Calling all infidels.

It's my guess a lot of women would love to get out of there.
The internet is opening up a world they didn't know existed.

 

What is an infidel?

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/infidel

"
Religion .

1. a person who does not accept a particular faith, especially Christianity.
2. (in Christian use) an unbeliever, especially a Muslim.
3. (in Muslim use) a person who does not accept the Islamic faith; kafir(def 2).

a person who has no religious faith; unbeliever.
"

 

Well, I could have used many words..eg..
kafir
dhimmi
harbi
murtad
mushrik
kitaabi
dahriyyah
mulhid
zindeeq
hanif
kufr
kufr jahl
kufr juhood
kufr shakk
kufr ta'weel
Imams have said that all non muslims are infidels

 

Ooooo

That's a bunch of them, more than I was aware of.

Proud to be a Kafir.

 

yep, to Christians Muslims are Infidels
to Muslims Christians are Infidels

 

And your point is......

 

my point was to each religion the other religions believers are Infidels

what is your point?

 

https://www.news.com.au/national/vi...allah/news-story/59aa5dc3c1525f68360734357947
He did it in the name of allah.....

 

Imams have said that all non muslims are infidels..I have already said I could have used other words.
Arent you getting a little pedantic.

 

When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for religious privileges, other components tend to creep in. This is how it works. As long as the Muslim population remains around 2% in any given country, they will for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, & not as a threat. This is the case in:
United States — Muslim 0.6%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1.8%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities & disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails & among street gangs. This is happening in:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:
France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris , we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:
Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 15%

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:
Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:
Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:
Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrasses are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:
Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 100%

Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts nor schools nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.

 

While the term infidel can probably be mentioned in all religions.
Islam is the only one who kills infidels in the modern world.

 

not true, the Jewish and Christians have killed their share of Infidels too - don't forget history.... we do not want to repeat it

 

The careful observer will note the words...…."In the modern world."

We know the Jews did it thousands of years ago.

 

right now Muslims are king of the hill, but one could say Bush's response trumped that in the name of his Christian God

"Donald Rumsfeld's holy war: How President Bush's Iraq briefings came with quotes from the Bible"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...t-Bushs-Iraq-briefings-came-quotes-Bible.html

"Bush's use of word 'crusade' a red flag"

https://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Bush-s-use-of-word-crusade-a-red-flag-1066045.php

 

One could say that, but hardly true.
He was just gathering support.
All wars gather people from religious backgrounds for masses of them.

 

actually it's very true sadly, Bush should of kept his religion out of it

"U.S. Military Weapons Inscribed With Secret 'Jesus' Bible Codes"

https://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/us-m...bed-secret-jesus-bible-codes/story?id=9575794

 

That was happening, religion or not.
Bush hardly represents any religion.

 

I disagree, it woudl of just been a quick retaliatory attack, not the over-reaction we got - Bush thought he was on a mission from his God... a Crusade

thus our two 10+ year wars

 

Then we agree to disagree.

 

"Bush hardly represents any religion."

and I am sure many Muslims woudl say ISIS doesn't represent their religion too - but they are Muslims - just a fact

 

Most Muslims say they don't.

 

we will never know as we had a President that brought the Christian religion into it and a Muslim Terrorsit group that brought Muslims religion into it

 

Hardly a comparison.

Abū Bakr al-Baghdadi is an Islamic scholar, and preaches the religion in his quests.
Everything he says is religious orientated, and he has the books to back it up.

Bush is not a Religious scholar, and just mentioned it in a speech.

 

trying to say all of a Religion is bad because of the actions of a tiny percent of them is a reach, though I understand why religious fanatics from both Christians and Muslims do this - they want their religion to replace the other - the truth is, neither is gonna get the other to believe differently via force

 

Bush is not a religious fanatic, Hell, he's probably an atheist.