Text messages link Ukraine investigation and Trump meeting

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Egoboy, Oct 4, 2019.

  1. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You keep saying that he left in tears, but have yet to remotely come close to explaining why.
     
  2. Brit

    Brit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2016
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    63
    It is perfectly possible that that reply was motivated by an attempt by Sondland to cover his tracks because the whistleblower's existence was going to be made public that day, or just because seeing the text from Taylor made him realise "Oh god, this stuff is in writing now." By the way, it's a little impolite to call the acting US ambassador to Kiev a nobody. And what's with all the claims of intellectual dishonesty? There are always different ways of looking at things, and anyone who is unable to consider a different viewpoint is unlikely to have a very balanced view.
     
    MrTLegal likes this.
  3. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wait...are you trying to argue that a white house visit is not something that Ukraine wanted?
     
  4. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trump requesting a foreign government investigate a domestic political opponent while he simultaneously and unilaterally held up hundreds of millions in military aid and promised to refrain from publicly discussing politically damaging matters and then trying to hide, lie about, and obstruct the investigation into the complaint is an abuse of power.

    Abuse of power is an impeachable offense. And he will be impeached.

    But thanks for wishing America good luck!
     
  5. Brit

    Brit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2016
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Whether or not the Biden thing is illegal, it stinks; I'm all for investigating it. As for the 2016 election, if Trump had pursued it because of US election security, I'd have been fine with it. But since he mentions Hillary's server and the Bidens, it makes it appear he wanted to gain political advantage from it, which is a very different thing.
     
    MrTLegal and The Mello Guy like this.
  6. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did Trump discuss Biden in the phone call with Ukraine?
     
  7. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Neither of those analogies are valid examples of a quid pro quo.
     
  8. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ...the top Ukrainian diplomat, the one appointed by Trump, is a confused nobody?
     
  9. Brit

    Brit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2016
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Well, I guess it's an unavoidable point that the impeachment process is more public than a law-enforment investigation. But I'd accept a degree of unfairness from a left-leaning media, yes.
     
    Dutch likes this.
  10. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The ones not actively trying to hide evidence of corruption from a potential investigation.
     
  11. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ...you think "look into" somehow does not mean "investigate?"
     
  12. Brit

    Brit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2016
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    63
    The point is Trump appears to be doing it for political gain - he references Hillary's server, the Mueller report and the Bidens. If he was mainly concerned about election integrity then why didn't he talk about that?
     
    MrTLegal likes this.
  13. Borat

    Borat Banned

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    23,909
    Likes Received:
    9,859
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Dutch likes this.
  14. Brit

    Brit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2016
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Borat likes this.
  15. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well and everyone
     
  16. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not Joe Biden specifically, but what he was bragging about. Corruption was a major issue with the prior admin in Ukraine
     
  17. Brit

    Brit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2016
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    63
    The 3 specific things Trump referenced in that bit of the call were Hillary's server, the Mueller report and the Bidens. Does it sound like he was concerned with general corruption in the Ukraine?
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2019
    MrTLegal and Egoboy like this.
  18. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes....specifcally the allegations of Ukraine interferring in the 2016 election
     
  19. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean the 2016 interference by democrats.
     
  20. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why would he be? Why aren’t you interested in democrats corruption here?
     
  21. Brit

    Brit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2016
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I was answering a point about general corruption in Ukraine; but rereading it I realise the poster hadn't said Trump was talking about general corruption.
     
  22. Brit

    Brit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2016
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Sorry, read your post too quick - I thought you meant Trump was advocating against general corruption in the prior admin
     
  23. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,260
    Likes Received:
    37,978
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is that the new line? Sure it was a QPQ, but it’s justified!!
     
  24. Brit

    Brit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2016
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    434
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Of course I'm interested in democrat corruption. Why do you assume everyone is partisan?
     
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2019
  25. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Absolutely... If I break into your house and hold a gun to your wife's head until you produce evidence you broke the law in the past.... and then you do, seems what I did is considered perfectly fine...

    That is a truly ****ed up way to view the world... Extortion, Coercion - pick your description..
     
    The Mello Guy likes this.

Share This Page