Myanmar ethnic cleansing half a million Muslim.. why is everybody quiet ??

So if you lived 200 years ago, you would have responded to Native Americans raping your wife and daughter by saying “we brought this on ourselves, we should just move”?

You seem to love blaming women and children for being raped.

 

It's more complicated than that. Apples and oranges.

 

No it’s not. You are talking about women and children who haven’t attacked anyone “reaping what they sowed” when they get raped. You are justifying attacking innocents for the crimes of others.

Really, you and Osama Bin Laden, pretty much morally equal right now.

 

Islam is not compatible with civilized cultures.

Would you want a neighborhood full of Aztecs practicing their barbaric human sacrifice religion next to you?

 

Displacement and genocide are not the same thing.

 

What do I call taking a land by force. I call it the USA.

Most land in europe was also taken by force by someone other than native population at sometime in history. I call this the history of humanity.

 

The faux liberals would, just as long as these people were not their neighbors. As long as they were your neighbors, it is all good with faux liberals.

 

Certainly, however please read the terms of the Balfour agreement, The League of Nations and the Mandate for Palestine, then you will understand. But thank you for acknowledging the land was stolen by immigrant land thieves.

 

The problem is that muslims are producing murders everywhere they settle. Their is something sick about Islam, and even if you don't have something personnal against people having leprosy, you don't want to catch their sickness, especially when they don't want to be cured.

 

The problem is that Humans are producing murders everywhere they settle.

Fixed it for you and made it more accurate.

 

Murderer. Not at the same rate, not in the same way.

 

Yet everywhere humans settle, regardless of the type of human, they seem to produce murderers.

 

Your contention about Buddhism is off-base. Violent Buddhists are breaking Buddha's law, while violent Muslims are obeying Mohammed's law. "Buddhism, as with Jainism, is founded on the principle of ahimsa or harmlessness and non-violence. The Buddha never condoned violence, going so far as to lay down rules expelling monks and nuns who even spoke in favour of killing." And are you seriously suggesting that the attacks by Rohingya Muslims were staged, a la the Reichstag fire? Because not even the Rohingya Muslims claim that. And yes, I have normal emotions... you want some examples of things that piss me off?

 

No, that is the Jews' privilege!

 

When attack is imminent, I call it self defense.

 

Would they be safe in Israel?

 

It doesn't matter if the attacks were staged or not. What matters is that the government found their excuse. Are you implying that the holocaust would have been justified if the Reichstag fire was a genuine attack?

Because that's exactly what you're doing. You're exactly morally on par with finding genocide an appropriate punishment. You think it's okay to wipe out an ethnoreligious group if some of them do bad things.

The material causes of terrorism are all rooted in imperialist foreign policy anyway

 

They're all Semites; there should be some similarities. It is possible they are not as problematic because they don't reproduce as rapidly, and don't worship Mohammed and everything he ever said or did.

 

Is there ever not a humanitarian crisis in Myanmar/Burma?

 

I'm sure you are interested hearing about the Pentagon's new war in Burma:

It seems that all of a sudden, the US has been struck by a new vision: Burma as the new theater of operation. In this case, all the jihadists plus several countries in the region would be mobilized to go to fight in South East Asia.
For a month now, the international press has been denouncing the plight of the Rohingyas and have been presenting Burma as some sort of hell, using just as many lies as it did to savage Syria.

It is the United States and the United Kingdom that arms the Burmese jihadists.
They were trained in boot camps in Saudi Arabia and Bangladesh. An assessment was made last August that these jihadists numbered at least 5,000 men.
etc.

Read more about this here:
http://www.voltairenet.org/article198176.html
------

 

LOL. First, the Muslims commit acts of terror because that's what Mohammed told them to do. "Strike off the heads of the unbelievers," he said. Imperialist foreign policy has nothing to do with it. Spain has committed no atrocities in the middle east, and generally stays out of it, and yet multiple terror attacks have occurred there.

Second, the Reichstag fire was a staged attack used to justify pograms against the Jews. The attacks by the Rohingya Muslims were actual attacks, justifying retaliation. We invaded two countries and brought down two governments over an attack by 19 people. Approximately 1,000 Rohingya Muslims attacked police stations and an army base. And 500,000 Muslims made it to Bangladesh. I don't recall 500,000 Jews being allowed to leave Germany, so if the Myanmar government is bent on genocide, they aren't doing a very good job. "Ethnic cleansing" would be a more accurate term, but since another approximately 600,000 Rohingya Muslims are still in Rakhine state (1.1 million lived there prior to the attacks), I'd say they aren't doing a very good job of that, either.

 

I read recently that Burma has never known peace following the British and Japanese colonization. Some 135 ethnic groups share the country.

 

I am aware of the present resentment against the Muslims, but do you think the Christians and the Jews are any better? They are actually worse!

 

Sorry, I don't answer (not accountable) for the Jews.

 

To admit to the history of humanity deserves no thanks. But it does deserve a recognition of the history of humanity. Therefore you point, is rather pointless. You have an unrealistic ideal, which never has been reality. For me, I try to only deal with us with consideration of the history of humanity. I see you singling out the jews as if what is involved here is not normal, when the history of humanity is viewed. If I took your position, to remain consistent and not indulge in hypocrisy, I would also have to demand for the return of Turtle Island to the Amerindians. And yet to do that would be rather silly, and disconnected from reality. And I have to spend too much time and energy to remain connected to the reality in which we live.