Trump: I think 'I'd take' foreign help for 2020

You mean when Mueller lied claiming he could not report anything negative then filled the report with innuendo?

 

Minute 1:04: Stephanopoulos: "But even your own polls show that you're down right now, don't they?"

 

Why looking at your “patriotic” drawing leaves me stone cold?

Because what’s good for the Democrats is finally good for the Republicans. You don’t like it when someone doing unto you what you’ve always done unto others?

Good. deal with it.

 

News flash: Hillary leads in every poll.

 

The man is a traitor to this country. He's not even trying to hide it anymore. And yet, his supporters have absolutely no problem with him being willing to sell out America. his cult-like apologists are either the same or in deep denial, and none of them can muster up enough patriotism and love for their country to deny him the opportunity to cheat the system a second time.

 

I do not hold Trump to ANY standards, I take what he dishes out.

And what he dishes out to Liberals, is good for America. Even if you don’t think so, Trump’s **** is good for you.

 

Congrats for that patriotic stand!! I wish those nutty founding fathers had found a way to work that inspiring statement into the Declaration of Independence...

I personally am moved to tears....

 

My friend,

I have 3 years of Trump’s presidency to look back at, and what I see I like - have nothing to do with my patriotic stand. Sorry you’ misunderstood me.

 

That is not a quote from Mueller.

 

News flash. The current year is 2019.

 

News flash. 2016 was but a 3 years ago. What has changed? Do you have a candidate running that is better than Hillary? Who? Who?

 

So if a Brit said he had some information on the Democrat candidate he would look at it and turn it over to the FBI, so what? Isn't that what the DNC/Clinton campaign did?

 

I thought we were just talking about the Russian false accusation...but we can get into Vol 2 if you want as well...from the Conclusion Section there "..his report does not conclude that the President committed a crime.."

 

News flash: Same **** different day.

 

How would you know? You don’t know anything about the Mueller Report other than what Trump bellowed.

And since he gave you a four word slogan to bellow, you’ve got all the facts you need.

No need to actually know what you’re talking about !

 

You supported getting dirt on Trump from Russia so what doesn't make sense is your opposition here.

 

And the Clinton campaign looked at it first and then informed the FBI, exactly what Trump said he would do. The difference is she went looking for it and contracting for it. If someone in France told Bernie Sanders they had some information on Trump and his business dealings you think he would turn it down?

 

Clearly the "five eyes" agreement was intended to improve intel collection, and be that as it may, it was ultimately abused. To what extent we don't know yet, but probably to some degree we'll find out. The provision Obama chose to authorize on election day, made it possible for persons like Steele, and Halper to be provided with classified intel. It also meant that persons like Clapper, and Brennan could stay informed after Trump took office. The unmasking scandal was minimized partly because Obama eased the rules before Trump entered the picture, but, Clapper / Brennan submitted unmasking requests in UN Amb. Powers name. So this intel by proxy scheme was a strategy Obama meant to keep in place after leaving office.

 

You mean I don't follow the left's hysterical narrative about the report.

 

Wrong.

 

It does make sense, what you want to have happen in life and the reality of what does happen, dosn't always coexist.

 

Ah, facts are not your thing. Got it.

 

You made that up, again.

The Conclusion section of the Mueller Report actually says something quite different.

“Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgement, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President’s conduct....At the same time, if we had confidence, after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state.

Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we were unable to reach that judgement. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it does not exhonorate him.”

See pp,444

On page 442, it says this:

“And the protection of the criminal justice system from corrupt acts by any person-including the President-accords with the fundamental principle of our government that “no person in this country is so high that he is above the law”.

You can consider yourself corrected.

 

And the "Steele Dossier" was not information - it was disinformation.

 

And if the shoe were on the other foot, the republicans would do the same thing if Hillary were President. Both parties are a part of the same hypocrisy.