Mind boggling at Trump supporters

I'm sorry that you can't handle disagreement with your religious belief in the stories you are being told. Enjoy your fantasy-life.

 

So you're stating that like the GOP, the DEMS will back an exposed sex creep to keep the seat? Once again, you treat your supposition and conjecture as fact. What's your answer to the OP question?

 

You're blowing smoke and trying to divert the discussion is not answering the question. It's not about liking, but more about not getting a straight, substantive answer from you. HOW DO YOU JUSTIFY VOTING FOR TRUMP TO THE WOMEN IN YOUR LIFE? And do your own homework about Starr, as it was YOU and your like minded compadres who opened that door. You should know your subject matter before your fingers hit the keys....less embarrassing for you.

 

I like Honest Don more than Crooked Hillary.

 

I've addressed the question in the OP in two previous posts. Here, you're whining about something that makes me thing you might be drinking tonight, since you sincerely don't understand what I was saying before.

I think it makes you seem dumb, but when I say that the GOP decisively lost on the character issue, and then you go on to say that Clinton won because nobody cared about his philandering and your all caps "REAGANOMICS WAS KILLING THIS COUNTRY," well that makes my point exactly.

Now I recommend before you make another post that is simply going to embarrass yourself, you try to figure out why I said your comments show that you agree with me.

 

Yes there was an outcry about his philandering.

 

Three million out of a hundred million cast is not "overwhelming".

 

Son?

Son?

 

He did not marry her as a teenager and as far as we know did not ever touch her as a teenager

 

Can you explain why so many supporters such as you in your messages of the Democratic Party can justify having no interest in actual domestic and foreign policy issues in elections?

 

How did he harm my mother or my sister?

 

Where did I say that?

 

"Honest Don"??
You cannot be referring to the man with the most pants on fire statements ever collated on any politician!
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/false/

 

The point is, there is no proof. If I recall, there was an interview with the person in charge of mall security at the time, and he said he had no memory of such an action.

People need to do themselves a favor and take the time to look into the law regarding such actions. What would it take to ban someone from entering what is ostensibly a public venue. A court order?

 

Donald Trump was putting women into CEO positions in an industry where it was unheard of before most of the feminists here were born.

 

I'm well aware of the labor movement and why it was started. You may not want to hang your hat on such a claim, if you did your homework.

https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/1997/summer/american-labor-movement.html

The formation of American trade unions increased during the early Reconstruction period. Black and white workers shared a heightened interest in trade union organization, but because trade unions organized by white workers generally excluded blacks, black workers began to organize on their own​

I'm also well aware that it was Unions who brought about increasing collapse of the steel industry and other manufacturing in the United States, and were responsible for opening the door to imports from other countries. All as a result of their actions against US Steel in 1959.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steel_strike_of_1959

In the long run, the strike devastated the American steel industry. More than 85 percent of U.S. steel production had been shut down for almost four months. Hungry for steel, American industries began importing steel from foreign sources. Steel imports had been negligible prior to 1959. But during the strike, basic U.S. industries found Japanese and Korean steel to be less costly than American steel even after accounting for importation costs. The sudden shift toward imported steel set in motion a series of events, which led to the gradual decline of the American steel industry​

 

I owned a machine shop or Job Shop as some call them, from 1967-71. And the fact is, i was reading a lot about our decline in steel at the time. One of my accounts was a local steel mill that later collapsed into bankruptcy and i knew when doing business with them they were struggling. The Mill started operating in the 1920's I believe. The machinery inside the mill was ancient. i got work because it was cheaper for me to make things for the mill than for their own in-house shop to make them. i had new machines vs their ancient machines that were not as accurate as mine were.

I read trade magazines sent to machine shops and the like and of course Fortune magazine and Money Magazine. i was in on the first subscriptions to Money.
i recall what a huge deal it was going to be in trade with China. i purchased an audio course on dealing with them.

We had destroyed much of Japan's steel production and China was in terrible shape. Europe too was hurt seriously by all the bombing. As we used the Marshall plan to rebuild others, our own factories were in decline.

 

The US Steel strike opened the door to imports, which regardless of industry, were considered inferior. After learning the steel from Japan was acceptable, other imports began to flow into the United States. I'm old enough to remember when "Made in Japan" was an indicator of cheap low quality goods.

Adding insult to injury, US Environmental policy, while needed, did not allow enough room to generate the profits needed to retrofit the big steel plants, and foreign imports were dumped into the US market at below cost. Putting the death nail to the heart of the Steel industry were Union Strikes at the time.

 

Politifact is run by a bunch of communists.

 

Just what policies of barry's do you think caused the sudden turn around?

 

Central planning is "trickle down economics".

 

Her reasoning is quite simple. We make a lot of money. One party says we should pay more taxes for services we don't use, and one party says we shouldn't. She doesn't care about the slander, because she's had some people in her life that were great leaders with terrible personal lives. It all comes down to taxes with her.

Your reference to reagonomics is laughable on several levels.

 

Which would not be a problem if they were reliable in spite of their obvious bias, but they are not reliable.
Politifact is not a credible source.

 

Wow, it must really be difficult to keep up. It has already been posted here some place that the report of Moore being banned from a mall was not true. In fact, I saw a video on TV of the mall manager saying that they had reports of Moore doing some skirt chasing, but they never banned him from the mall. I saw it on Fox, so that probably explains why you didn't see it.

Also, 40 years ago the age of consent and marriage for females in Alabama was 14. Today, it is 16. Moore may have had an age difference, but there was nothing illegal going on by the standards of the day. Judgement is being passed based on current standards and political convienence, which is a big mistake. There, I just defended a Democrat. You're welcome.

 

I neither agree or disagree with people. I agree or disagree with ideas.