Republican's Latest Monumental Faux Pas

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by opion8d, Jun 10, 2019.

  1. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Who says?
     
  2. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Where does it say that in the constitution?
     
  3. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Who says?
    Killing the unborn is not choice. It's the antithesis of choice.
     
  4. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,841
    Likes Received:
    11,316
    Trophy Points:
    113
    An individual has to take responsibility for a human life they create inside them.
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2019
  5. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,841
    Likes Received:
    11,316
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That statement fundamentally makes no sense, or at least it relies on so many levels of suppositions, it comes across as absurd.

    What are these rights and who are these people, specifically, that you think everyone else has?

    Are you saying you think it's somehow unfair if women in state A have a right to abort but women in state B do not, and so that must mean women in state B must have that same right because women in state A do?

    Or are you talking about within each state? In that case, no one within that jurisdiction has the right to abort, so it's not like the women don't have the same rights that everyone else has.

    Or are you saying it's unfair to single out pregnant women? And that since this law doesn't apply to everyone who does not happen to be pregnant, it must not be fair?
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2019
  6. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Obviously it is you that is struggling to keep up because NO ONE is doing what you are erroneously alleging.
     
    Mr_Truth and FoxHastings like this.
  7. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Law of the Land!
     
    Mr_Truth and FoxHastings like this.
  8. Derideo_Te

    Derideo_Te Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50,653
    Likes Received:
    41,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Having an abortion IS taking responsibility when you are unable to care for an UNWANTED CHILD!
     
    Mr_Truth and FoxHastings like this.
  9. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FoxHastings said:
    An individual doesn't have the right to force another individual to use their body to sustain their life.



    It does not have to specifically spell that out.


    Do you really believe that someone can FORCE you to give them your blood, or kidney, or liver or eye or heart to sustain their life???

    Where does it say THAT in the Constitution?
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  10. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,841
    Likes Received:
    11,316
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is the woman being required to permanently give up any of her organs?

    Didn't the woman cause this situation she now finds herself in, wherein another human life now requires temporary residence inside and use of her body?

    If you cause a car accident, and the accident victim requires a transfusion of a very rare blood type to survive, one that you happen to have, don't you believe you should be required to provide it?
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2019
  11. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113

    As I have told you dozens of times, American women should have the right to their own body in America.

    Everyone has a right to their own body and if that makes no sense to you then if I need a healthy heart transplant then I'll send my people to your home and I, according to you, have a right to forcefully take your heart and use it to sustain my life.

    The fetus has no rights and it certainly doesn't have the right to use a woman's body to sustain it's life. If it did that would mean it had MORE rights than anyone else.


    How many times do you want me to go over that for you? Another dozen time?
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  12. Lee Atwater

    Lee Atwater Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2017
    Messages:
    45,907
    Likes Received:
    26,943
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The problem being religoids consider protoplasmic goo created at conception to be a person with a soul. It's a religious belief, not a scientific one.
     
    Derideo_Te, 9royhobbs and FoxHastings like this.
  13. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,841
    Likes Received:
    11,316
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That statement is different from 'women have the same right to their own body as everyone else'.

    Those seem to be two inherently different arguments.
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2019
  14. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, but she is using almost her entire body t sustain the life of a fetus....it is USING HER BODY PARTS.



    OH the OLD "she asked for it so let's punish her"" CRAP.




    :) Thank you for admitting the fetus USES HER BODY !!!!!:)

    Doesn't matter what you or I believe, the LAW says I have NO obligation and cannot be forced to give blood.


    As I have explained to you dozens of times...
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  15. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113


    The law and common sense


    NO ONE said killing a fetus is choice, it is one option, one CHOICE..
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  16. Texas Republican

    Texas Republican Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Messages:
    28,121
    Likes Received:
    19,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. Dems have said it’s immoral to deny anyone entry into the U.S.
     
  17. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So are you equating abortion with murder now?
     
  18. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ah yes. Bad humans. Been hearing that all my long life with predictions that never come true.
     
  19. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FoxHastings said:
    No, not at all:

    You said:
    Hoosier8 said:
    Just forwarding a natural argument why birth is an extension of life. The modern world, especially the Western world makes life less valuable.""

    You implied people valued life more before the world was "modern"....and that simply isn't true...


    FoxHastings said:
    Ya, there were no murders or wars before 1960, or a thousand years ago or 2 thousand years agpo….no murders, no wars, everyone got along and populated the earth and then women got the right to their own body re-instated and the whole world went to hell.....NOT.



    No, that would be you.

    Nice diversion from your finding out how wrong you were about the history of the world :)
     
  20. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your diversion was murder when talking about birth. You must not follow your own train of thought.
     
  21. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The can be changed.
    No choice for the fetus?
     
  22. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not religious.

    You don't have to be religious to cherish the unborn.
     
  23. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You said:
    Hoosier8 said:
    Just forwarding a natural argument why birth is an extension of life. The modern world, especially the Western world makes life less valuable.""

    You implied people valued life more before the world was "modern"....and that simply isn't true...


    FoxHastings said:
    Ya, there were no murders or wars before 1960, or a thousand years ago or 2 thousand years agpo….no murders, no wars, everyone got along and populated the earth and then women got the right to their own body re-instated and the whole world went to hell.....NOT.





    No, that would be you.





    And YOU make it obvious ( with every repetition) that you cannot refute one word of my post :)
     
    Derideo_Te likes this.
  24. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,025
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FoxHastings said:
    The law and common sense





    The law hasn't been changed in 50 years and NO, you can't change common sense...


    NONE.

    NOW do what NO other Anti-Choicer has ever done....EXPLAIN how a fetus would make a choice even if it had the right to.


    HOW? HOW does a fetus make a choice????? Call his Congressman on his cell phone????
     
  25. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The law was created by man and can be changed by man.

    Do you understand now?
     

Share This Page