Using the Democrat high school rule, Booker must resign

Lol stormy is the highest paid whore since cleopatra....

 

Nope, this has all been explained, so, no, "you don't get once more. This is over.'

 

How about this? Next time you write more than three sentences (a full paragraph would be nice, but I'll settle for what I can get) send me a link to the thread you're in and I'll play there for a bit.

Looking forward to it, Jake...

 

There are few if any socialist Donks that I'm aware of, but Booker - and Ellison - are complete slime.

Booker's 927 performance was monumentally creepy, surpassed only by Harris in pure amoral depravity.

 

If only there was a petition... to allow folks to sign that could be used to leverage mr Booker to resign from office given his own admission of his own sexual assault of a minor girl.

 

You REALLY need to get over the idea that leftists/socialists are synonymous with liberals/progressives.

It's like confusing a cat for a dog.

VERY different animals.

 

There are VERY few leftists (or socialists) here, but many liberals and Democrats.

HUGE difference.

 

No, not "just once more."

Let me know when you are in charge.

 

Welcome to the discussion!

Actually, I started to use the three words together after the extreme left wing of the party seized control.

One of the 2016 Democratic Party candidates for president is a self-avowed socialist. The Democratic Socialists of America have made inroads into the party; look how Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has been celebrated by Democrats.

What with their obsession with identity politics, their abandonment of lower and middle class workers and the elevation of leftists such as Keith Ellison and Tom Perez to the party's national committee, as well as attacks on the First Amendment as we're seeing on college campuses and elsewhere, Democrats are really no longer best described as simply liberals or progressives in my opinion.

Tell me how I'm wrong...

 

Not "just once more." The hard left does not control the Dems.

That's a right wing talking point, nothing more.

 

Cory will resign right after the Groper-in-Chief does.

 

Serious question, Lee.

Booker, much like is being alleged about Kavanaugh, sexually assaulted a teenage girl while in high school.

Why are his actions being dismissed by Democrats? Besides the obvious partisan zeal...

 

Then why won’t you agree with his removal for sexual misconduct? I agreed that Booker and the Clintons sfhould go.

 

Because my OP addresses what two individuals did, and alleged to have done, in high school.

If you want to start yet another thread about Trump and why leftists hate him, feel free. Or if you want to add a similar instance where a public figure sexually assaulted a teenage girl while in high school, feel free.

 

Because it wasn't sexual assault.

 

We get it. Trump is on your team, so you won’t go there.

You had no problem talking about Clinton even though he was not listed in your OP.

 

Don't give Medieval Man "just once more." The Clinton deflection is typical.

 

You don't see the difference between a senator (who can be voted out) and a supreme court justice (who gets a lifetime appointment)?

 

and the people will decide that when they vote

just as republicans in congress must decide that now when they vote

just like republicans decided that when they voted for Trump and Roy Moore

 

Sure it was. He squeezed a teen girl's breast, she pushed his hand away, and he squeezed it again.

Hey, these are your rules, just looking for some consistency from Democrats...

 

You don't see a difference between a teen boy who gropes a teen girl and another boy who gropes a teen girl?

 

Not a Trump guy. But just as leftists will yell RRAAACCIISST! and RUSSIIIAA! they also yell TTRRRUUUMMPP! in order to deflect from the argument at hand.

Tell me Daniel, what was the difference between Booker's actions and Kavanaugh's? Why are liberals/progressives/socialists dismissing one yet irate about the other?

 

Nope. He tried once, was brushed aside, then tried and she allowed. Not sexual assault in any courtroom in the United States. Sorry, but that is a big fail.

 

Kinda like the incident with Kavanaugh, even if he did it, wouldn't be considered for prosecution in any courtroom in the United States?

And according to Booker, she was drunk and he found his 'mark' when he grabbed her breast after she rebuffed him. She didn't allow anything.

It seems, according to your rules, that a boob-grap is worthy of an FBI investigation. Why aren't you demanding one to look into Booker's sexual assault?

Don't you care about women?

 

I do when one of them is being confirmed as a supreme court justice. Both are wrong. And if the girl in Booker's case came out and laid allegations (versus him writing about it) I would be all for going after him. But again - he can be elected out...BK can't.