Extreme views examined

Of course not, they just got whipped, beaten, tortured and hung instead.

My "homeboys" are saints compared to your folks' history. Honestly, do you read half the sht you write?

 

a peaceful agreement between ethnic groups to separate is more properly called a "fantasy"

 

Wow, I hope you stretched before reaching for that one.

 

Same as in Africa. What race ran the slave trade in Africa, again?

No, we can clearly see the behavior of your homeboys, in Africa and even in major US cities, and conclude that they aren’t really saints at all.

 

It's extreme to say the Democrats are the party of the blacks.

 

Hogwash.

One of the dumbest assumptions of the left is that the health of a society is controlled by the numerical makeup of it's members. We have forced busing, regulated employment and every damn thing trying to prove that, and done more harm than good. What we refuse to address is character and values, and that there are good and bad people of all kinds. Good people make healthy communities, and the mix of races doesn't have a damn thing to do with that. Any race could be a majority in a community or a nation, and the quality of the people would still determine the character of it. To assume otherwise is to say that this race or that race lacks the ability to be good and responsible.

 

Not really, it’s been done in the not so distant past. After WWI new countries were drawn based on ethnic composition of the population. Imagine that, they determined that the best way to establish peace was to give ethnic groups their own area.

Your people don’t believe in the concept of sovereign borders, except for maybe one, so you’re not really able to envision such a thing happening.

 

You can’t have the kind of country that you grew up in with a non-white majority. Yes, there are good and bad in every group, but if you wish for the US to remain a Western nation, you need Western people to control it, with their culture, heritage, language, history, and values.

Demographics matter.

 

It's extreme to support policies that redistribute ever more of the nation's income, wealth and resources to the few at the top of the income ladder and away from the masses at the bottom.

It's extreme to call Blacks who talk about slavery as "extremist" and to falsely claim no black has suffered one bit from slavery.

 

you understand that those borders are one of the reasons why the third world has so much conflict today yes

 

Appears to be the case

 

I'm just going to say that life for blacks in the USA prior to 1865 was generally extremely hard and bad, got a little better for a few years, then got bad again. I wasn't there in the 19th century and only know what I've read. It was really bad.

And I imagine it is really bad for whites in SA now.

It seems to be hardwired into the DNA of mankind to enslave, dominate, conquer, kill, torture, do crime, and do genocide -- that's the summary of human history.

 

Explain.

 

To help me and you, how long were you a slave and do you believe you were well treated, fed well and clothed well?

 

But the only ones ever given grief over this are white people. You won’t see the micfranklins of the world ever confront Arabs about enslaving their ancestors, even when they were the biggest offenders with African slavery. That’s because micfranklin specifically has a problem with whites, not fellow “people of color”.

 

The same race that white folks definitely think owes them a thank you card for doing your job.

They're saint enough to keep the swastika tats off their arms and the burning crosses away. Unlike your people.

 

What’s our job?

Yeah, they just join gangs and destroy neighborhoods. Much better.

 

Never. I can, however, guarantee you my ancestors were not fans of being shackled to a boat, whipped and beaten frequently and then told they have no real rights despite the end of the Civil War.

 

They should have taken the Liberia offer as reparations. You could have been a kang over there instead of whining about whites on the internet here. Make Wakanda real!

 

I'm guessing some of them might have been in support of Asians though. There just weren't many Chinese/Japanese around during that period so early in U.S. history.
Later in the 1870s (not so long after the Civil War) the U.S. political climate started becoming more hostile to immigration from Asia, but this may have been because there was a lengthy period of financial recession that followed the Civil War, and employment conditions were not that good. This was around the same time when a lot of destitute people from the East coast journeyed to California hoping to find gold. At first no one minded the Chinese, but as California's population began increasing and the gold began becoming more scarce, attitudes changed.
Chinese immigration did continue after 1900 but it was restricted, about half the number it had been in 1880 just before the Chinese Exclusion Act was passed.

 

At the time, ending slavery. Congrats on doing what amounts to basic human decency. Several years after other countries in the western hemisphere already ended it.

They decided it was better to leave the shooting of malls, schools, concerts and workplaces to your folks.

 

But if they did that then how else would I get a crash course education on what white trash is like?

 

Not all whites, just the racist ones like you and the other ones on the forum.

 

Why wasn’t that your job? If Africans weren’t selling slaves whites wouldn’t have been buying them.

You don’t wanna get into a discussion on who commits the crime in this country.

 

ONLY from the standpoint that demographics tend to follow the nature of people in a given area. If you consider the makeup in a crime ridden area, it would be obvious that the people there have a low level of character. If that area is also primarily black and you think that is all that matters and we should force it to blend into another community.... You blend the races. AND YOU BLEND THE CHARACTER, THE STANDARDS OF LIVING, AND CULTURAL VALUES. There are good people everywhere- but the communities they build for themselves do represent their character, and in many ways what they want out of life.It reflects their values and the values of the culture they support.

The idea that it is wrong to build a high standard of living is a truly stupid one. The idea that you can mix widely different cultural values and improve the result by dilution of races or cultures is equally stupid.

You allow people to become what they want to be- that is also known as freedom. People will tend to live with others of similar values, cultures and colors- and that is also freedom. You don't impose your definition of culture or a standard of living on them, because that is as wrong as denying them the right to make their own choices. You do not and cannot impose a change on either side, without doing harm, and if you do- you are assuming that you have the right to dictate to others and alter their lives so you will feel better for it.

I've worked in Central America and South America, as well as operating a business in a black community, had black employees and black customers, spanish employees and customers. There are good people everywhere- and there are bad. The ratio of that within a culture is what they make it; it simply doesn't exist because of race.