full video proves your claim is a fraud. "Attack dog set upon woman." That is why you refuse to post it.

 

The picture published by the Independent, and only by the Independent, seemed a bit odd to me. A woman knocked down with a bunch of photographers around but nobody else in the middle of a violent scuffle between so many people? Used exif on the picture. It says "CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v80), quality = 75". Google tells me that this is an image created using the GD Graphics library. Not genuine, it seems. Maybe I'll contact Andrea Valentino, credited for the picture, for further details (couldn't find it on his twitter account).

I know there were clashes between orthodox and Women of the Wall, but apparently those weren't violent enough for the Independent.

 

I only follow international law and the UN Charter in particular.

 

no, you ignore international law and the UN charter.

you even ignore the Palestine Mandate.

as does the Israeli govt.

now i understand why soo many people hate the Israeli govt, and im even starting to understand how the israeli govt. fuels anti-semitism.

though its not real a shock that constant lies and deceit by the racist neo-zionist govt would fuel anti-semitism

 

Sure- in Zion-world its just a woman taking a nap. It's also fashionable to have an attack-dog hanging off your arm and no self-respecting person hasn't been photographed being beaten on the streets by a gang of Arabs dressed up as drooling neoZionist thugs.

UNESCO deserves congratulations for its stance against Israeli fascism- in the face of all manner of threats by Israeli fascists and their agencies.

 

There are at least 5 photographers taking pictures of the woman, but any mention of both the woman and a picture of her from any angle are missing from all the articles written about the clashes. Only the Independent published the picture. Why?

The photos about the dog, the arm, and the hanging:


It was published by AP, with the caption:
"An Israeli army dog attacks a Palestinian woman as soldiers try to stop it during an army raid in the West Bank village of Obadiyah, near Bethlehem, Wednesday, March 21, 2007."
http://www.pressdemocrat.com/csp/me...at/News/story.csp?cid=2143604&sid=555&fid=181

AP also published the picture you posted, with the caption:
"An Israeli army dog attacks a Palestinian woman during an army raid in the West Bank village of Obadiyah, near Bethlehem, Wednesday, March 21, 2007. The dog, which was supposed to enter a house with troops searching for a wanted militant, attacked the female bystander instead. The woman received medical attention from the troops on the scene."
http://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/photos-of-the-day-21-3-07/

Think, moon. The woman seems to be alone with the soldiers at the time of the attack, but she obviously wasn't, since there was at least one photojournalist at the scene (Kevin Frayer, credited by AP, but Lusa also has a picture of the incident). Do you seriously believe that the soldiers would set a dog on a helpless woman in the presence of photojournalists?

You lost me here.

 

' Searching for a wanted militant ' were they ? A method of ethnic cleansing similar to telephoning residents of Gaza to tell them that their house is about to be bombed. They just turn up unannounced , kick in your door , set dogs on the occupants and shoot anybody that resists as a ' terrorist '.

The dogs were there to savage Palestinians. The savaging is supposed to take place out of sight. One got photographed on the job.

NeoZionist fascism at work.

 

If you did that, than you would support the immediate return of all the Palestinians who lived in Israel back in Israel at the expense of the Jewish immigrants. Because that is what it means that the civil rights of the indigenous population is protected. International law also says all the settlements in East Jerusalem, Golan and the West Bank are illegal. So you should be supporting for the complete removal of all Israeli civilian live there.

But as far as I can see. You only support the international law and the UN Charter when there is something in it for a Jew, and not for anybody else.

 

Really? I thought it was the wall of fortress anthonia.

 

I only follow international law and the UN Charter in particular.

 

By this definition almost every muslim country is "apartheid" since muslims have more rights in their countries as their legal systems are founded on sharia.

But of course, you prefer that not be mentioned, right?

 

Shall i remind you that the interior minister does not write laws for the country? That Israel is a parliamentary democracy? Do you really want me to bring up quotes from arafat, abbas and hamas - who are the pal arab leaders?

 

Show us your long list of posts criticising arab muslim countries and iran for their mis-treatment of minorities and christians.

Can't wait.

 

You should not be talking, you really never have much of value to offer other than "jews bad, arabs are victims" tripe.

 

Who gave the arab muslims the right to move from egypt, jordan and syria into the mandate in the late 19th and early 20th centuries?

Who gave muslims the right to march into europe by the millions from 2015 forward?

 

The arab muslims show no one else respect in the mideast, a place you've probably never even been to.

For the record, it is typically the least knowledgeable about the mideast and have zero connection to it that rant like this totally non-credible poster on so frequent a basis.

Otherwise, they'd be complaining about the work and rights laws that single out pal arabs in syria and egypt, or the slaughtering and mass rapes of Yazidis, the bombings of Coptics in egypt, or the oppression and ethnic cleansing of chaldeans out of iraq and maronites from lebanon. They'd be mentioning the bombings of pal arabs by assad in syria, and the expulsions of pal arabs by qatar, iraq and kuwait.

But then like I said, parrots who constantly squawk "jews bad, arabs good" and have zero connection/knowledge of the mideast are the loudest sloganeers with absolutely nothing of value to offer.

 

Like I said, you should talk.

Feel free to display the rulings by the US congress condemning otter hunters in Canada. Makes as much sense as the garbage posts you provide on the mideast.