My point is that while you may have actually read the report the degree of ignorance on this forum would demonstrate conclusively that either most haven't bothered or that most are too uneducated to understand what it says. You keep arguing with people whose knowledge comes from FOX editorials or Trump tweets and you are wasting your time trying to penetrate closed minds.
Gee, who does he report to? A newly appointed obvious Trump stooge who went so far as to lie about what the report actually said. But you are right about one thing. Congress doesn't determine crimes but it does have the ability to decide if a person who has made twelve attempts to obstruct justice and ran a campaign with obvious and documented ties to a hostile power who wanted Trump elected should continue to serve in office.
I care more about the seditious bastsrds in our country. You know, the ones who tried to disenfranchise all of the people who voted for Trump.
So what? The polls were measuring nationwide popular vote. Predicting who would win by measuring the nationwide popular vote nationwide was misusing the polling data.
You still don't care about the Russians. QED. The Orange Oaf is still in the White House, so what are you crying about?
Yep its unethical, at times its obstruction but it might not rise to the level of "beyond a reasonable doubt". What is clear its sleazy swamp behavior. When it comes to obstruction the crime is in the "attempt" not in the outcome. False equivalency. the PRESIDENT is not some private citizen trying to get off a traffic ticket. He was attempting to derail a legally constituted federal investigation into both his own and his campaigns behavior in addition to what the russians did to interfere. Plenty of still unanswered questions, some convenient encrypted and/or deleted comms, some can't recalls include 33 from trump his own "stable genius, one of the great memories of all time" self. But further investigation will. False equivalency yet again. It doesn't matter what obama did or didn't do, it only matters what trump and his minions did before and after he was elected. You know when congressional oversight became non-existent.
I do accept his report. But it seems you can only understand it in bullshit bumpersticker terms. odd how you get "does not exonerate" to mean exoneration from the report - fantasy cannot replace reality no matter how hard you try.
You said that; not me. I said that I care more about the seditious bastards. You know; they swore an oath to defend America from its enemies, both foreign and domestic. Do you care about America's domestic enemies?
Actually what he said was there wasn't enough evidence to prove criminal conspiracy. And he also said that the lies, withholding of evidence, the unavailability of witnesses, and of course Trump's failure to actually answer questions contribulted to the possible lack of evidence
I didn’t say I did. I don’t believe in te American legal system that’s the job of prosecutors. They determine if they have enough evidence to charge, a very low standard. Here they couldn’t. Hence why they said he didn’t commit a crime
Only in a court of law. And there was plenty of evidence as documented in the Mueller report. Face fact. If a Democratic President had been supported and aided in the election by Russia and had made at least twelve attempts to obstruct justice thwarted only by his own appointees who disobeyed his orders the Republicans would have impeached the President in a second if they had the power.
His name is Donald. He is a dick only in his actions. As Stormy said it was the most unsatisfying five seconds of my life. And he is for sure the enemy of everything good America used to stand for.
Mueller Report: A Lawyer's Analysis (Real Law Review) An explanation by a lawyer of how Trump is in no way "exonerated" by the Mueller report. It could have found Trump innocent, but could not have found him guilty. Anyone who isn't in Trump's camp will probably already be aware of this from the excellent reporting in the real news media.
