Should Barack Obama be nominated to the Supreme Court?

White flag noted. I acknowledge your total inability to support the demonstrably false claim you made.

 

But we know beyond all doubt that he didn’t.

It doesn’t exist. We know beyond doubt he was born in Hawaii.

 

Its a simple fact in question on which your premise depends, , not some esoteric philosophical discussion. If you make an affirmative assertion of fact like these ethics complaints inducing the Obamas to surrender their licences. , its up to you to prove that ethics complaints induced them to surrender their licenses. But you can't prove that there was any ethics complaints against either Obama can you? Can't prove that they did anything as lawyers that was anything other than consistent with the Bar's ethical standards. You never could. You are not interested in doing so. You just wanted to pass along another smear, another innuendo and waltz away. Well I won't let you. I won't let you turn this discussion into anything larger or anything smaller than the seeds you helped plant here defending that filthy lie. Admit you have no case. Admit this whole story was nothing more than mud-slinging and defamatory garbage by RW blogsphere.

No matter what you type, I will ask you for the links and citations that prove the premise of this anti-Obama trashtalk.

 

Utopia does sound good but the knack is having the skill to realise that.

 

My only response to this is a clear no.

Barack Obama handed over ICANN to the UN and have shown he can't be trusted.

 

Relax, it was a bad joke, but no worse than actually thinking Obama should be anywhere near the government ever again. He shouldn't even be considered for a janitor position much less a judiciary posting...

 

Are you talking to a mirror again or just can't understand sarcasm?

The only false claims so far have been yours and your fellow Obama supporters.

 

You do realize that denial of facts is stupid, right?

Even his own family says different that you claim, but you know better (if it fits your worshipful attitude) and cannot abide for it to be show to be false.

BTW, who is this "we" you speak of? Voices in your head again?

 

No, it is up to you to disprove the statements, since you so firmly believe they are false. Fact is, you can't.

You continue to demand links and citations because that is how you get your thoughts. Nothing original or self derived. Those that can't think for themselves always rely on the statements of others in the hope that they will appear relevant in the discussion. Doesn't work, ever.

 

I’ve proven every single assertion I’ve made. Everyone has noted your total inability to do the same.

 

Of course. Which is why I have no idea what you keep doing it

No they don’t.

We is literally everyone who has been alive since 2008 when he proved it. That includes you.

 

You have "proven" nothing except that you totally buy into the myth that is Obama and his goodness. Total opposite of the truth, but that is expected from one such as you.

 

There you go into fantasy land again. You claim to speak for all but I suspect that you only converse with those that agree with you. Small as that group is.

 

I proved your moronic claim regarding Obama’s law license false. As you well know. I proved he is the only president who has proven his eligibility. As you well know.

 

Its not my job to disprove anything. . I did not write a post offering up some pile of innuendo in a chainmail. Now stop dodging and weaving and prove that these ethics complaints exist against both of the Obamas, which the Illinois Bar says do not exist. Then you can prove that the Obamas both surrendered their licenses, as opposed to asking that they be put on inactive status. Here's the link Factcheck, now see if you can amass more credible evidence for your allegation, than Factcheck did to debunk it. https://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/ Hell how about you produce ANY credible evidence at all.

 

Trump is talking about stealing money from the military to pay for his wall, Trump sees the military as a piggy bank to steal from

 

Trying to mind read again? First, you have to have a working mind and second the ability to admit that you are wrong. again.

BTW, with all of his lies and fabrications, illicit acts while in office have totally disqualified him except to bigoted "progressive" fools who refuse to hold him accountable.

 

Where as democrats see social security as their piggy bank and constantly steal from it.

 

Your violent reaction and anger prove my point. You dismiss a truth yet support someone who has managed to hide his birth certificate, educational records and have the media cover for him at all turns. And you wonder why your "evidence" is called into question. That and the many notable lies by Obama which go to show that he is less than honest or truthful, especially about himself.

For once, try to think with your brain instead of that of another fawning idol worshipper. Just once.

 

None of this moronic rant changes the fact your claims were demonstrably false, which I proved.

 

Nobody flip flops more than Obama so he's perfect for the court system. He sometimes fakes himself out in attempts to disagree with the GOP. Just tell him the GOP supports open borders and he'll oppose it.

 

1. You, Republicans, & the media have consistently referred to those incarcerated along our southern border as "immigrants." But immigrants are those who want to move here for economic or reasons that involve improving personal opportunities for a better life. Immigrants don't generally leave their homeland without money & at least some of their personal possessions. Refugees generally seek asylum or safety from life threatening situations beyond their control. They often leave their homeland spontaneously, unplanned, & often without money or personal possessions. Refugees generally don't plan immigrating. They are forced into it by events.
2. I try to give credit where it's due, regardless of political party, persuasion, or ideology. All humans are a blending of positives & negatives, successes & failures--including myself. I am a liberal, & I strongly disagree with the current extremist ideology of the Trump-Republican Party, & the policies & practices & behaviors of Trump himself. But in spite of my philosophical differences with them, I know they have elements of good within them all as individuals, & I wish for them happiness & other successes in their lives--just not as politicians who can disrupt the lives of others.

 

1. I strongly disagree with Trump's philosophy, policies, & personal behaviors, but I "hate" no one. I hope the American voters retire Trump back to his tower in 2020, but I wish him every success in the one area he seems to actually have an emotional connection with--amassing wealth. I just don't want him to continue dragging this nation into his twisted personal reality, where only materialism & power are valued, & other, more significant values are dismissed & ignored altogether.
2. It's on the internet & Youtube. I believe it's referred to as the "Access Hollywood Tape." Please watch it & you'll hear Trump himself bragging about it.
3. It doesn't really matter. The fact that he said it at all, about anyone, is the problem. He, like you or me, is permitted to argue different perspectives on public issues. But to attack those who have different views than you, in a personal demeaning, & intentionally damaging way, should NOT be permitted--not even by a President.

 

My personal goal isn't utopia, but notable improvement. But even that requires the asset you so aptly identify in your post.

 

Maybe your enunciation wasn't clear enough to begin with. And I love irony.