Roy Moore won't go away.

Months after the good people of Alabama had ignored p-grabber Trump and thought that they had rid themselves of their lying lecher, he's passing that sh¡tkicker hat he had thrown into the ring.

Radical teenage predator Roy Moore is now begging his goofballs to pay for the frivolous lawsuit he filed.

"One of our attorneys is a Jew!"​

 

Roy Moore won't go away.

​

 

I am dying to know how many Trumpsters nationally sent this man a check and will send this Christian warrior money so that he can help make America great again by paying off his lawyers.

If we ever get a list, we need to do some scientific research on their how their brain malfunctions.

 

What would you expect ?

They just aired "Wanda Nevada" on cable just recently.

 

If the lecher can make money off his jihad against the rise of his "anti-Christian kingdom!" let's hope it takes the form of his endorsing and campaigning for GOP candidates across America in the forthcoming election.

Obviously, with women - especially the well-educated - highly motivated to vote, let's hope ol' Roy's message is being heard.

Roy Moore endorses GOP Senate candidate in Missouri who called feminists ‘she-devils’!
​

 

"One of our attorneys is a Jew!"
​

 

Moore is the king of the peckerwoods

 

Why should Roy go anywhere? Pretty obvious all the feigned outrage disappeared on election day. Has Alabama raised the age of legal consent? Where are the protesters? You have zero interest in Moore, or the alleged victim either. Ditto here. This thread, the whole topic, is just a vehicle ... So transparent.

 

But it sure is reliable transportation. He's an amoral attention-seeking prick, one that the other amoral chief republican prick endorsed, and that makes him is your amoral attention-seeking prick.

 

The voters of Alabama have spoken.

Your presumptuousness is declaring that, "You have zero interest in Moore" is noted, your post transparent.

To the contrary, I am glad that Moore won't go away. He has his following, and I hope he persists in endorsing candidates of his ilk around the country. Such "vehicles" are an important source for Americans in making the decisions they express at the polls.

If anyone wants to fund Moore's antics, that is their right. My publicizing his appeal may even reach some of those folks.

 

Let me emphasize that I couldn't care less about Roy, or his morality. Moore was endorsed before the allegations surfaced, and disavowed for the most part afterwards. I won't waste my breath on the "presumption of innonce" objections ... but please don't pretend this thread was anything but a vehicle for you either. Prick ... twice in 1 paragraph? 2 GOP smears for the price of 1 too.

 

You know what, out of the "goodness" in my heart, I'm going to help disgraced former Senate candidate and well-known predator of teen girls Roy Moore with his financial woes:

 

I am not interested in 'most'. I am interested in the President of the United States , who doubled down on his endorsement after the allegations, once he knew his Senate chances were slimming. Or half the senate and Speaker Ryan who backed off their moral condemnation fast enough on his signal.

If I were you, I wouldn't waste my breath on 'presumption of innocence' either. Its lousy reasoning, and your post history is not a very good foundation on which to rest that line on.

 

Roy Moore shows that we need a national age of consent law as well as banning underage marriage. We could call it the "No More Moores Law".

 

Actually we need a national 'age of consent to contract' law that applies. Its screwy to expect contracts to be enforced including marriage contracts, beyond state boundaries with some states having 16, and others having 18.

 

Yes, another poster admires your "guilt by association" tack. Never mind that Moore hasn't had his day in court yet. I'm sure my sense of fair play seems "deplorable" too.

 

That is why he isn't in jail. I am all in favor of a 'beyond a reasonable' standard proven in a court before we shut the cell door.

 

What is another pattern with Moore, besides his teenage girl habit, is his sanctimonious scare tactic as a vehicle for his begging.

He has been fleecing these vulnerable marks for quite some time:

 

Regardless of the label, that would be the best outcome, and should have been the CONTINUING focus. Moore is irrelevant to issue of consent laws, in the here and now. Changing the statute shouldn't be contingent on Roys guilt or innocence. Kinda my point.

 

We can have more than one 'focus'. He is exhibit A as to why we need to change those laws so he is not irrelevant. His fleecing of the Christians sheeple is another focus. And pointing out the depraved hypocritical amorality of members of the GOP who endorsed him knowing about these accusations is still another focus. See, that isn't hard at all.

 

See, there are real issues that extend well beyond Roy. I pointed out that all interest evaporated post election. Moore might be guilty. Proving that doesn't address the underlying issues, and there are many. Puting Roy in the mix only complicates the issues. Remove the "presumption" aspect and focus on victim advocacy. Roy isn't a vehicle that gets you there. Roys car only goes as far as finger pointing.

 

A lot of the social conservative politicians are nothing more than politically-oriented TV evangelists. They prey on the gullible and stoke the fires of false righteousness and hateful self-aggrandizement through the sanctimonious judgement of those who they proclaim to be morally inferior. Their entire political plank extends from the "plank in their eye", so to speak.

 

Really? Pedophilia, under age marriage marriage are Roy Moore creations? Moore provided the only opportunity for discussion? I'm not going there with you. Roys a filthy pediphile and so's anyone who says he deserves a day in court. Now see what kind of support you garnish from the right.

 

Moore has made himself a public figure, and, obviously, he wants his begging publicized. That is the very nature of such public appeals.

As a well-known politician, who endorsed him and whom he endorses are public declarations that are also intended to be brought to public attention.

Publicly discussing matters that are publicly promoted hardly contradicts the purposes of those who promote them.

 

All 'interest' has not. The Republican Congressional interest sure has. That is why there is no bill getting committee hearings to solve the national question when both bodies are in republican hands. We already know they don't give a ****. . Proving that Moore is guilty only provides some justice and is its own reward. Discussing his case in the public square, is illustrative of why we need the bill. It complicates nothing. The embarrassment of the GOP on this issue is not incidental. It offers the public a reminder that the amoral hypocritical majority party needs to be removed from power as its punishment.

They are not complications, sir. They are each valid applications of this set of facts, you want forgotten.