Apply background checks for gun purchases to voting

That would be entertaining.

 

And easily done

 

That gun goes to a FFL where you then fill out a BC and then it's yours.

 

.

Not in Texas. You can find a private party seller on your computer and meet them.

 

You are simply wrong again

 

do you think having a license makes people better drivers? revoking a license stops them from driving ? as for buying guns online, that's blatant lie , any transfer requires an FFL's involvement.and finally, since most guns used in crime are stolen or traded on the criminal black market what are you trying to achieve? I've worked in a gun shop and let me clue you in..ATF is nothing more than a bunch of paper cops ,calling them when you suspect criminal activity is a joke.

 

It depends upon how "on your computer" is defined.

 

I open the laptop, go online, order the gun, and pick it up that day. Holy cow....what part of that is not factual?

 

You re factually incorrect. Look up Armslist....and learn something

 

Who are you ordering the gun from?

 

That falls under private seller. I'm talking about ordering a firearm some a gun cite.

 

Evidence?

 

The end result in the same. A gun is ordered off the computer and picked u the same day. Faster than Amazon!!!

 

A person. In fact every gun ever ordered anywhere is ordered from a person

 

Offering to meet a private seller to purchase a firearm isn't typically referred to as ordering a gun. What that term allows you to do is confuse antis into thinking one can call up Bob's Big Gun Shop and have it delivered to one's home without a background check.

Ask the average uneducated anti what ordering a gun off the internet is and its the second definition they'll use nearly every time, I'd warrant.

 

Also, with my customer history and my FFL data on file, I can order a gun from some place like PSA and never interact with a human until I go to the FFL to pick it up.

 

Prior to transferring ownership the party currently in possession of the firearm must ensure that a background check is completed. If the check fails, transfer of the weapon to that party is illegal.

Since we are not permitted to keep records on who has or has not undergone such checks the remainder of your questions are moot.

 

That's nice. Thanks for sharing. LOL

 

I'm not confused at all. It's so easy to understand even a bag of hammers could figure it out. LOL

 

Loans don't transfer ownership. Are those exempt? Be specific - are there any exemptions to any transfers of any duration that you would grant to the UBC?

Sellers don't have direct access to NICS. Should this access be granted to allow for easy transfers, or do you choose to ignore the opinion of the Department of Justice.

What happens if the parties transfer without using a UBC, as happens and would still happen with straw purchases, corrupt FFLs, illegal street sales and theft?

Actually, every background check has a Form 4473 tied to it in the possession of the FFL who processed the background check. You may think those questions are moot, but every state that has imposed a UBC addresses those questions in the text of their law, with different answers depending upon the state. Presuming you got to write the law for the US, how would you address those questions?

 

When I type a paragraph in response it is a paragraph to which you respond. In line quotes are the liar's way of taking quotes out of context.

If you'd like to pick nits perhaps you could do so with your finger on your trigger using the barrel as the tool.

 

What you're talking about is a backdoor registration and it won't happen in many states.

 

Not unless we make it happen on a federal level

 

I haven't deleted a single thing you've written, and in line quotes allow to poster to address each point of the quoted post. If your posts aren't capable of standing as written, perhaps that is something you should work on improving.

No, typing suffices. Picking nits, as you call it, is how laws are examined and enforced.

 

That's because banners either don't live in reality, or their real objective has nothing to do with crime and public safety.