Le'ts say the father decided to choose. So he secretly, using pills forces her to abort. Nice guy eh? He did not hurt her body according to American democrats.
This no good non person is aborted by the father delivering abortion medicine. Guess he did not hurt a person nor her body. Works for me.
Hypothesis: The Pregnant Woman Is Really A Binary Being And Both Have Rights. Like a Star Trek Trill and the Symbiont https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dax_(Star_Trek) https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Trill_symbiont https://www.google.com/search?ei=0t...ws-wiz.......0i71j0j0i22i30j0i333.ZY-i8_in88M Time to reject the "my body" argument. Advertise abortion options. Create options of adoption. Such as biological family contact. Maternity Homes. Advertise. Advertise. Advertise! Like the ole days.
Having an ABORTION when you cannot care for an UNWANTED child IS taking personal responsibility! Too bad that those opposed to women's rights are OBLIVIOUS to that REALITY!
You are still entitled to your misinformed opinion but neither Science nor the Law support your immoral absurdities since neither are impacted by your opinion.
And you would be WRONG! Any woman engaging in that kind of activity is far MORE LIKELY to be using RELIABLE contraception because becoming pregnant would be a hindrance.
1. Why does it not matter if the Governor that signed is a woman or not? I ask because I keep hearing of outrage that it is men making this law that disproportionately impacts women but it isn't. That Governor appears (but actually isn't maybe?) pro life. 2. Women can still control their own bodies. They have reproductive controls men can only dream about. 3. I think women lose power if they say, "hey, I'm pregnant, I want to have the baby and I will need help" and the response is, "your mundane choice. you deal with it." 4. I thought pro-life Catholics were a strong Democratic party constituents. 44 to 37 Dem to Republican. (19% na) https://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/religious-tradition/catholic/party-affiliation/ . I doubt the issue is monolithic, Republicans vs. Democrats on pro life, pro choice.
Oh , yes, deary...that is just so clever !...because you posted that great bit of wit I'm sure women will all stop having abortions this very minute...
No it isn't. Taking personal responsibility would be first of all not having sex before you you are inva permanent relationship and have the means to support a child.
Science doesn't support yours either andcas we discussed the law only supports it because of activist judges.
FoxHastings said: ↑ The GOVERNOR signed the bil, does NOT matter if it was female or male. Of course women retaining the right to their own bodies makes them more powerful! That's why Repubs want to take away that right It doesn't. Ya, the Alabama legislature is mostly white males....the way Alabama likes it... Yes, the governor is Anti-Choice, Anti-Woman's rights.....women can be sexist misogynists just like men can... NO, in state like Alabama if they become pregnant they lose the right to their own bodies and are FORCED to gestate. Alabama has such a great history as a slave state and want to bring that back... Uh, what? I'm not sure what you mean by that. Not sure of your point but Catholics have abortions. And yes, generally Democrats are for EVERYONE, even women having rights …..and Repubs are NOT, obviously, or they wouldn't take away women's right to their own bodies...
Seems you took a short cut from people not wanting abortions happening, to people wanting to control women's bodies. Even so, I do think we have to get off this kick of, "we need choice because we must not control women's bodies". I was in the military and was told if I did something in my free time that got me too injured to do my duties, such as getting a massive sunburn, I would be sanctioned for damaging government property. I can be conscripted to fight, kill, and even die in war. As long as there is due process, I can be put to death. So, yeah, the government owns us. I mention Catholics but should have been more general. Is there a pro life wing of the Democrat party? Is there a wing of pro choice among Republicans. I'd think so. I haven quantified and am reviewing further. I do think if Republicans were as controlling as you appear to think, we'd have government run brothels where women were conscripted to have sex with strangers so the strangers won't feel the need to have a woman in their life. Perhaps an IVF draft. The Republicans don't want that. Yet, we do have spending programs so that women will not need men in their lives. A different topic worth it's own thread.
NEWSFLASH! Married Women Have Abortions! https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-states The MAJORITY of women who have abortions are in stable relationships! Looks like yet another FALLACY of those who HATE women's rights just crashed and burned! Abortions IS taking PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY! It is the height of IRRESPONSIBILITY to ENSLAVE women and FORCE them to bring UNWANTED children into this world.
FoxHastings said: ↑ The GOVERNOR signed the bil, does NOT matter if it was female or male. Of course women retaining the right to their own bodies makes them more powerful! That's why Repubs want to take away that right It doesn't. Ya, the Alabama legislature is mostly white males....the way Alabama likes it... Yes, the governor is Anti-Choice, Anti-Woman's rights.....women can be sexist misogynists just like men can... NO, in state like Alabama if they become pregnant they lose the right to their own bodies and are FORCED to gestate. Alabama has such a great history as a slave state and want to bring that back... Uh, what? I'm not sure what you mean by that. Not sure of your point but Catholics have abortions. And yes, generally Democrats are for EVERYONE, even women having rights …..and Repubs are NOT, obviously, or they wouldn't take away women's right to their own bodies... NO, that is what the Alabama legislature did...and any other state that bans abortion. Nothing wrong with not wanting abortions ( so don't have one, duh) but that's hardly the same as taking away women's right to their own body which the Alabana legislature did and it is the definition of slavery... Wrong again, women need choice because they are American citizen who should have the same rights as everyone else. YOU were never forced to use your body to grow another person. So? Ya, that's another thread ..
You have posted this tripe 3 times that I know of..... So I'll ask for the third time..IF a woman's fetus is NOT her body then whose is it? ( NO one has ever answered that) If it's the governments' fetus , like it is now in Alabama, then the government should pay ALL it's expenses from conception to cradle to grave...
