Now that's rich. I'm French, and lived in France for my entire life. Gonna teach me about my own country? Go ahead... Of course it is. For example, while Hutu supremacists were happily genociding millions of people in Rwanda and then in Congo over an ideology purely based on racial superiority, a few Blacks and Arabs in France got called mean names. Indeed French racism is the bane of this world. Indeed. Every year, minorities in ghettos riot and burn cars. Happens on any major public holiday. It's like a championship, the ghetto that burns the most cars wins. Also, just like BLM, they sometimes riot on "poor victims of racist cops", only to have their narrative debunked a week later and the guy being a thug who caused the incident. Oh wait, they also complain about getting controlled by the cops too much. I wonder, why would cops be more wary about the country's hotbeds of crime, can only be pure skin hatred. Let's have a riot over that. Ghettos failing are whitey's fault...right. I mean, I have some teacher friends who are scared for their life going there and have to spend all their time policing and not teaching, and still do it for a garbage salary because it's their vocation, but hell. White racism is what makes them fail, because black and brown people have no agency and no responsibility for what they do at all. You're talking about *forced* assimilation here. Taking children against the will of their parents, and cutting them off from their families. Where did I ever advocate that? Completely different thing, so it's just guilt by association. For the same reason Asia is generally pretty successful and Africa isn't. Again, you're bringing up slavery, but there was no slavery in Europe, yet there are similar problems in modern-day Europe as well. So you'll have to find something else. Wanting a Malian immigrant to adopt French culture doesn't destroy Malian culture since it persists in Mali. On the other hand, turning France into a multicultural nation destroys French culture period. For example, Macron said that French culture doesn't exist. You're the only ones who want to destroy cultures here. 1) Show your data 2) Defending your country's culture is about identity, not superiority. Superiority is irrelevant.
What is it? Simply Mother Nature producing humans who are more skin cancer resistant. Form follows Function in all things.
America was actually a very anti-European culture from the Pilgrims on. American exceptionalism, is defined, for the most part, by the hostility and suspicion most Americans have had for the state - at least until the end of the wilderness.
Your statement reveals you have no idea of the interrelationship of the colonies with the Mother Country. Good heavens, Ddyad, go study some history.
And you dismiss white nationalist crimes by hitler, kkk, etc. So i think that purs you ib the lead in terms of crimes.
Except blacks are much more likely to get other kinds of cancers than whites are, as well as other diseases. They have a lower life expectancy than whites. How does a lower life expectancy benefit humanity? Just admit you have a thing for dark skin. That would be very progressive.
Nope. Mexico is spreading upward, so the US would be an extension of that country and the rest of the Hispanic 3rd world
Thanks for the obvious geography lesson. Next week I look forward to your talks on the location of Burma
There are plenty of Americans who don't know much about the US, so let's not pretend you being French makes you an expert. As you mentioned riots, violence, car burnings, etc. are quite common in the banlieue. You even go on in your post to mention the failing ghettos in France, you think that those ghettos exist and fail because the French society doesn't segregate it's poor brown people? Is the standard for terrible racism now genocide? If the french don't commit genocide they don't have serious problems with racism? Is that really your argument? Here is an article about recent rise in racist incidents in France: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...-against-Muslims-and-Jews-soar-in-France.html Cultural adaptation is a two-way street. The goal should for American immigrants to see themselves as Americans and to value the things that make America the country it is. Freedom of speech, democracy, freedom of religion. I don't give a **** if they teach their kids arabic and don't become christians. In fact like I mentioned christians haven't demonstrated that they are such wonderful people in the US anyhow. Christians are responsible for the majority of hate crimes and the majority of terrorism is the US. Asians, Muslims, Black Immigrants, I could go on, all commit crimes at lower rates than American Christian men. Here is some info for you about immigrants in general: http://www.businessinsider.com/immi...han-native-born-americans-trump-speech-2017-3
I'm a right-winger who doesn't derive political power off of "those others." Why do I feel perfectly at home with them? Here's the problem that white nationalists face: Most people simply don't feel the way they do. Racial identity is not key in my conception of myself or my place in society. The irony is that progressives face the same problem.
The hispanic world is not the US. Let's take Mexico for example, our economy, our political system, our people are wealthier, more functional, and more educated. We aren't in danger of become Mexico if people immigrate here and become Americans. They will continue to contribute to America in the way every immigrant culture has, food, music, customs, etc. become inter-mixed and make life better for everyone over time. You still can't give me a specific personal reason why you are, so confident that an all white country would be best. The countries that have tried it didn't find the results so pleasant.
white people conquer, rape, and enslave the Earth. then they demand the world respect their desire for racial and national purety? LOL!!!! i dont think so.
Because it's just a replacing one cultural Marxism with another. I don't care about race. It's an accident of my birth nothing more.
The fact that we're richer and "better educated" isn't what differentiates us. The fact that the people moving here are Mexicans is an important fact, regardless of how well-educated and wealthy those people become. The Americans are going to learn a difficult lesson about borderlands over the course of this century. Alsace-Lorraine, Tyrol, Donetsk, and the Pannonian Basin are potential glimpses of our future. Right-wingers are correct to be worried about the cross-border continuity between Mexico and the United States. The problem is that their "solutions" are catastrophes. The left would rather pretend that there is no problem. When I worry about geopolitical risks this is the one that tops my list. There is a kind of bitterness that I don't want to see born here. Sure. If their Mexican identity never becomes a significant differentiating marker. If they don't settle in a borderland wherein they become a nation with a foreign state. We won't become Mexico, but an insurgency isn't unlikely. A war, not impossible. My house is built on land taken in a war against my neighbor's ancestors. Nobody has forgotten that.