Former Breitbart Editor: Stephen Miller is a white supremacist.

Their child born here is a citizen, with as much rights as you. Tough.

 

Yep. And illegals are thus a huge drain on our welfare system.

"A large share of the welfare used by immigrant households with children is received on behalf of their U.S.-born children, who are American citizens. But even households with children comprised entirely of immigrants (no U.S.-born children) still had a welfare use rate of 56 percent in 2009"

https://cis.org/Report/Welfare-Use-Immigrant-Households-Children

But when they regularly use our emergency rooms at taxpayer expense they are obviously abusing our system.

 

No, they are not, but far right red state welfare suckers are a vast drain, taking far more than any group of immigrants.

 

Much of that in red states is illegals. Texas has a significant number of illegals. But I just gave you statistics across the board. Illegal families use welfare at a much higher rate. None of this has anything to do with anyone being any kind of supremacist of course. People are desperate to find any reason to smear and this is just another example of a failed attempt.

 

Almost all of that red state vast sucking sound is from illiterate far righties. Illegal families can't use "a much higher rate," because illegals can't get the funds. However, citizens are entitled to those funds.

White supremacists hate illegals and will smear them with lies such as using welfare funds the fact which they can't access.

 

They cant help themselves. When facts are not on their side, they just simply lie.

 

I gave you the stats but you don't care. Illegal families get welfare through their children. Illegal families use welfare at a much higher rate. You've given zero evidence that it is "far righties" within red states that are using welfare unless you believe most illegals are far-righties which you haven't demonstrated either. It's like your "facts" are just stuff you make up.

 

You gave me your opinion that misrepresented the facts.

Children receiving welfare legally are families receiving welfare money legally.

White red neck southerners receive far more money in much greater numbers than immigrant families.

You need to check your numbers.

 

Almost all of that red state vast sucking sound is from illiterate far righties. Illegal families can't use "a much higher rate," because illegals can't get the funds. However, citizens are entitled to those funds.

White supremacists hate illegals and will smear them with lies such as using welfare funds the fact which they can't access.

 

You just made that up but that's okay. If you can't back things up with real facts then just make up your own.

 

Just another fact you'll ignore. Of course none of this has anything to do with Miller:

"Democrats are about twice as likely as Republicans to have received food stamps at some point in their lives"

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-ta...cs-and-demographics-of-food-stamp-recipients/

 

If all else fails go after whitey.

 

Glitch is trying to ignore that scores of millions of red necks and their children receive government aid compared to three million or so legal immigrant children.

 

You've offered no evidence to debunk, as I've stated over and over. Still here waiting for evidence. So far all you've been able to show is something something immigrant crime, which has nothing to do with white supremacy. Now follow the laser pointer....

 

Why so racist?

 

I do not care if citizens get help. Millions of illegals are not entitled.to it.

 

So you admit illegals are committing welfare fraud? Thanks for proving illegals commit crimes in droves.

 

Trying to understand your argument here. So anyone who points out the truism that illegal families receive benefits at a disproportionate level to the general population are by default white supremacists?

 

Yes, because it is a good point that leftists cannot refute!

 

The argument is quite clear: the immigrants are not a real problem.

They do not anywhere get near the entitlements in proportion to their numbers, whereas the redneck population cleans up.

 

It's not a "truism".

It's a report from a right-wing anti-immigration think tank employing seriously flawed methodology.

 

Well the report provides a detailed breakdown of the methodology. I have not seen anything that disproves the analysis or suggests otherwise.

 

Still not sure how this makes Miller anything. So if a person doesn't believe bringing in millions of impoverished persons without going through the legal channels, if they don't think that's a good thing then we should label them as supremacists?

 

Providing a methodology does not make that methodology sound.

 

Sounds more like you don't like the results of the study. I'm sure you would agree that the poverty rate of illegals is very high. I imagine you would also agree that illegal families with children here immediately qualify for government subsistence through that child.