It is and the data is linked to so you can crunch it yourself and come up with an objection other than "it's stupid"
How long did it take you to find a website with a definition that suited your needs? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle https://www.britannica.com/technology/assault-rifle
Except you wanted to trash it because you want to replace its founding principles as they are not something you hold with. You were clutching your pearls at the very idea of natural right theory earlier, now you think a nice coat of paint will fix it
Handguns have been used to kill more people than any other weapon in mass shootings. By a wide margin,.
Wow, that's the 3rd time you falsely accused me, when I have posted I don't care if one carries. I also clearly stated the conditions have to be right.
No. It is a right given by humans to themselves. Nothing fundamental or inherent about it. Just a human construct.
Have you wondered why yours is the only example that includes semi-auti rifles that -look- like actual assault rifles?
You know, all of that talk about "law-abiding gun owners" is getting ripe. Are they insinuating that people who own guns are naturally law-abiding? Are they insinuating that owning a gun inspires one to become law-abiding? Or are they simply saying that some gun owners are law-abiding and some are not? I say put a ban all guns and then it'll be easy to know who's law-abiding and who isn't.
Oh how hawkish! "Man the walls, the Americans are coming for our guns." I suspect "you" have had that silly nonsense hammered into you since you were a kid playing coyboys and indians. Reality is totally different. If 'you' reckon you can defeat the might of the USA Military, I do hope you never tell China how to do it.
Anti-gun activist Democrat lawmaker was selling rocket launchers. Sounds to me like he was anti-gun so he could make a profit from contraband guns.......that's my point.
