Mueller Report

Discussion in 'United States' started by FlamingLib, Apr 18, 2019.

  1. superbadbrutha

    superbadbrutha Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Messages:
    52,269
    Likes Received:
    6,446
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Nothing to deal with, he tried to get McGahn to fire him or are you calling McGahn a liar.
     
  2. Reasonablerob

    Reasonablerob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2018
    Messages:
    9,926
    Likes Received:
    3,892
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Irrelevant, Trump had ample cause for suspecting Mueller, that he was bitter at not being promoted (like Mark 'Deep Throat' Felt), that he was friends with Comey whom Trump fired, that he used to work for a law firm employed by the DNC. As it happened, he was wrong as McGahn convinced him.
     
    glitch likes this.
  3. superbadbrutha

    superbadbrutha Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Messages:
    52,269
    Likes Received:
    6,446
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It wasn't irrelevant to Mueller.
     
  4. Reasonablerob

    Reasonablerob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2018
    Messages:
    9,926
    Likes Received:
    3,892
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm not surprised but Mueller couldn't claim it reached the level of criminal obstruction, he was quite clear about that and the AG and his deputy concurred with him. Even Congressional dems now agree there will be no impeachment so where does that leave the conspiracy theorists?
     
    glitch likes this.
  5. superbadbrutha

    superbadbrutha Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Messages:
    52,269
    Likes Received:
    6,446
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No Mueller couldn't charge under the current policy of the DOJ, he believes Trump is guilty as hell.
     
  6. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Just as Mueller (and Rosenstein and Comey et al) had ample cause for suspecting Trump.
     
  7. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    19,874
    Likes Received:
    8,447
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That’s right, Clinton was a vagina grabbing skirt chaser that cheated on his wife. Then a high powered Washington Republican lawyer somehow hooked up with one of those grabbed and took it all the way to the US Supreme Court and forced Clinton to testify while he was President, then nailed him for lying about his consensual sexual affair. I am sure that there are several Democrat lawyers looking for one of the girls Trump has grabbed right now. When that happens, I am sure you guys won’t mind.
     
  8. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Paula Jones case was filed for events that took place before he assumed office. Her attonrey, Joseph Cammarata, is a DNC donor, the other Gilbert K. Davis, is a small town attorney. Of course they took it to the SCOTUS, because the President attempt to block and kill the case at every turn, he keep losing an it was appealed to the SCOTUS and in a landmark case the SCOTUS the President wasn't immune from Civil liablity for acts that took place before he assumed office, as he attempted to argue.

    In regards to Trump, you all did try....remember your hero? Avenatti? How'd that work out for you all?
     
    glitch and Thought Criminal like this.
  9. Reasonablerob

    Reasonablerob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2018
    Messages:
    9,926
    Likes Received:
    3,892
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Evidence please? Mueller said he didn't have enough evidence to accuse Trump of a criminal acts, not he believed him guilty but couldn't go after him because he was the president?
     
    glitch likes this.
  10. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    16,724
    Likes Received:
    9,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He specifically stated that he couldn't indict a sitting (on his brains) "presuhdint" in the report.

    Look it up.
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2019
  11. Reasonablerob

    Reasonablerob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2018
    Messages:
    9,926
    Likes Received:
    3,892
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You're right but the difference is Clinton lied about his affair under oath which is blatant perjury, Trump never has.
     
  12. Reasonablerob

    Reasonablerob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2018
    Messages:
    9,926
    Likes Received:
    3,892
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Give me the quote or link?
     
  13. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    16,724
    Likes Received:
    9,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're testing my patience by being UnreasonableRob:

    “while the OLC opinion concludes that a sitting president may not be prosecuted, it recognizes that a president does not have immunity after he leaves office.” Given that “a criminal investigation during a president’s term is permissible,” the report also stated that due to “the strong public interest in safeguarding the integrity of the criminal justice system, we conducted a thorough factual investigation in order to preserve the evidence when memories were fresh and documentary materials available.”
     
  14. Reasonablerob

    Reasonablerob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2018
    Messages:
    9,926
    Likes Received:
    3,892
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    By demanding evidence?

    And? It just says they conducted the investigation now even though they couldn't prosecute Trump whilst he was in office. It doesn't say they couldn't prosecute him because he was in office, they just say they hadn't the evidence to.
     
  15. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    19,874
    Likes Received:
    8,447
    Trophy Points:
    113
    George Conway, Kelleyann’s husband represented Jones. The whole deal was politically motivated. Don’t worry, soon if the Russian deal falls through like Whitewater did, one or more of the vaginas Trump grabbed will hook up with a big Democrat law firm and call his ass on the carpet. That’s post Watergate politics. What I find amusing is that many of those who cheered while Clinton was being pilloried and jumped for joy when he was impeached are now whining like a bunch of little girls when their chosen skirt chasing whore with sleazy business deals lurking in his past is getting the same treatment. And like Stanley Kowalski, I say Ha Ha Ha!
     
  16. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    16,724
    Likes Received:
    9,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    By demanding something readily available to you.

    I'm not your research assistant. Use google.
     
  17. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He later joined, the case, during the Appeal stages, but the two names I mentinoed were her orginal attorneys. No actually, Paula Jones was in fact an employee of Clinton's in his Arkansas days. You can refer to the current President with all those names all you want, but the reality is some big Dem lawyer tried to bring him down for some civil stuff related to a prior alledged affair and it backfired. He hasn't been convicted of anything, or settled any case out of court like Clinton...nor been impeached because a Special recommmended prosecution....like the guy you supported, and wanted back in the Whitehouse.
     
  18. superbadbrutha

    superbadbrutha Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2006
    Messages:
    52,269
    Likes Received:
    6,446
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Where did he state he didn't have enough evidence?
     
  19. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    19,874
    Likes Received:
    8,447
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I voted for Perot both times. However I have never seen a bigger sissy than Trump nor have I ever seen a bigger bunch of crybabies than his lackeys in the media and his fanboys.

    BTW: Trump has settled numerous cases out of court for cheating people in business deals and running scams like Trump University.
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2019
  20. Reasonablerob

    Reasonablerob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2018
    Messages:
    9,926
    Likes Received:
    3,892
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You make an assertion you must justify it.
     
  21. Reasonablerob

    Reasonablerob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2018
    Messages:
    9,926
    Likes Received:
    3,892
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He said he couldn't call Trump's actions in regard to the report as meeting the criminal level of obstruction, he left that to the AG and his deputy, they have agreed as has now congress.
     
  22. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When has he settled a case for sexual harassment. I think it's great you voted for Ross....ironically though I haven't seen a bigger group of babies then the modern day Dembots. It's almost comically the way you all get so bent out of shape for the way Trump plays you all like a fiddle, and just how sore a losers you all for choking in 2016
     
  23. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    16,724
    Likes Received:
    9,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I’m telling you what The Mueller Report said, not what “my claim” is. That’s not too difficult to figure out.

    Look it up for yourself instead of asking other people to quote it for you.
     
  24. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2012
    Messages:
    16,724
    Likes Received:
    9,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Once again, no he didn’t. Read the report for yourself.
     
    Last edited: Apr 23, 2019
  25. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    19,874
    Likes Received:
    8,447
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I voted for Johnson/Weld.
     

Share This Page