Adam Schiff rejects reports that Mueller indictments are over, says special counsel could be called

The bottom line is that we need to see what Mueller found. It's what we have so far on the question of Russia.

If you conclude that there is more to find from there, I'm ready to listen.

 

The bottom line is that the hoax is dead.

 

How long has Dirty Bob Mueller known there was no Trump-Russia collusion?
If Shiftless Schiff calls him, he needs to be asked that.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/and...ler-known-there-was-no-trump-russia-collusion

 

I agree the report should be released.

I also want to see members of the New Democratic Party held accountable for their actions. Even the way they are calling for it's release is outrageous.

People should be offended they are viewed by them as being naive and stupid.

 

Schiff has the evidence, he has been telling us all for two years he has it. So, since the Mueller investigation is complete and Schiff apparently has information that Mueller must have missed, lets see it. The time has come for him to show the world his "circumstantial and direct evidence".
. I have no doubt the report will go to Congress. I do not believe it will change anything. Most have already formed their opinion. Personally, I am glad the investigation is over and I hope the many serious issues facing our Country can now be addressed.

 

Wonder if Schiff is a Russian agent payed to destabilize the US?

 

I love to watch donks being led around by the nose being fed b.s. and regurgitating it like a boss. The funniest part? Y'all still don't get it.

 

Had Republicans or Trump been able to stop the Mueller investigation, Schiff would be up to bat.

As it is, we have the report carried out by an independent prosecutor, selected by Republicans, managed by Republicans.

Yet, you still are playing silly partisan games.

We just need to see the Mueller report.

Barr was totally out of line.

 

The two year investigation has ended. Done. Finished. We will all see the report, I am sure with some redactions because of legal reasons and there will without a doubt be those who still won't accept the results. In the end....it won't matter.

 

Put Mueller oader oath. Find why he allowed the delusion that the Left was pushing with all their might, that our President was a traitor and under the power of the Kremlin to go one for two years when Dirty Bob knew it was nonsense within months, if not weeks if not immediately after taking over the investigation. Why no interim reports to lift this cloud off the Presidency Why did Dirty Bob allow this destructive myth to persist for 22 months?



She made a career of this lie, now what?

 

Still won't accept the results??

We have seen NO results.

And, your "accept" thing is also targeting the notion that this is all no more than partisan politics.

America was attacked. There is no doubt about that. It's the whole reason and the ONLY reason that the Mueller investigation was started. So, yes there will be more to come, as we can't have that happen again.

 

Okay...I will check back with you

 

I think too many people are forgetting that Republicans and Democrats were interested in getting to the bottom of Russia's involvement in this election.

That is why Republicans appointed Mueller and gave him the direction he got.

Now, it's time to look at what Russia did and how they were able to do whatever it was that they did.

 

Where's your intestinal fortitude.
Please show me a quote with a link where Mueller stated precisely that "no crime of Obstruction was found"
and that "the President is exonerated" That's the original question I asked you on post 514 and you haven't answered yet. Asking a question on your post without answering mine is simply fear avoidance. How long do you keep running?

 

Show me the obstruction of justice that occurred. Who did Trump bribe? What evidence did Trump destroy? What false statement to prosecutors did he make? Who did Trump threaten with harm? What crime being investigated was obstructed. Show me where Barr and Rosenstein said Mueller presented an accusation and evidence of obstruction of justice. Show me where Mueller said he found evidence of obstruction of justice. And I'm right here.

 

All crap and fear

Please show me a quote with a link where Mueller stated precisely that "no crime of Obstruction was found"
and that "the President is exonerated" That's the original question I asked you on post 514 and you haven't answered yet. Asking questions on your post without answering mine is simply fear avoidance. How long do you keep running?

 

I have no obligation to keep repeating myself. One more time. No evidence of a crime of obstruction as found by Barr and Rosenstein and the DOJ legal counsel after Mueller gave them his findings. Exonerated.

 

The specific word that Trump was "exonerated" is not used, however the summary does exonerate him....by Barr:

Here is the paragraph right after the quote ("while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.") from the Mueller report:

The summary states that Mueller did not reach a legal conclusion because felt that determining criminal intent was outside of his jurisdiction (criminal intent is required for obstruction). Mueller could neither exonerate him nor charge him. That placed in determination of criminal intent in the AG's lap to decide.

The AG stated that the evidence is not sufficient to establish that a crime of obstruction was perpetrated. Basically, the AG is not going to file charges based on the evidence obtained to date. By definition, that is an exoneration.

 

What a bunch of lying crap. I never asked you Barr's decision not once...
Out of fear you have not answered my original question on post 427. Please show me a quote with a link where Mueller stated precisely that "no crime of Obstruction was found" and that "the President is exonerated" Lol B.S.ing your way thru is just how you work, No guts.

 

25 Russians to be arrested for helping get Trump elected, but no Russian collusion.
Trump is guilty as any three hyenas....

 

Fortunately, our laws do not declare a person guilty just because they benefited indirectly from the illegal actions of others. For collusion to exist, there would need to be proof. Mueller spent countless man-hours trying to establish that proof and it seems he came up with nothing. Your "feelings" that Trump is guilty are irrelevant.

 

Mueller did not say that according to the summary. Mueller laid out potential evidence but did not reach a conclusion as to whether there was criminal intent....which is a requirement for obstruction.

You took the "He also made it clear that he was not exonerating the President" completely out of context. He said he was doing neither charging him or exonerating him because of the "difficult issues" with the law in regards to intent. Basically it is a statement of no action.

The American people and Congress do not have the rights or authority that allows them to prosecute. That is the AG's jurisdiction. The investigation has been concluded and the AG made his determination. I seriously doubt that another investigation would be started as only the political foolish would push for one right after a 2-year investigation that took many man-hours....unless something very definitive comes out when the report is released. But keep clinging onto that Hope.....it looks good on you. Doesn't make you look desperate at all.

 

You come at the King You best not miss.

They missed.

 

Your totally wrong on your quotes Although the “‘report does not conclude that the President committed a crime,’” as Barr writes, quoting Mueller, “‘it also does not exonerate him. It's clear in Mueller's mind that Trump is not free of the possibility that he obstructed justice. Also we don't have to agree with anything that Barr says until Congress hears an unabridged version of the report. No one has to agree with Barr's interpretation..not Congress not the American people. I can see that you lack the patience to wait for a full hearing on this. Let Congress and the American people decide if further investigations are warranted not based on Barr's interpretation but based on a full hearing of the report by the American people and Congress You don't seem to understand that any new information Congress has discovered should be looked investigated despite Barr's decision.