Christchurch shooter's views were celebrated online

Wow - you just THINK in assumptions. You don't even bother looking at ANYTHING if some idea hit you!

Most generous would imply most immigrants/population. I do NOT believe the US is #1 by that measure. We also refuse to accept refugees from the wars we fight, leaving that to other nations. How can one justify THAT kind of BS?

I've stated MANY times that I support the bipartisan immigration reform act of 2013 - an bill that passed the Senate and would have passed the House had Boehner not blocked it.

That bill included more than $40B for the southern wall! It also revised our visa program - which is how half come and stay illegally. It also included stiff control of jobs - the primary reason people come and stay.

So, your ridiculous assumptions CLEARLY failed you on that one!

And, we absolutely are NOT being invaded. Invasion is organized. Invasion implies an increase in the number who are here - which multiple sources say is not happening. What we're seeing is the result of horrendous dictatorships and drug cartels, causing more to be fleeing for their lives. That is swamping our pathetically supported immigration courts. From there, Trump is pumping absolute and total LIES proven to be so multiple times - concerning drug traffic, crime, etc.

How about actually LOOKING?


YOU, on the other hand, back Trump's immigration lies and his acceptance of white supremacy (using the same language as the NZ terrorist) - which reflects negatively on the USA around the entire world.

 

Do you enjoy arguing with your own vacuous strawmen because you seem to have a lot of them?

 

Good sir, when you make the claim everyone who wasn’t anti fascist at the Charlottesville protest was a bad person, and you are asked to back that claim, that is no strawman!

 

Invaded by LEGAL Hispanics?

Denies visas to who?

To keep out LEGAL Hispanics?

He says that ALL of them are violent criminals?

 

So you can make an allegation and not back it up.

Ok.

 

That is yet another vapid strawman because I never made that claim.

Why don't you try READING what I actually POSTED for a change?

Oh wait, then you wouldn't be able to post inane strawman bovine excrement!

 

Ok. You have nothing but ad hominem to back up your incorrect opinions as usual.

Again, I have proof of my claims.

Here are a couple good people who were at the Charlottesville protest.

https://www.dailysignal.com/2017/08/14/went-charlottesville-protests-heres-saw/

And from everyone’s favorite, the NYTimes

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/16/...&gwh=5EFC7C2072B7A9EFBF30691D07E11340&gwt=pay

 

Substantiating your own bovine excrement strawman with extremist rightwing disinformation sources now?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-signal/

As far as the NYT article goes it does NOT support your position either.

Too bad you have consistently FAILED to address what I actually posted!

Charging at imaginary windmills using DISCREDITED SOURCES is only harming your own diminishing credibility.

 

and Mixed for factual reporting due to not aligning with the consensus of science regarding climate change......snip~





Typical leftists.

 

Selective editing noted. Quote the entire article not just parts you like. You are a fraud again.

No source is discredited. Read the writings of the man and see he is a good person. Stop being a lemming it is to your detriment.

 

Puerile ad hom VIOLATIONS of PF Rules duly noted and ignored for DEROGATORY reasons.

 

Your opinion of the man's character is just that, YOUR OPINION and nothing more. Opinions are like @ssholes - everyone has one, and most stink to high heaven. Don't even think about trying to push your personal opinion as gospel. That ain't gonna fly...

 

Who coulda seen ^^ that ^^ coming?

557 links do illustrate that conservative preservationists / activists / voters / residents were also in attendence.

 

I did see a confused looking granny amongst the little nazis my parents generation would have killed.

 

I answered your question in full.

 

So you still have no basis for your opinions. Ok.

 

So you were there?

 

Bike Lock Bill they call me.

 

I would have to agree that anyone who is found rallying for white supremacy IS a bad person.

They are clearly lobbying against the fundamental principles upon which America is founded.

They are promoting action against minorities without any justification.

Nothing more than that needs to be said in order to identify these people as bad people.

 

You made an allegation that conservatives were trying to suppress the vote. I guess you’re talking about voter ID laws. Do you have solid evidence to show voter ID laws bar minorities from voting?

 

Well a mature Turkish Muslim just shot a bunch of people on a Tram in Utrecht.

 

Who are “they”?

 

You have a funny definition of maturity. But let's ignore millions because of one. Makes total sense.

 

Why is it so hard to understand that not everyone there to support historical monuments was a white supremisist?
Do you think all the counter protesters were bad people just because some of them were only there to brawl? I don’t. Why can’t we judge individuals by their actions?

 

That would be fifty plus...If you wish to argue that age and maturity don't of necessity go hand in hand, you'll get no argument from me. But the shooter was of an age that usually is considered mature and in a few places in the world old.