Climate Activist Greta

Interesting... So, if you refuse to turn over all information you to a partisan hack means that everything you say is an incompetent lie?

 

Sweet. So, if I cited say a publication that suggests that at least 500 really smart people , including their creds, that would satisfy you? That we don't have anything to worry about? Up to you. I have tons of time..

 

She was obviouly coached and used. That is pathetic.

 

QQ, but do you suppose that AllState has a financial stake in getting you to buy their insurance products? I mean, you know what "marketing" is, right?

 

I suppose that in CA this would be considered child abuse...

 

Only if it were done by a conservative. Liberals are incapable of committing crimes as the Biden incident proves.

 

no I base my conclusion on An inconvenient Truth for you.

Interesting that you have to fabricate such nonsense.

 

No I'm not writing you a list of names. Such an act would be pointless.

 

So you don't know jack about her but you want to talk about her?

Great man, real great. You're a master debater. Truly.

https://heavy.com/news/2019/09/greta-thunbergs-family-parents/

Its LITERALLY part of the book her parents wrote ffs.


Try something for me: Educate yourself on the topic, THEN post about it.

 

It would be pointless for you as it would expose your hyperbole.

 

Nothing says "scientist" like refusing to release the data from your experiments for other people to reproduce, which was the entire point of the court case and...of course...science itself.

 

Look it up.

 

The UN has not seen a performance like that since the famous "babies taken out of incubators" performance of 1991, they were about equally credible.

 

Lol, a whole 500 smart people huh? And let me guess... they just signed one piece of paper, and the majority are in careers only tangentially related to climate science? And maybe it's not peer reviewed science in any way?

Hmm, given that I just gave you a list of 200 entire organizations that disagree, and many of the studies I posted looked at over 10,000 published papers..., and there are maybe millions of scientists... no, that wouldn't be very impressive.

 

Just want to make sure. Your position is that not handing over every document you have to anyone even a partisan hack means that a person instantly has no credibility.

 

What did I fabricate? That's what you said.

 

Okay.

 

I got you to provide a link didn't I?

Her selective mutism and not eating at 11 means absolutely nothing today. I've worked with kids on the spectrum who were one way at 10, 11 yrs old and very different and in a much better place at 15-18 yrs old. Maybe educate yourself on Asperger's.

 

Why don’t you see what the universities and every major corporations have to say.
Deniers already admit by their posts they don’t seem understand science. No sense explaining how it works in the face of ignorance. Either you accept what every university and govt in the world says, or you don’t. Your little “ causation” request is the typical red herring of ignorance.

 

A straw man.

 

You don’t know much about science do you ?

 

Oh? In what way?

 

Your argument doesn't even make sense.

The court case was over the conclusions Mann arrived at with his "science".

"Science" he didn't want to turn over to have anyone else attempt to replicate.

That's not science, and Mann is a junk scientist.

 

I believe it was a libel suit brought by Mann against ball. And, it seems all challenges to the actual science (which isn't decided in a court) were found to be without merit. He isn't a junk scientist, your politics just disagree with the science.

 

You comments are pretty naive and indicative How little you know about science. But keep pretending you know more then every university in the world. It’s comical.