WATCH LIVE | Impeachment trial of President Trump continues in Senate (Day 4)

More like 80,000 servers. Each region has 5-10 locations called data centers.

 

Because they were able to reach their own conclusion independent of looking at the cloud based servers.

 

Schiff's saying stuff like ""Do you truly believe that this President, if he believed investigating you was in his personal political interest, do you truly believe that this President would even hesitate before doing so?" to use an evidence of his guilt.

So if that constitutes evidence against a president how hard would it be to be done to you or I ?

 

By "It," do you mean "Impeachment?" Because if you meant "convict for a crime," then you are forgetting what is the point of the Impeachment Trial

 

That's okay. Hillary can fix them. That gave Biden time to talk to the other half, the children in the room.

 

Even if you believe that they should've sent someone for optics alone.

I think what you wrote seems like okaying half a**ed police work personally but I could be wrong

 

How can Schiff say "Trump will do it again" that's once again not a fact but an inference unless he's got a crystal ball

 

Ah the semantics game....... Nice

 

This is the craziest of Schiff's conspiracy theories about Trump: "You have to remove him from office now because he will do something bad in the future."

House Dems haven't even proved that Trump did anything wrong in the past.

Who gets tossed out for something they haven't done yet?

 

Exactly. That would be like my boss saying "I'm going to fire you today because you are gong to make a mistake in July."

...and Schiff isn't even Trump's boss.

 

Not to these guys.

 

Here's a question I have about the whole Trump is pushing Russian talking points... What if the talking points are true?

If a person you hate says "hey the sky is blue" if you agree with that statement does that mean you are pals??

 

Ukraine does not investigate US law or events here.

 

And he is bringing back up Russian collusion which was debunked by the Mueller report. Utter desperation.

 

Hardly.......

 

Already showed a distinction without merit.

 

To give your boss credit in your hypothetical scenario he wouldn't be in the highest chamber of the government.

 

Yes, to these guys. You exert executive privilege in response to the people who issued the subpoena.

 

Then why was trump asking them to? Why are you talking about some February announcement?

 

No, you have not.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6560656-JACKSON-MCGAHN-RULING.html

 

George Stephouplous and Dan Abrams were just talking about smirking and body language...... stay tuned they'll be reading auras and chakras next.

Wth are they doing????

 

House Dems have proven their case - the man was impeached explicitly because the House Dems proved their case. You ask the jury to deliver your desired ruling after you have proven your case.

Now they are asking the Senate to remove Trump based on their proof.

 

Sekulow is on CSPAN2 asking [media] if the Steele Dossier, paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC, was not "foreign interference" in the 2016 election.

Defense starts tomorrow morning, and only plans to spend a couple hours on Saturday, called "Death Valley for television ratings". Can't wait to hear the defense. Expect to hear the Biden name. A lot.

 

Maybe so but why are they even talking about the future they can't know with certainty

 

As the House Democrats and Trump's own Intelligence Agency Appointees have made abundantly clear - the Russian talking points are NOT true. Now, if you have reason to believe that they are true - despite your own Intelligence Agency Conclusions - then bring those to the relevant individuals and get them to re-analyze the facts.

But to raise conspiracy theory that they COULD be true simply enforces the distrust of US intelligence agencies and further encourages Russian interference.