Trump says Justice Brett Kavanaugh should ‘start suing people’ after new report of sexual misconduct

Trump says Justice Brett Kavanaugh should ‘start suing people’ after new report of sexual misconduct

Trump says Justice Brett Kavanaugh should ‘start suing people’ after new report of sexual misconduct.

• President Donald Trump said that Justice Brett Kavanaugh should “start suing people” or the Department of Justice “should come to his rescue” on Sunday.
• The comments came in response to an article in The New York Times that surfaced a previously unreported allegation of sexual misconduct from the justice’s time as an undergraduate at Yale University.

President Donald Trump said that Justice Brett Kavanaugh should “start suing people” or the Department of Justice “should come to his rescue” on Sunday in response to an article in The New York Times that surfaced a previously unreported allegation of sexual misconduct from the justice’s time as an undergraduate at Yale University.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/15/trump-says-kavanaugh-should-start-suing-after-new-allegation.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There were never investigations done by the FBI regarding these allegations, they stifled it for the republicans who wanted to push Kavanaugh through as fast as possible. The public was made aware at that time of Kavanaugh's confirmation that these other allegations were not investigated by the FBI. Ask yourself why not?

Brett Kavanaugh has gotten away with despicable conduct all his life. Brett Kavanaugh didn't even get the 51 votes that he was supposed to get, he only got 50 thanks to Lisa Murkowski who voted for him as a 'favor to a friend in Congess'. The republicans were desperate to get him on the bench. Kavanaugh had a history of sexual assault. He was the 5th guy in a gang-rape the one that came in drunk and everyone encouraged him and told him he could get away with it, and he did. He's been covered up for his entire life.

Out of all the well-qualified people that Trump could have nominated for the SC and other positions, he has constantly nominated people that beat, abuse and sexually assault women. Kavanaugh lied to the U.S. Senate and Castro and Harris are calling for his impeachment.

 

It is not actually a new claim ,it was made at the time of all the hullaballoo into Kavanaugh's confirmation but went uninvestigated by the FBI at the time???Why the FBI did not investigate this claim, and others, at that same time will be up to them to explain.

 

Because the women to whom this was alleged to have occurred says she has no memory of it. The only other statements were hearsay.

The NYT paid two reports for 10 months to come up with nothing, they interviewed neither people involved print a story to promote a book and take 9 paragraphs to once again state there is no evidence it occurred.

 

Yeah, maybe should have called on someone more credible than Ford, or at least a better liar. Her week long actress boot camp made her the laughing stock. Me thinks RBG’s Health must be fading and the left is scared of trump seating her replacement.

 

I, and many others believe Christine Blasey Ford. The 'fix' was in for Kavanaugh. He's a liar and belongs in prison for lying to get on the SC

 

Why would you believe baseless accusations?

 

It would be a waste of resources for the FBI to investigate b******* claims.

I think Justice Kavanaugh has behaved admirably I not going after mrs. Ford for her slander.

 

based on what evidence?

the burden is on the accuser so present what evidence you have that dr. Ford was telling the truth.

 

Hard to do when there was nothing for which to call anyone.

 

Based on what? What corroboration did she have? What did she have to refute HER OWN witnesses saying the party never occurred? Why do you CHOOSE to believe a totally unsubstantiated accusation shot full holes when it was inquired into? Why do you just automatically find Kanevaugh guilty of something?

 

Based on her testimony and the other allegations that were not investigated by the FBI intentionally.

 

Under what journalistic standards did the NYT print this story and these women publish a book? All they have is hearsay evidence for something the even the victim says didn't happen.

 

In this case, the FBI SHOULD have investigated ALL claims. This was a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court, the highest court in the land and we should never have a liar on the Supreme Court. The other allegations should have been thoroughly investigated. PERIOD

 

They did investigate, she had no corroboration and her own witnesses refuted her story. What did they miss in her story? The other allegations were investigated and found without merit. And we now know that she lied about her motivations.

 

They did and found no merit to them.

 

Deep State FBI....

 

If the woman says he raped her, she can say it or write about it whenever she wants and the NYT has every right to print it. If she is lying and it can be proven, it’s on her and she should be arrested, prosecuted and sued for libel and slander. What if she is telling the truth? Do you think Kavanaugh should be removed?

 

Their desperation to tear down the conservative-stacked SC in increasing to a fever pitch, and #MeToo slander tactics is all they have.

 

Wrong.

That allegations against kavanaugh were thoroughly investigated and found to have no merit.

He did not lie and is well qualified. The accusations against him were baseless and without any supporting evidence and lacking in any credibility.

The latest accusation is even worse.

Kavanaugh does NOT have a history of of sexual assault and to say he does is an outright false accusation

 

No

Investigate away.

The latest accusation is a massive failure.

It does not even constitute an accusation that Kavanaugh assaulted a woman. It si actually an accusation that OTHER men assaulted a woman using Kavanaugh's penis which is of course idiotic and ludicrous.

 

no evidence he lied and Ford has no supporting evidence whatsoever.

The burden of proof is on her and we now know she was politically motivated. Her attorney has admitted her motive.

Belief is not enough and the principle of presumption of evidence applies

 

The alleged victim does not corroborate the story. She has made no allegation. They didn't' even interview her.

 

I would personally be embarrassed to claim I believed Ford.

 

EVERGREEN HEADLINE: The New York Times Anti-Kavanaugh Bombshell Is Actually a Dud.

The person they claim he assaulted doesn't remember anything like what the Fake News America Hating NYT claims.

Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly write in a New York Times story adapted from their forthcoming anti-Kavanaugh book, is this: “Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student.”

So Kavanaugh supposedly has his pants down, a guy grabs his wang and puts it into the hands of a female student? How plausible is that?

Who are the friends? Who is the female student? Were there any witnesses besides Stier?

The woman Stier claims this happened to doesn't remember anything like that ever happening to her. Which the NYT's leaves out. Do they not even care anymore about maintaining any semblance of integrity?

If you take this confusing accusation in the essay at face value, it doesn’t even appear to be an allegation of assault against Kavanaugh.

If Kavanaugh’s “friends grabbed his penis,” then isn’t it an allegation of wrongdoing against Kavanaugh’s “friends,” not Kavanaugh? I've never attended a Yalie non-sexual “naked parties” but if this is what happened, both the female student and Kavanaugh are victims in this alleged incident. The Fake News NYT's doesn't appear to even claim that college-aged Kavanaugh consented to have his “friends” “grab, much less push his penis.”

You know what this story is missing? The Porn Lawyer.

 

And Stier is a political/legal foe of Kavenaugh who refuses to confirm or even discuss the matter anymore probably because he's afraid he's going to get himself in legal trouble.