Strongsville priest posed as female minor to receive nudes from teenage boy, court records allege

Not sure if this post is missing a comma somewhere, or if you’ve typed exactly what you meant to say...

 

Can systemic action of the church be a blight on the church? When does it just become what they’re all about?

 

I’m sure you be been very careful not to. You certainly do your level best to conflate the two though. Sounds like you’d rather let implication do the talking for you.

 

Shame we can’t do away with organized religion on the whole. That’s clean it right up.

 

More and more people have changed to house churches and use no professional clergy.

 

As a Catholic I do care !!!

 

Thank you for admitting his claim was false even when he couldn't.

Then prove it Dave. Go ahead. If its so obvious you should have no trouble doing so.

This is where you guys always fail. Its all about the label not the evidence to support it.

 

Yes the comma was missing. Sorry if you were so confused with such a simple sentence.

 

I believe that’s a good trend. People would be wise to keep their faith between God and themselves. Organized religion is a scourge.

 

It was a bit of a jab at you. I wasn’t actually confused. I just found it funny that, sans comma, your post said the exact opposite of what you intended to say.

 

The only people who don’t see what you are doing already dislike gay people as much as you do — thankfully a dying minority.

 

What needs to be proved? You tend to, as seen in this thread, use the phrase “homosexual pedophile”. The orientation of homosexual is separate from the mental affliction of pedophilia.

 

What’s the lesson here? Gays are pervs?

 

How did you gather from a news report about a pedophile priest?

 

Or priests are pervs.
Or men are pervs.

All depends on the narrative you are trying to push.

 

lol Sure you weren't.

 

Thanks for selectively quoting my post.
I’ll repost the bit that made you look foolish since you neglected to.

I’m normally not inclined to nitpick posts, but when it changes the very meaning of a post to the opposite of what is intended, I take note. Thanks for the laugh.

 

No I read your excuse after the fact. It was as amusing as your inability to prove I ever said or implied all homosexuals were pedophiles.

 

What’s the point of giving the punchline of a joke along with the setup? That wouldn’t be terribly funny.
I didn’t imply you said all homosexuals are pedophiles. I said you conflate the two by regularly using the phrase “homosexual pedophile”. Homosexuality is an orientation, pedophilia is a mental affliction. The two are unrelated.

 

Liberalism is a religion.

 

Explain how.

 

It was homosexual lust, right? A male looking for another male? Or did I get that wrong?

 

How is it not?

I am not religious, but the parallels between evangelical Christian's and liberals is evident.

Liberals worship at the alter of collectivism, which requires forcing those views on everybody else to be sustainable... the same concept of christians who believe their god desired pushing their beliefs on non-believers.

 

preachers should not be above the law and anyone in the church that hides this behavior should be considered an accomplice to the crime

 

What does Homosexuality got to do with pedophilia?