Adam Schiff rejects reports that Mueller indictments are over, says special counsel could be called

Promises Promises Call Mueller to testify under oath, we have A LOT of questions for him.

 

Trump is the most investigated president in history and the Jury's not out on corruption and collusion except in your fantasy world.
It is Congress' jurisdiction to investigate Presidential abuse of power and theyre just getting started. Barr's cherry picked hack report is not the final say. Trump has not been found guilty because the myriad of investigations are far from having been concluded.

Also Trump has been the overlord of the largest number of political gangsters ever convicted in Presidential history.
Trump's former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, was found guilty on eight federal charges Tuesday, just an hour before Trump's longtime lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to eight counts, including illegally paying hush money for the purpose of helping Trump win the election.With previous guilty pleas from Rick Gates (2 counts), George Papadopoulus (1 count), and Mike Flynn (1 count), that brings the total number of Trump associates who have pleaded guilty to or been convicted of criminal charges in the Russia probe to five, and the total count of criminal charges on their rap sheet to 20.
You have failed to prove that any other president has been investigated on this many corruption allegations except for Trump. His investigations encompass 3 states. I win.

 

Lol same stupid crap over and over. When President Trumpenstein doesn't like the truth about himself the dumb kneejerk reaction is it's "fake new" Duh!

 

You were asked for evidence, not more grandstanding. Where is the evidence?

 

and then they always use the well Obama and Hillary did it so it's okay if Trump does it

Adam Schiffs what do you think moment was pretty damn good I thought that was real American

 

Why waste it on your limited Trump addled brainpower. To you it's all fake news and nothing more. Keep drinking the orange kool-aide

.

 

Have you seen the Cult 45 memes yet?

 

Bwaaahahahahaaa!

I actually researched that bit of Fake News came from some nutjob on Reddit.

 

Show me a quote with a link that I ever said that. More hysterical posting on your part.
Try to figure out that there's a difference between what you're saying and what I'm saying.

We already know that Mueller's team members told us that Barr the hack left out their own summaries in his report . He deliberately left out any of the heinous acts Trump committed.
Barr could have sought a court order to release grand juru testimony 9 days ago. Ago so he is definitely protecting the president.

You have proven undying support for Trump and nobody believes other wise.

Where is the Mueller Report? I've never seen it. I've only heard Barr the hacks interpretation of it. How could it be here if know one has seen it??? But you claim the report is here. . Maybe you've already read the 300 plus pages. Tell me what it says and be specific.

We already know that some of Mueller's team members told us that Barr the hack left out their own summaries in his report . He deliberately left out any of the heinous acts Trump committed and evidence of such acts.
Barr could have sought a court order to release grand jury testimony 9 days ago.So he is definitely protecting the president. Sorry you are way to naïve to understand these things.
Keep drinking the orange Kool-aide just hope it doesn't burn on it's way it goes down ​

 

That looks like lies slander and fake news, name your source.

Dems Have Vastly More to Fear From Full Mueller Report than GOP.

The NYTimes has made its latest salvo against Trump in regards to Mueller. As almost always with the paper, the article relies on anonymous sources, just as did in its now discredited Pulitzer Prize reporting on the subject. At question of course is whether Trump "obstructed" justice in a crime it is now admitted never happened. The Kafkaesque nature of this accusation is obvious. Remember Trump complaining loudly a couple of years ago that he was "wiretapped" and the media uniformly dismissing him as paranoid? Kafka indeed.

WE WON"T BE FOOLED AGAIN!

 

There is no excuse for the Mueller report to be withheld by Barr.

The summary sections that the Mueller team wrote were designed to be releasable. Besides, congressional oversight committees get sensitive information in the normal course of business.

It's growing on 2 weeks, and all we have is the contemptable Barr nonsense and stonewalling.

A subpoena is the natural recourse.

 

There is no indication that Mueller missed something.

Ignoring national security is a pervasive thread here - Russia, Trump's FL hideout, more than 2 dozen security clearances to people that can't pass background checks, dozens of indictments plus convictions and guilty pleas.

Yet, YOU don't see anything of importance here???

 

And then they promptly leak it.

Then where is the subpoena?

The full text of the Mueller report is a booby-trap for the Democrats. Sure there will be one or two tidbits to keep the heavy breathers at CNN distracted as their ratings continue to fall through the basement, but largely the report will be four hundred pages demonstrating what we all now know did not happen — i. e. collusion between Trump or anyone on his campaign and the Russians, which we have all known since these lies starting streaming out sourced to "Former and Current (Unnamed) Administration Officials".

The natural question will then be — what was all this for?

Who benefitted?

A full airing of the report, what Nadler claims he wants, will instead open the door more than ever for an investigation of why this probe was launched in the first place, by whom and for what reason. The results of that investigation will be quite scary, if not humiliating, for Democrats because that will lead close to, if not over, their highest doorstep — Obama's Oval Office.

Over the next few months we will be seeing the fight of our political lives to keep this from Obama's door, this skirmish over the report is but a tame preamble. Nadler will pussyfoot around Barr so doesn't appoint a special counsel and make life miserable for the Democrat Party straight to the election of 2020 and beyond.

Brennan needs to be placed under oath and asked who those sources were and what they said.

https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/dems-have-vastly-more-to-fear-from-full-mueller-report-than-gop/

 

Oh, sure.

Barr is obstructing on the grounds that it might hurt the Dems!!!

Where do you find these sites of yours?

 

Senate oversight committees could do that - with Republican majority.

Do you actually think Republicans will do that?

 

Preliminary evidence that Muller's evidence wasn't strong enough to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that there was collusion?

Actually I don't. If there is evidence that Trump is doing something illegal, then one would think by now with all the investigations he would be held accountable.

 

Barr is obstructing justicce.

I might agree with you if those with the power to take action were allowed to see the results of the investigation.

Without that, your claims of an investigation don't count - officials who can take action have to see the investigation, or the investigation doesn't even count.

 

How is Barr obstructing justice? He is doing his job. He will release the redacted report by mid April, and they all will get to see it.

 

There is no such thing as Justice anymore .We're certainly heading the wrong direction from being a good country

 

Oh my now the AG is obstructing justice! Hahaha. We have seen the results...no more indictments, no collusion, no obstruction!

 

The Nixon speial prosecutor handed over the information immediately.
The Clinton special proseecuttor handedd over all evidence and reports within 24 hours.

Now, Barr issued what is known to be a totally one sided report and is now into his 3rd week while working on deleting evidence that the seccure House committees have every right to see.

Sorry - that is just NOT good enough.

 

The grand jury information must remain secret under the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e), which places restrictions on the disclosure of matters occurring before a grand jury. Congress, itself is not an exception to the rule.

 

House oversight committees could to...they haven’t. Why? Because they actually realize nothing wrong is going on but they love fanning the flames of their sheep

 

No, you most definitely have NOT seen the results.

And, now we have the Mueller team pointing out that Barr is feeding you false information to cover for Trump.

 

Different laws in place regarding the special counsel and Starr who was an independent counsel and reported to Congress. You don’t like the new law take it up with Clinton, he signed it