Those are problems for the anti-abortion activists and churches. There should be enough religious families to each adopt one baby and solve the adoption problem.
Uh, that's what I said: ""All of which has nothing to do with women retaining the rights everyone else has."" BTW, saying it COULD BE VOLUNTARY implies a possible infringement on rights. Cloning is irrelevant, it has nothing to do with abortion or gestation or women's rights to their own bodies. HOW does a doctor make a woman wait until the fourth week to have an abortion? When? Where? Most women don't even know they're pregnant until then...so WTF are you talking about....and the morning after pill can be taken , GET THIS, the MORNING AFTER, they do not wait 4 weeks to take the MORNING AFTER pill. I said IF THEY CHOOSE... CHOOSE as in CHOICE .....they may CHOOSE NOT to take it....( Why don't Anti-Choicers EVER look up the definition of CHOICE ?) NO one is obligated to put drugs into their bodies Uh, duh, ya, women have to wait to have an abortion UNTIL THEY KNOW THEY'RE PREGNANT...brilliant observation.... I'm glad you understand how hypocritical Anti-Choicers are. They ONLY want to use the fetus to control women, they care nothing for the actual children. As I have said, Repubs and Anti-Choicers FIGHT to cut funding to any entity that supports or aids children. They want funding cut to Welfare, WIC, SNAP, healthy school lunches, they don't even want poor kids to have access to educational TV (YES, they cut funding to PBS which has been shown to aid children in learning and better prepare them for school...and ANTI's CUT FUNDING), and many unwanted children who are given up for adoption end up aging out of the system because Anti's did NOT adopt them.....
What they say versus what they do are two entirely different things. They support warmongering, the death penalty and depriving children of food and healthcare but they are not lining up to adopt the 400,000+ unwanted children who are wards of the state.
So then all humans are savages since Eve and Adam and Cain and Abel.... Anyone who promotes/supports war is also a savage.... .....
I see....so you are promoting the removal of rights and freedoms from strangers based on...Your Opinion?
Which are YOUR OPINIONS! You must be terribly egocentric to think your "Beliefs" are so important that everyone else must adhere to them as well regardless of what they think or want to do with their own bodies. And before you drop your next ego bomb.....most humans do not consider a human to be a person until birth.
Most humans didn't consider slaves to be fully humans either. Most humans have been wrong before. They're wrong about the unborn as well. Be honest. Most people who deny the humanity of the unborn believe this because they hate the idea of restricting abortions because they absolutely hate the idea of womens sexual freedoms being restricted.
When it comes to the voting booth, my opinions have as much weight as a 100 facts anyone else brings to the same voting booth.
The election of IQ45 being a perfect example. A living, breathing demonstration of the Dunning–Kruger effect, folks...
Assuming you are mocking President Trump (whom I did not vote for) I'm quite certain his IQ is well beyond (probably at least twice as high as) "45"
So you LIKE the idea of women's sexual freedom being restricted? WHY? I see it from the opposite view, Anti-Choicers deny the humanity of women and fight to restrict abortions so they can restrict women because they STILL think of them as slaves..../.they haven't entered the 20th century yet... BTW, I never denied the humanity of human fetuses and haven't known anyone who did... AND BTW, NO "most" people did NOT consider slaves as less than human, only slave owners and sellers. How am I "wrong" about fetuses?
As is typical the "Slave" card has come into play, though you started it quickly probably because the "Person" play was eliminated. I WILL be completely honest (as usual) and very clearly state I really do not care one way or another about abortion, I care about human rights.
