Elementary Schools In Canada Mandated To Fly Gay Pride Flags. The One Dissenting Voice Got Shut Down

You know instead of attaching your idiotic premise to gay people how about you focus your attention on millennial's that are deciding that having children is not important. That is the real issue, but of course you have to blame it all on gays.

 

homosexuals have no effect on heterosexuals procreating. Your argument is invalid.

 

I've given this leftist trend some Occasional-Cortex style thought recently and have decided that the leftist fascination with RAMMING gay this and that lifestyles down national throats -- in the U.S. and U.K. -- is one solution for anyone worried about world overpopulation. If you mentally condition children as early as possible then when they grow up enough to become horny kids naturally they will start going for their same sex peers, which in turn will then decrease population pressures.

All it will have cost is the manufacturing of a bunch of rainbow colored flags. It's that last bit, of course, that would bother leftists because they seem to believe that unless one throws billions or trillions of dollars at a problem then the solution cannot possibly BE a solution.

 

Which is more important to our society and species?

 

homosexuals have no effect on heterosexuals procreating. Your argument is invalid.

 

What did I blame gays for? I asked a simple question since there is a celebration of homosexuality what about one for heterosexuality, which is more important to our society and species?

 

Not what I said I asked

Which is more important to our society and species? If you won't answer oh well, you prove the point.

 

what you are asking is trying to support the argument that homosexuals somehow have an impact on heterosexual procreation.

This is why your argument is invalid. And yes, my point is proven. Homosexuality has no effect on heterosexual procreation, or heterosexuals in any way.

 

It's a SCHOOL. Full of CHILDREN.

CHILDREN do not need to be exposed to issues of adult sexuality.

 

Yet even gay people themselves know that 'getting them while young' does in fact, increase the numbers.

It's incredibly naive to think that this stuff doesn't influence children.

 

children are very gender aware at a very young age it has nothing to do with adult sexuality...displaying a gay pride flag de-stigmatizes and normalizes homosexuality, it tells the children who are gay it's okay, it's safe to come out and be who you are...what we see throughout this thread are old intolerant homophobic white males that it's not...

the school vote on the flag was democratic and probably extensively discussed beforehand but that fact is conveniently omitted...only one misinformed social moralist opposed

 

there's no truth to that...

 

let's call it what it is Bull ****...there is no jail time for incorrect pronoun use...more alternative facts from the rightwing Faux News bubble...

 

That's not a school's concern. If they start pandering to every special interest group/lifestyle/preference, they cease to become schools and start to become parents and propagandists. Even more importantly, many parents don't want their kids to think it's okay to be gay. Therefore no one side should be accommodated at the expense of the other. It's outrageous to do so, when the matter does not pertain directly to academic education.

Repeating: adult SEXUALITY (any reference to, or association to) has no place in schools. And these flags are about SEXUALITY, not gender.

 

There really really is. Again, it's deeply naive to think such things don't influence children.

 

Your ignorance is just pathetic.

Tell me, if you don't pay a fine imposed by the government what happens? Try to think before you answer this time.

But don't worry another uninformed Canadian on this site made a similar laughable mistake and couldn't admit it either.

 

And it begs the question, if there is no truth to it why would they push so hard for it?

 

there isn't any evidence to back that up...what you interpret as increasing numbers is just children coming into the open where they were to afraid to before...homosexuality has always with us but persecution/ostracized/shaming has kept it out of sight, children afraid to tell their own parents of their feelings... millions of men and women have had heterosexual marriages even though they were gay out of fear for their own safety...

 

Sigh ... nope. I realise that that hackneyed old trope is still the 'go to' for things like homosexuality and autism for a certain sector of 20thC thinkers, but really?

 

when you make up **** you have your own "alternative facts" Bill C-16 does not send anyone to jail for pro noun use...that's just ludicous

 

but you have nothing but your own personal prejudices and made up facts sooo....

 

lol So you chose not to huh.

God its too easy to trip up emotional liberals with reality.

What should I do if I can’t pay a court fine on time? If you get a fine in court, the judge will give you a deadline for paying. This is called the due date. You have three choices. You can: pay by the due date. If you can pay some but not all of the fine by the due date, pay as much as you can and then choose one of the next two options. ask for an extension. This gives you more time to pay. ask for jail time instead. This is called default jail time. If you're serving jail time for another crime anyway, you might choose this option. If you choose to do nothing, you risk the consequences, which could include jail time

https://lss.bc.ca/resources/pdfs/pubs/If-You-Cant-Pay-Your-Court-Fine-on-Time-eng.pdf

But wait, there's more!


Fine
A fine can be ordered on its own or in addition to probation or imprisonment.[24] It cannot be ordered in combination of both probation and imprisonment.[25]

If the offence is a summary conviction offence (or a hybrid offence where the Crown elects to proceed summarily), the maximum fine is $5,000, unless otherwise stated in the statute.[26]

Before a court imposes a fine, it must inquire into the ability to pay the fine.[27]

Failure to pay the fine by the time required in the order can result in the person being found in default. A number of remedies exist, including imprisonment. In the past a court that imposed a fine would also impose a hypothetical sentence in the event of default. This led to gross inconsistencies so in 1995 Parliament created a fixed formula for determining the number of days of imprisonment. This formula is determined by taking the unpaid amount and any costs associated with incarcerating the accused as the numerator and eight times the provincial minimum wage as the denominator. For example, an unpaid fine of $640 in a jurisdiction with a minimum wage of $8 hourly would be approximately 10 days.

In addition, unless waived by the court, the defendant is required to pay a victim fine surcharge in addition to whatever else the judge imposes as sentence. The surcharge is 30% of the fine imposed or, if no fine is imposed, $100 for an indictable offence and $50 for an offence punishable on summary conviction. This amount may be increased or decreased depending on the discretion of the court.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_sentencing_in_Canada

This is for ANY fine not paid. Got it? Any fine.

Seriously dude, even the tiniest bit of critical thinking would have provided the answer or no one would ever pay a fine imposed by the state.

Now what wyly? What new and uninformed excuse are you going to throw out in the face of cold hard reality and facts?

 

You don't know what the hell you're talking about.

Well yeah, that's what constitutionalists do when judges rule unconstitutionally.

That's funny. I was a teenager when sitcoms started to become homosexual propaganda outlets, and I have yet to hear such an argument from anyone but defenders of perversion.

 

Stop trying to put words in my mouth.

I asked
Which is more important to our society and species? Homosexuality or heterosexuality, which should we celebrate and encourage the most?

 

So why not have a celebrate heterosexuality month and flag too to they get a balance view?